100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Water & Planning - lectures and papers [2020] $9.11   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Water & Planning - lectures and papers [2020]

1 review
 83 views  5 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

This summary is all the information you will need to pass the Water and Planning (GEWAPL) course exam. It contains the information given in the lectures, and comprehensive summaries for all the papers that were obligatory to read. It has been subdivided per lecture, and contains a total of 48 pages...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 48  pages

  • January 26, 2020
  • 48
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: lucymulgrew701 • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
Lecture 1
12-11-2019 | Introduction | Van Ruiten & Hartmann (2016), Wiering & Immink (2006)



We (the world) have a problem with water quality and water quantity, such as:
- Sinking cities and countries;
- Increasing number of flood events;
- Continuous urbanization;
- Pressing water issues (too much (flood), too little (drought), or not clean).

→ Cannot be solved by technical measures alone, but there is just a lack of space for water.
→ ​Spatial problem​, which requires an integration between spatial planning and water management.


Phases of technocratization of Dutch water management
I Natural water state - The netherlands is mainly above sea levels.
(until 1000) - Nature rules over culture.
- Private flood protection (wierden/terpen).

II Defensive water - Exploitation of territory through agriculture, which led to protection
state (1000-1500) by sea/river dikes, water ways, ditches, sluices, etc.
- First official water board (first from of democratic governance!)

III Offensive water - ‘Golden Age’: money to invest in water management.
state (1500-1800) - First engineers → proactive approach (such as windmill
power/technology) → creation of new polders
- Birth of Rijkswaterstaat (1798): an ambition to create a centrally
governed state, together with water protection being seen as
governmental responsibility, and the need for central coordination
to improve the river network.
- Rijkswaterstaat is nowadays charged with the
operation/maintenance of the main water system (water boards on
lower level).

IV Manipulative - Malleability of society​: complete control over nature, due to
water state specialization and scientification as key concepts to solve social
(1800-present) issues.
- Large scale projects, e.g. closure of the Zuiderzee, Flevoland, first
round of Delta Works (south of Rotterdam after 1953), second round
of Delta Works (taking place now, “do not wait for another disaster.”)
- Technocratic paradise​: Rijkswaterstaat was a holy institute, and had a
lot of authority (‘State within the State’) as long as they protected the
Netherlands from flooding. They had a strong belief in their own
technical abilities/ability to shape Dutch society through intelligent
and perfect engineering.




GEWAPL - Summary lectures 1

,Waves of change
- Ecological awareness: ​from the 1970s onwards with the publication of “The Limits to Growth”
by the Club of Rome. Large water management project were more and more seen as
environmental catastrophes instead of engineering marvel.
- Democratization of society: d
​ ue to citizens wanting more voice in decision-making processes,
Rijkswaterstaat’s authoritarian attitude and lack of responsiveness came under growing
criticism.
- Near river floods (1994-1995)​: increasing awareness about the potential impacts of climate
change, which causes us to give room to the river instead of fighting it.
- Continuous development: l​ and subsidence/urbanization.


The spatial turn
An increasing awareness of the limits of coping with flood risks by technical measures alone, causes us
to create more space for the water.
→ ​Transition in water management → development of spatial flood protection measures/integrated
approach.
- Turning point is the year 2000 after an advice by the Deltacommissie (Commissie Veerman),
and the introduction policy of Room for the River in 2006.
- Caused by (near) floodings, international treaties, European guidelines, discussion about the
effects of climate change.

The spatial turn
Van Ruiten & Hartmann (2016)
1. Space for rivers → The dike is no longer the division between the responsibilities of the water
manager and spatial planner.
→ Adjustments in the physical landscape, and better coordination within the
institutional system, leading to new roles and responsibilities of actors.
- Include natural water retention measures (NWRM) such as
interception (retaining water in and on plants), increased plant
transpiration, improved soil infiltration, ponds and wetlands, and
reconnecting the floodplain.

2. Integrated → ​Horizontal integration​: account for interdependency and
approach interconnectedness between watershed functions.
- Across the dike​: cooperation between water planners and spatial
planners.
- Along the river:​ up and downstream development influence each
other, and teaming up is therefore important, such as ‘fit-for-
purpose’ governance between different institutions.
→ ​Vertical integration: c​ oordinated decision-making among different
geographical, hydrological, and jurisdictional scales.
→ ​Boundary planning (​ → lecture 14).




GEWAPL - Summary lectures 2

, 3. Beyond structural → Development of measures addressing the whole ‘safety chain’:
measures - Proaction:​ spatial flood management, such as inundation zones,
retention basins.
- Prevention​: ‘grey’ infrastructure, such as (mobile) flood barriers.
- Preparation​: precautionary measures/’resilient’ city, such as
adaptive building, individual risk protection/information, laws,
regulations, economic instruments, voluntary agreements.
- (After)Care:​ disaster management, such as effective/efficient actions,
briefings, trainings of disaster forces.
→ Transition from policies based on flood probability to risk based policies
(flood risk: the probability of a flood x the potential impact of flooding).

→ ​Technical & physical challenge, and institutional & governance challenge.


Policy arrangements for integration water management - spatial planning
Wiering & Immink (2006)

Policy arrangement
The consequence of a temporary
stabilisation of the ​content ​and
organisation ​of a specific policy
domain at a certain level of policy
implementation.
- Discourse: t​ he content
and the way give meaning
to/derive meaning from
that content.
- Power and resources: t​ ools with which an actors/coalition can exercise influence, such as
finances, knowledge, mobilisation by social movements.
- Rules of the game: ​institutional patterns and visions (e.g. Dutch polder model).

Safety/control paradox
A paradox that describes that
reinforcing dikes do not take away the
cause of the problem and partially
create new risks.




GEWAPL - Summary lectures 3

, Lecture 2
12-11-2019 | Water cycle and climate change | Robinson & Ward (2017) chapter 1/2



Water cycle
Almost every water cycle (average model
over a long period) is shown without:
- Dynamics on short term, e.g.
atmospheric processes and
human intervention.​
- Spatial variation, e.g. wetlands,
deserts.
- Temporal variation, e.g. more
drought/evaporation in summer.
→ Does not capture influences of short
time periods.
→ Know what and how the water cycle
changes when human/natural events
happen.

Precipitation (P) + runoff as inflow (Rin​ ​) + groundwater inflow (Gin​ ​) =
Runoff as outflow (R​out)​ + groundwater outflow (G​out​) + evaporation (E) + transpiration (T) + change in
storage (DS)


Evapotranspiration (ET)
Evaporation (water released by soil, canopies, waterbodies) + transpiration (water released from
plants into the air).
- Combined because hard to measure what comes from what source.
- Influenced by soil moisture stress, soil water salinity, management induced stress, etc.

Potential crop evapotranspiration (ET​c​)
ET that could occur if a crop had an ideal unlimited water supply

ET​c​= Kc​ ​ x ETo​
- K​c :​ crop coefficient, relies on crop height/aerodynamics, albedo of crop-soil surface, canopy
resistance, and evaporation from (exposed soil).
- ET​o​: reference evapotranspiration.




GEWAPL - Summary lectures 4

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller geography327. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.11. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

70055 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.11  5x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart