Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Contract Law - Breaching Terms of a Contract Summary $12.87
Ajouter au panier

Resume

Contract Law - Breaching Terms of a Contract Summary

 0 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Établissement

Comprehensive summary/exam notes on the rules surrounding breaching terms of a contract in Contract Law. This document covers anticipatory breach, the possibility of termination following breach of a condition, warranty or innominate term, damages following breach (expectation interest, reliance in...

[Montrer plus]

Aperçu 2 sur 11  pages

  • 6 octobre 2024
  • 11
  • 2022/2023
  • Resume
  • Inconnu
avatar-seller
Breaching Terms of a Contract:
Includes:
- Anticipatory Breach
- Termination:
o Condition
o Warranty
o Innominate term
- Damages
o Expectation Interest
o Reliance Interest
o Restitution Interest
 Account for Profits
 Negotiating Damages
o Restrictions
 Mitigation
 Remoteness
 Causation
o Damages for Pain and Suffering
- Penalty Clauses

Assume that requirements of a legally enforceable contract are present.

Anticipatory Breach:
- Anticipatory breach = where one contracting party informs the other party, before the time
fixed for performance under the contract, that he will not perform his obligations under the
contract.
- Effect:
o Entitles the ‘innocent party’ to terminate performance immediately and claim
damages at the date of the acceptance of breach – the party does not have to wait until
the date fixed for performance.
 Hochster v de la Tour
o BUT – have a choice.
 Innocent party can choose to affirm the contract and demand performance.
 This does not prevent the innocent party accepting the breach if, at the date
fixed for performance, the other party still refuses to perform.
 The innocent party, in addition to affirming the contract, may continue with
the performance of his obligations under the contract, even though he knows
that the performance is not wanted by the other party – action for the agreed
sum.
 White and Carter (Councils) Ltd v McGregor – tells us that this does
not prevent a claim and the claimant is entitled to recover the full
contract price.
o Case concerned bin advertisements which the claimant
prepared and exhibited even after the defendant made clear
that he wished to cancel the contract.
o HL held that the appellants had the right to carry out the
contract and could therefore claim for the entire value.
 BUT – this rule is not unqualified – the defendant had to show that
the claimant did not have any legitimate interest in fulfilling the
contract.
o Lord Reid and Lord Hodson – emphasised that it would be
impossible to say that the appellants should be deprived of

, their right to claim the contract price merely because the
benefit to them, as against claiming damages and re-letting
their advertising space, might be small in comparison with
the loss to the respondent.
o It appears from this judgement that the facts need to be fairly
extreme before it is held that there is no legitimate interest –
there is no obligation to behave reasonably.
 E.g., the chance of an “elite” academic publisher publishing your
work would plausibly be a huge benefit to your career.
- Implied term of good faith??

Breach of a particular clause of a contract – ‘Termination’:
- To determine what remedies the claimant can obtain against the defendant, it must be
established the ‘type’ of term that has been breached.
o Whether they are considered conditions, warranties or innominate terms.
- “Condition” = an essential term of the contract which goes to the root or the heart of the
contract.
o E.g., when purchasing a new car, the terms as to the make of the car, its
roadworthiness, and the obligation to pay the price = all conditions.
- “Warranty” = a lesser, subsidiary term of the contract.
o E.g., the colour of the car (unless it was part of the description).
- “Innominate Term” = neither a condition nor a warranty.
o The innominate term approach looks to the effect of the breach and questions whether
the innocent party to the breach was deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the
contract.
 Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd
- There are three recognised ways in which a term may be held to be a condition:
o Statutory classification
o Judicial classification
o Classification of the parties
- Statutory Classification:
o E.g., ss.12-15 Sale of Goods Act 1979 – implies certain terms into contracts for the
sale of goods.
 The implied terms as to satisfactory quality, fitness for purpose and
compliance with description and sample = conditions.
 The implied term that the goods are free from charges and incumbrances in
favour of third parties = warranty.
- Judicial Classification:
o There are two grounds on which courts may decide that a term is a condition:
1. Where performance of the term goes to the root of the contract so that, by
necessary implication, the parties must have intended that the term be treated as a
condition, breach of which would entitle the other party to treat himself as
discharged.
Couchman v Hill.
BUT – although it must go to the root of the contract, it need not be the case
that every breach of the term should deprive the innocent party of
substantially the whole benefit which it was intended that he would obtain –
Bunge Corp v Tradax Export SA.
2. Where binding authority requires the court to hold that the term is a condition.
In some industries, parties trade on standard terms, and a decision that a
particular standard term is a condition will not only affect that contract, but
also all subsequent contracts of that type.
Governing factor = certainty.
BUT – certainty carries with it a price.

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur bethjscott5713. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour $12.87. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

65040 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 15 ans

Commencez à vendre!

Récemment vu par vous


$12.87
  • (0)
Ajouter au panier
Ajouté