100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
NR503 Population Health, Epidemiology & Statistical Principles Exam | Questions and Verified Answers Rated A+ | Chamberlain $10.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

NR503 Population Health, Epidemiology & Statistical Principles Exam | Questions and Verified Answers Rated A+ | Chamberlain

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • NR 503
  • Institution
  • NR 503

NR503 Population Health, Epidemiology & Statistical Principles Exam | Questions and Verified Answers Rated A+ | Chamberlain NR503 Population Health, Epidemiology & Statistical Principles Exam | Questions and Verified Answers Rated A+ | Chamberlain

Preview 4 out of 37  pages

  • October 7, 2024
  • 37
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • NR 503
  • NR 503
avatar-seller
nursehailey
NR503 Population Health, Epidemiology
& Statistical Principles Exam | Questions
and Verified Answers Rated A+ |
Chamberlain
In the primary analysis of the study, the investigators measured
exposure as a dichotomous variable (any history of STD
compared to no history of STD). In subsequent analyses, the
investigators looked at the relationship between specific STDs
and infertility. They noted the following measures of association:
for past history of gonorrhea, the odds ratio was 2.4 with a 95%
confidence interval of 1.3 to 4.4. For past history of chlamydia, the
odds ratio was 1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.2 to 2.1.
These results indicate that:

- Correct Answer - The odds ratio for chlamydia is more precise
than the odds ratio for gonorrhea



If an investigator is analyzing the results of a clinical trial, then
applying the "intention to treat" rule means that which type of bias
is most likely to result?

- Correct Answer - Misclassification bias

,Investigators wanted to know if some military personnel are more
error prone than others and would be a poor risk for training as a
pilot. A study was done in which individuals who had injuries
during basic training were compared to individuals who had not
had ........ had not had a childhood injury to determine which
group had a higher rate of injuries during basic training. At the end
of follow-up, there was no difference in the rate of injuries
experienced by each group. What type of design was used for the
first study?

- Correct Answer - Case-control



One commanding officer disagreed with this conclusion. He asked
the investigators to design a second study in which all individuals
were asked about childhood injuries prior to the start of basic
training. The group who reported having a childhood injury was
compared to the group who had not had a childhood injury to
determine which group had a higher rate of injuries during basic
training. At the end of follow-up, there was no difference in the
rate of injuries experienced by each group. What type of study
design was used for the second study?

- Correct Answer - Prospective cohort

,Which study better tests the hypothesis that there is a relationship
between childhood injury and subsequent injury during basic
training?

- Correct Answer - Prospective cohort study



Which of the following may explain why the two studies observed
different results concerning the association between childhood
injury and training injury?

- Correct Answer - Potential recall bias in the case-control study



In a study of oral contraceptive (OC) use and hypertension, male
interviewers for the study found a lower prevalence of OC use
among participants than did female interviewers using the same
Questionnaire. Which term best describes this finding?

- Correct Answer - Nondifferential misclassification



A matched case-control study of sunscreen use during childhood
and melanoma results in an odds ratio of 1.0. Cases of melanoma
were matched by sex and race to controls who were identified by

, random digit dialing. What is the most likely explanation for the
study's null finding?

- Correct Answer - Information bias concerning past sunscreen
use



Among patients with liver cancer, current alcohol drinkers have a
worse prognosis for survival than nondrinkers. What would be the
impact on the odds ratio for a case-control study of current
alcohol use and liver cancer mortality if prevalent cases were
included with incident cases of the cancer?

- Correct Answer - Decrease the odds ratio when prevalent cases
are included



In a case-control study of maternal cigarette smoking as a risk
factor for low birth weight, the investigators concluded that
mothers of children with low birth weight were more likely to report
smoking during pregnancy relative to mothers of children with
normal birth weight. The reporting error most likely caused the
odds ratio to:

- Correct Answer - Increase above the true value

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nursehailey. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78462 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart