100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
JRN 430 Exam 1 book terms answers $7.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

JRN 430 Exam 1 book terms answers

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • JRN 430
  • Institution
  • JRN 430

JRN 430 Exam 1 book terms answers rule of lawthe framework of a society in which pre established norms and procedures provide for consistent, neutral decision making precedentcase judgment that establishes binding authority and guiding principles for cases to follow on closely analogous...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 11  pages

  • October 17, 2024
  • 11
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • JRN 430
  • JRN 430
avatar-seller
WorkAce
JRN 430 Final answers
Sheppard was jailed for murdering his wife, but the ruling was overturned after an 8-
to-1 decision from the Supreme Court found that Sheppard did not receive a fair trial.
Received too much media coverage and jury was able to leave courthouse and read
all of that so they were bias. Ruled that trial judge should have either postponed the
proceedings or transferred them to a different venue.✔✔Sheppard v. Maxwell

- Miller: mass mailing of obscene material.

-Court HELD that obscene materials don't have 1st amendment rights.

-Modified obscenity test: Miller test (3-prong)

Standard still in place today. In its aftermath, sexual-themed materials are more
available.✔✔Miller v. California (1973)

Virginia Citizens Consumer Council challenged Virginia statute that declared it
unprofessional conduct for licensed pharmacists to advertise prescription drug
prices.

Supreme Court ruled first amendment applied & prices could be
advertised.✔✔Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer
Council (1976)

-Part of the criteria for determining obscenity in Miller v. California (1973)
-Work is considered obscene if it lacks "literary, artistic, political or "scientific"
value."✔✔LAPS test

Roth convicted of mailing obscene materials;

Supreme Court ruled (also applied to Alberts v. California) that obscenity was not
protected under 1st Amendment.

Created obscenity test: "Whether avg. person, applying contemporary standards,
would view material as a whole to apply to prurient interest."

Miller V. California (1973) modified obscenity test.✔✔Roth v. US (1957)

1. The dominant theme of the material taken as a whole must appeal to prurient
interest in sex.
2. A court must find that the material is patently offensive because it affronts
contemporary community standards relating to the description or representation of
sexual matters.
3. Before something can be found to be obscene, it must be utterly without
redeeming social value.

Modified by 1973 Miller V. California case.✔✔Roth-Memoirs Test (1966)

, Barred the mailing of obscene publications.✔✔Comstock Act of 1873

"I can't define it, but I know it when I see it."✔✔Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart
said what about obscenity..?

Four-part test used by courts to determine restrictions on commercial speech:
1. Whether adv. is misleading & whether it concerns a legal product or service.
2. Whether asserted govt. interest is substantial
3. Whether regulation directly advances asserted govt. interest
4. Whether regulation is 'not more extensive' than necessary to serve govt.
interest✔✔Central Hudson Test

1. Prurient Interest Test
2. Patent Offensiveness Test
3. Serious Value Test (LAPS Test)✔✔Miller 3 part test

Fanny Hill case which, in conjunction with Roth, provided the Roth-Memoirs Test for
obscenity.

Book "Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" deemed obscene --> not
protected by first amendment.✔✔Memoirs v. Massachusetts (1966)

Brand of philosophy that deals w/ moral component of human life✔✔Ethics

4 considerations to make ethics decisions.
1. Facts
2. Values
3. Principles
4. Loyalties✔✔Potter Box Model

1. Compromise Principle
2. Categorical Imperative
3. Principle of Utility
4. Agape Principle
5. Rawl's Veil of Ignorance✔✔Ethical Principles (5)

1. META Ethics (broad)
2. Normative Ethics (theoretical rules)
3. Applied Ethics (problem-solving branch) (ethics codes)✔✔3 Main Branches of
Ethics

1. Seek truth & report it
2. Minimize harm
3. Act independently
4. Be accountable/transparent✔✔SPJ's 4 Ethical Principles

1. Truth & Accuracy
2. Independence
3. Impartiality

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller WorkAce. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart