100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Lectures History of Philosophy II $4.28   Add to cart

Class notes

Lectures History of Philosophy II

 104 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

All lectures, History of Philosophy II, Minor Philosophy, University of Groningen

Preview 3 out of 18  pages

  • January 18, 2020
  • 18
  • 2018/2019
  • Class notes
  • Unknown
  • All classes
avatar-seller
History of Philosophy II – 19th and 20th century
Week I – Enlightenment – Light (and shadow) of Reason
General introduction + Kant

Topic of this course:
19th and 20th century philosophy: “Continental Philosophy”

Approach in this course:
‫ ﮲‬History of philosophy
‫ ﮲‬Close reading
‫ ﮲‬General Survey
‫ ﮲‬Hermeneutics

Hermeneutics: exchange of minds, dialogue. The text has a story and the interpretation another
one. Sometimes abused: politics.

9 courses, 9 authors and 14 texts to study for the exam.

Every week: submit your three questions which will determine 20% of the final grade of this
course. SUNDAYS AT 18:00
One comprehension question, one critical question and one short statement. Not
necessary, but a suggestion.

Enlightenment: intro to Immanuel Kant
Literature: Answering the Question: What is Enlightenment (1784)
Critique of Pure Reason (Preface to the Second Edition) (1787)

Kant is one of the most important philosophers of ‘modern’ times. He has written texts on all kinds
of topics: political, anthropological, etc.

Continental Philosophy
Continental vs. analytical.

Continental Philosophy
‫ ﮲‬No methodological unity
‫ ﮲‬No national or linguistic unity
‫ ﮲‬No topical unity

Analytical Philosophy
‫ ﮲‬SEE POWERPOINT

Analytic Philosophy The other of analytical philosophy
Argument rhetoric

Historical Approach
‫ ﮲‬History is always connected implicitly as well as explicitly with the present
‫ ﮲‬Authors, texts and problems are selected due to their importance for current issues inside
and outside philosophy
‫ ﮲‬We cannot avoid dealing with the canon, either in accepting it or rejecting it
‫ ﮲‬Context / hermeneutics

,Immanuel Kant (1)
Kant reacted to the theories of Hume.
Combine necessity of science, react to Hume: laws of nature, they are necessary. The laws always
function. Necessity & the moral law within. Freedom is the most important topic of enlightenment.
For Kant we are citizens of two worlds: world of nature and the world of human beings. God exists
according to Kant. No basis of religion needed to prove that we are free, God exists, but he is not
necessary for freedom.

Freedom
Ignorance and fanaticism were common in this times (end of 18th century).

‫﮲‬ French Revolution in 1789.
‫﮲‬ Enlightened Absolutism.
o Frederic the Great (1712-1786). Make the basic educational system available for
everyone. Idea of enlightenment to get to freedom.
‫﮲‬ Lisbon earthquake in 1755.
o Philosophers reacted to this natural catastrophe, because it made people think
about the progress in science, which made us strong, but we still can’t do anything
about nature.

Immanuel Kant (2)
His parents were pietists, which is Protestantism where the duty and feelings are more important
than the actual Bible/Christian belief. Kant was more interested in science than in philosophy. He
wanted to understand people like Newton.

There are three questions in which all interest of reason(speculative and practical) is united
1. What can I know?
2. What should I do?
3. What may I hope?

4. What is human being?
Not really question 4, because it is a combination of the three questions above: what can I know
as a human being? What should I do as a human being? What may I hope as a human being?

What can I know What should I do?
Fundamental laws of nature Fundamental principle of morality
Necessity Freedom to choose in accordance with the Moral Laws
Universality

Conflict between:
Necessity of nature vs. freedom of human being

We are free not to accept the universal laws of morality.

Critique of Pure Reason
Transcendental idealism

Fundamental laws of nature
Fundamental principle of morality

Prove the validity and the limits of an a priori knowledge.
In order to do things like art, you need limits. Drawing is limited by the size of the paper. Or you
have to finish something before a certain deadline.

, The idea of limits is connected with creating something. We are not immortal so we always have
at least one limit, namely the limit of time before we die.

What is freedom without limits? = an important question.
Definition: comes from ‘finish’. So definition of ‘table’ is explained by the limits of the table.

In Kant’s theory the limits are literal: what can I know?

How do we know something is true?
Critique of
‫ ﮲‬Skepticism
‫ ﮲‬Dogmatism
‫ ﮲‬Indifferentism

Skepticism
Hume on causality
‫ ﮲‬Constant and regular conjunction
‫ ﮲‬Correlation is not the same as causation
‫ ﮲‬No a priori connection, i.e. no necessary connection between cause and effect

Dogmatic or axiomatic starting point
Reason: Rationalism Perception: Empiricism
Descartes: Innate ideas Locke: Tabula Rasa
The mind is like an empty page
All knowledge comes from experience
Sense perception causes ideas

How can we justify the universal validity of (Newton’s) physics?

Copernical turn: change of perspective
For dogmatics it’s an arrow, not a turn.

Transcendental Idealism
Transcendental = that which can be known as a condition of the possibility of experience
=/= transcendent (surpassing the limits of experience)

Idealism = doubt that there are any objects other than minds and their representations
A kind of realism (it assumes that objects do exist independently of our perceptions)

Reading Questions on Kant
1. What is the distinction between public and private reason?
2. What is the difference between a “positive” and a “negative” use of the Critique of Pure
Reason?
3. Please compare these two different texts. Are there

Week II – German Idealism and the “Cunning of Reason”
Discussion Kant, intro Hegel

Immanuel Kant – Discussion
Copernican Revolution:
Our cognition must conform to objects → objects
must conform to our cognition

Empirical knowledge of Phenomena

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller marijev. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.28. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.28  3x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart