LJU4801 October November (PORTFOLIO ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024
45 views 0 purchase
Course
Legal Philosophy (LJU4801)
Institution
University Of South Africa
Book
Legal Philosophy
LJU4801 October November PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024 ;100% TRUSTED workings with detailed Answers for A+ Grade. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on +/ 2/ 5/ 4 /7 /7 /9 /5 /4 /0 /1 /3 /2 .
lju4801 october november portfolio semester 2 2024
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
Edition:
ISBN:
Edition:
More summaries for
LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024 Actual Questions with detailed correct answers100% satisfaction guarantee
LJU4801 Semester 2 PORTFOLIO 2024
LJU4801 Portfolio (OCTOBER/NOVEMBER) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024
All for this textbook (26)
Written for
University of South Africa
Legal Philosophy (LJU4801)
All documents for this subject (15)
Seller
Follow
EduScript
Reviews received
Content preview
LJU4801
OCT/NOV PORTFOLIO 2024
UNIQUE NO.
DUE DATE: 30 OCTOBER 2024
, Question 1
In this scenario, different philosophical approaches to ethics can help analyze the
actions of Mark Pachio and the reactions of both teams, Shibobo FC and Maluti FC.
Below, I'll outline three primary ethical approaches: consequentialism, deontology, and
virtue ethics, as they apply to the situation. Then, I'll provide an evaluation of which
approach may be most suitable in this context.
1. Consequentialism (Utilitarianism)
Consequentialism, particularly utilitarianism, evaluates the morality of an action based
on its outcomes. From this perspective, an action is morally right if it leads to the
greatest happiness or least harm for the most people involved. In Pachio’s case, his
deliberate handball may be considered a calculated action aimed at achieving the best
outcome for his team, Shibobo FC. By preventing the goal, Pachio gave Shibobo a
better chance to reach the semi-finals, which they ultimately did after winning the shoot-
out.
Shibobo FC’s perspective aligns with consequentialist reasoning. The team might argue
that Pachio’s action, though against the rules, was justified by the positive outcome for
Shibobo – advancing to the semi-finals. From their point of view, the handball's benefits
outweighed the harm, especially since Pachio faced an immediate penalty for his
actions (a red card and a penalty kick), which balanced the scales of fairness in their
eyes.
However, from Maluti FC’s perspective, this action led to an unfair disadvantage.
Despite the penalty, they believe the act broke the integrity of the game by introducing
dishonesty, thus viewing the action as detrimental to fair play values.
2. Deontological Ethics (Duty-Based)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller EduScript. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.81. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
