100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Eerder door jou gezocht
Eerder door jou gezocht
logo
Unit 22 - Aspects of Civil Liability for Business - Task 2 (P4 and M2) $4.00
In winkelwagen
Snel navigeren naar
Voorbeeld
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. Business 2010 QCF
  6.  
  7. Unit 22 - Aspects of Civil Liability for Business

Essay

Unit 22 - Aspects of Civil Liability for Business - Task 2 (P4 and M2)

8 beoordelingen
 9 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Unit 22 - Aspects of Civil Liability for Business
  • Instelling
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)

This is the second task of Unit 22 - Aspects of Civil Liability for Business, in which consists of P4 and M2. To achieve P4, you need to define the tort of ‘Nuisance’ and explain the requirements of liability in the law of Nuisance, applying it to real life case examples. For M2, you need to ap...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 1 van de 3  pagina's

Document informatie

  • 27 januari 2020
  • 3
  • 2017/2018
  • Essay
  • Onbekend
  • Onbekend

Onderwerpen

  • btec
  • business
  • level 3
  • extended diploma
  • unit 22
  • task 2
  • aspects of civil liability for business
  • p4
  • m2

Geschreven voor

  • BTEC
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)
  • Business 2010 QCF
  • Unit 22 - Aspects of Civil Liability for Business
Alle documenten voor dit vak (5)

8  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: zainabwarsame20 • 2 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: ahmadd • 3 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: cactuscactus20202020 • 3 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: lauren2120 • 4 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: 57803 • 4 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: chris5star • 4 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: mamara_rodrigues13 • 4 jaar geleden

Bekijk meer beoordelingen  

Verkoper

avatar-seller
JVellaG

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

P4 – Define the tort of ‘Nuisance’ and explain the requirements of liability in the law of
Nuisance.
In this task, I am going to explain the requirements of liability in the law of Nuisance. Nuisance is a
way of disruption or annoyance to someone or a group of people. There are two different types of
Nuisance; Public Nuisance and Private Nuisance. Public Nuisance is a type of Nuisance in which it
disrupts or disturbs a group of people or someone in a public area such as a town or shopping
centre. Private Nuisance on the other hand is the disruption or disturbance to a group of people or
someone in an area like someone’s property or a neighbourhood.

Continuous Interference is the disturbance or disruption that has happened continuously. An
example of this is in the Dr Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer Bros Ltd (1914) case, where there was
excavation work carried on from 7:30pm to 6:40am in which it disturbed guests and prevented them
from sleeping. This caused the claim to be successful after filing a complaint as Private Nuisance
doesn’t require to be permanent but requires to be continuous.

Unlawful Interference or Unreasonableness is where the claimant needs to provide proof that the
defendant’s actions or conduct was unreasonable. One form of evidence is locality in which if you
live in an area with a police station and ambulances nearby, then you would find it harder to sleep
than living in an isolated village. One example of Unlawful Interference is the Sturges v Bridgman
(1879) case, where a doctor was disturbed by a neighbour who was a confectioner that was
producing a lot of noise which was the evidence that the doctor was living in a noisy area.

Interference with the use or enjoyment of land is where the claimant needs to provide evidence of
the damage that has been made to either their land or property caused by nuisance which would
prevent someone from enjoying the use of their land. An example of this is the In Bliss v Hall (1838),
where there were smells and fumes from candle making which caused damage to adjoining land.

In terms of Defences, Prescription is where the defendant will not be liable if they plead a
prescriptive right to the nuisance if it has continued for 20 years with no interruption. An example of
this is the Sturges vs Bridgman (1879) case, where the confectioner had been operating for over 20
years in which the court held that the prescriptive right began on the use of the room.

In terms of Statutory Authority, this is a defence to private nuisance in which the activities taken
place that were complained about from the claimant were authorised. An example of this is the
Allen v Gulf Oil (1981) case, where the claimant complained about a nuisance of the smell, noise and
vibration from an oil refinery constructed by the defendant on their land in which it was authorised
by an Act of Parliament, therefore it wasn’t liable as it had a defence of Statutory Authority.

In terms of Remedies, Injunction is an authoritative warning or order that will only be granted at the
discretion of the court. An example of Injunction is the Miller v Jackson (1977) case, where a cricket
club was liable for nuisance as they were creating a nuisance by hitting the cricket balls out of the
ground, therefore the injunction failed.

Abatement is the ending or reduction of something. An example of this is the Michael A Jones case,
in which he fired a gun at his wife and child, which caused him to be put in jail for life which is a form
of Abatement.

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper JVellaG. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor $4.00. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 71250 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis

Laatst bekeken door jou

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

CLEP Psychology Practice Test 1 with correct answers 2024

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

BLEA 827 Traffic Final Exam Questions and Answers Rated A+

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

California Bail Exam Study Questions with correct answers

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(1)

Pharmacy Law - New York MPJE questions with correct answers

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

Mental Health 2023/24 B NGN (Questions with correct answers)

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

Food Manager Exam (All 100% Correct Answers) Latest 2024/2025

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

mktg again 3340 questions well answered graded A+ 2023/2024

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(2)

OCR AS LEVEL JUNE 2022 CHEMISTRY A PAPER 1 QUESTION PAPER

Tentamen (uitwerkingen) ·

(0)

NURS 6630 MIDTERM EXAM 1 – QUESTION AND ANSWERS(LATEST UPDATE)

$4.00  9x  verkocht
  • (8)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd