Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

SPEA-V184 Exam 2 || Well Elaborated Answers 2024/25

0 keer verkocht

Vak
SPEA-V184

Instelling
SPEA-V184

|clear and present danger test - Correct Answer -law should not punish speech unless there was a clear and present danger of producing harmful actions -"the question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present d...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 1 van de 4 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 23 oktober 2024
Aantal pagina's 4
Geschreven in 2024/2025
Type Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat Vragen en antwoorden

clear and present danger test law should not puni
imminent lawless action test brandenburg rule u
new york times v sullivan actual malice test
obrien test when a regulation prohibits conduct

Instelling SPEA-V184
Vak SPEA-V184

Volgen

Victoria108 Lid sinds 1 jaar 17 documenten verkocht

$9.49

Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel v.a. $43.25

In winkelwagen

Opslaan

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel (1)

Package deal for Spea-v 184 Exams With Complete Solutions

$ 106.90 $ 43.25 10 items

1. Tentamen (uitwerkingen) - Spea v 184 exam 1 detailed questions and expert verified solutions
2. Tentamen (uitwerkingen) - Spea-v 184 exam 1 lectures questions with high ratings 2024/25
3. Tentamen (uitwerkingen) - Spea-v 184: exam 2 detailed questions and expert verified solutions
4. Tentamen (uitwerkingen) - Spea v184 exam 2 questions and complete solutions
5. Tentamen (uitwerkingen) - spea-v 184 exam 3 answered correctly
6. Tentamen (uitwerkingen) - Spea-v184 final exam – well enlightened || new & revised
7. Tentamen (uitwerkingen) - Spea v-184 law and public affairs exam #1 100% solved & graded
8. Tentamen (uitwerkingen) - Spea-v 184: exam 1 law & public affairs questions and correct verified answers
9. Tentamen (uitwerkingen) - Spea v 184 exam 2 questions with quality solutions
10. Tentamen (uitwerkingen) - Spea-v184 exam 2 || well elaborated answers 2024/25
Meer zien

SPEA-V184 Exam 2 || Well Elaborated Answers
2024/25
|\clear and present danger test - Correct Answer -law should not punish speech unless
there was a clear and present danger of producing harmful actions
-"the question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances
and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring
about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of
proximity and degree."

imminent lawless action test (Brandenburg) - Correct Answer -rule used by the courts
that restricts speech only if it is aimed at producing or is likely to produce imminent
lawless action
-"The constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to
forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such
advocacy is
1. directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action
2. is likely to incite or produce such action"

New York Times v. Sullivan (Actual malice test) - Correct Answer -"prohibits a public
official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official
conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with actual malice - that is, with
the knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not."

O'Brien Test - Correct Answer "when a regulation prohibits conduct that combines
"speech" and "non-speech" elements, "a sufficiently important governmental interest in
regulating the non-speech element can justify incidental limitations on First Amendment
freedoms"
the regulation must:
1. be within the constitutional power of the government to enact
2. further an important or substantial government interest
3. that interest must be unrelated to the suppression of speech
4. prohibit no more speech than is essential to further that interest

strict scrutiny test - Correct Answer -a test applied by the court when a classification is
based on race; the government must show that there is a compelling reason for the law
and no other less restrictive way to meet the interest
- form judicial review courts use to determine the constitutionality of certain laws

Mathews v. Eldridge Balancing test - Correct Answer -Individual Interest: The interests
of the individual in retaining their property and the injury threatened by the official action
-Risk of erroneous deprivation: the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest
through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute
procedural safeguards

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Focus op de essentie

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.