100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LPL4802 October November PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024 $2.71   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LPL4802 October November PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024

 8 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

LPL4802 October November PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024 ;100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations and Solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on ...(.+.2.5.4.7.7.9.5.4.0.1.3.2)........... QUESTION 1 (ESSAY) NATURE AND ASSESSMENT OF NON-PATRIMONIAL LOSS AND ...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 28  pages

  • October 24, 2024
  • 28
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
LPL4802
PORTFOLIO SEMESTER 2 2024
UNIQUE NO.
DUE DATE: 25 OCTOBER 2024

, LPL4802

October November Portfolio Semester 2 2024

Unique Number:

Due Date: 30 October 2024

Law of Damages

Question 1

Introduction

In the South African law of delict, damages can be classified into two broad categories:
patrimonial loss, which refers to pecuniary or financial harm, and non-patrimonial
loss, which covers injuries that cannot be quantified in monetary terms, such as pain,
suffering, and shock. This essay will examine the requirements for a successful claim
for shock as a head of damage for non-patrimonial loss, with reference to the case
Komape and Others v Minister of Basic Education and Others 2020 (2) SA 347
(SCA). Additionally, it will critically analyse the court’s reasoning for dismissing
constitutional damages as a claim in addition to common law damages.

1.1. Claiming for Shock as a Head of Non-Patrimonial Loss

Non-patrimonial loss, such as shock, is considered a form of psychiatric injury that a
plaintiff may suffer as a result of a wrongful act. In order to successfully claim for shock,
the plaintiff must prove several key elements in accordance with delictual principles:

A. Wrongfulness

The first requirement is wrongfulness. This means that the act or omission by the
defendant must be unlawful in the sense that it infringes a legally protected interest of
the plaintiff. In the case of Komape, the court had to assess whether the defendants,
including the Minister of Basic Education, acted wrongfully in failing to provide adequate

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LIBRARYpro. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $2.71. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82388 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$2.71  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart