Neurorecht en forensische psychiatrie (RGMUSTR134)
Institution
Universiteit Utrecht (UU)
Aantekeningen HC, samenvatting van de belangrijkste artikelen, aantekeningen werkgroep & oefententamen met antwoorden. Wordt soms terugverwezen naar slides dus handig om die bij de hand te hebben.
HC 5: Neuro-interventies in het strafrecht- in het licht van het EVRM ............................................. 17
Neurointerventie ............................................................................................................................. 17
Europees verdrag van de rechten van de mens ................................................................................. 18
Art. 3 EVRM ................................................................................................................................. 18
Art. 8 EVRM ................................................................................................................................. 19
Art. 9 EVRM ................................................................................................................................. 20
Art. 10 EVRM ............................................................................................................................... 21
Art. 5 EVRM ................................................................................................................................. 21
Debat ............................................................................................................................................. 21
HC 6: Ontoerekeningbaarheid...................................................................................................... 22
Bijzondere aard van de ontoereknbaarheid....................................................................................... 22
Ontoerekenbaarheid vóór Thijs H. .................................................................................................... 22
Korte bespreking Thijs H.- zaak ........................................................................................................ 23
Drie gedragskundige rapportages ................................................................................................. 23
Het Hof en HR over de stoornis .................................................................................................... 23
Criterium ontoerekenbaarheid volgens Hof en HR ........................................................................ 23
Discussiepunten over het stoornisvereisten ..................................................................................... 24
Psychiatrisch stoornisvereiste ..................................................................................................... 24
Positief juridisch stoornisvereiste ................................................................................................ 24
Schrappen stoornisvereiste ......................................................................................................... 24
Discussiepunten over het cognitieve criterium ................................................................................. 25
Voorbeelden ............................................................................................................................... 25
Analyse....................................................................................................................................... 26
1
,Neurorecht en forensische psychiatrie
Twee benaderingen van het controle criterium ................................................................................. 26
Analyse....................................................................................................................................... 26
HC 8: De tbs-maatregel ............................................................................................................... 31
Wat is ‘ter beschikking stelling’ (tbs) ................................................................................................ 31
Traject van binnen naar buiten ......................................................................................................... 33
Weigerende verdachte .................................................................................................................... 34
HC 9: Risicotaxatie ...................................................................................................................... 35
Waarom doen we risicotaxaties? ..................................................................................................... 36
Hoe schatten we risico’s in? ............................................................................................................ 36
Huidige uitdagingen ........................................................................................................................ 38
Biases ........................................................................................................................................ 38
Implentatie ................................................................................................................................. 38
Aandacht voor subgroepen .......................................................................................................... 38
Beschermende factoren .................................................................................................................. 39
HC 10: Gedwongen hersenscans en nemo tenetur ........................................................................ 41
Diagnostiek .................................................................................................................................... 41
Risicotaxatie ................................................................................................................................... 41
Hc 11: Ervaringsdeskudnige / q&a ................................................................................................ 44
Artikelen toerkeningsvatbaarheid ................................................................................................ 45
Toerekening in tweedracht, een juridisch-gedragskundig perspectief ................................................. 45
Gesprekskader............................................................................................................................ 45
Casus Bram & Willem .................................................................................................................. 45
Ten slotte .................................................................................................................................... 47
Een juridisch criterium voor de ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid: Een uitspraak van het Gerechtshof Den
Haag geanalyseerd ......................................................................................................................... 47
AI en risicotaxatie: drie kernvragen voor strafjuristen......................................................................... 49
Risicotaxatie met AI ..................................................................................................................... 49
Hoe kom je van voorspelling naar rehabilitatie? ............................................................................ 51
Klare taal ........................................................................................................................................ 51
Risicocommunicatie ................................................................................................................... 51
Methode ..................................................................................................................................... 52
Invloed van risicocommunicatie op besluitvorming....................................................................... 52
Artikelen gedwongen geestelijke gezondheidszorg ....................................................................... 53
De invoering van artikel 2.3 Wet forensische zorg .............................................................................. 53
Inleiding ...................................................................................................................................... 53
Verschillen tussen art. 2.3 Wfz en art. 37(oud) Sr .......................................................................... 53
Toepassing in de praktijk ............................................................................................................. 53
rol van Minister van justitie en Veiligheid ...................................................................................... 54
Civielrechtelijke afdoening bij ernstige delicten ............................................................................ 54
Herziening van het forensisch zorgkader ...................................................................................... 55
Gekkenhuis of poppenkast: over de rol van de psychiatrische behandeling in het veilig houden van de
toekomstige maatschappij .............................................................................................................. 55
Terbeschikkingstelling ................................................................................................................ 55
Stoornis en gevaar. Een aanzet tot onderzoek naar een alternatief voor tbs ........................................ 55
Stoornis en recidiverisico ............................................................................................................ 56
Normatieve knelpunten van de bestaande tbs-regeling ................................................................. 56
Een beveiligingsmaatregel zonder stoornisvereisten: drie onderzoeksrichtingen ............................ 57
Tbs en stoornis: Enkele overwegingen voor de wetgever .................................................................... 58
Knelpunt 1: Art. 5 lid 1 onder e EVRM ............................................................................................ 58
Knelpunt 2: De verdedigingspositie van verdachten ...................................................................... 59
Knelpunt 3: verhouding tussen oplegging en tenuitvoerlegging tbs ................................................. 59
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller JorisJan. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.37. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
