Understanding Prejudice: an Interdisciplinary Perspective on Intergroup Relations (202300044)
All documents for this subject (3)
Seller
Follow
kaaskop16
Content preview
Samenvatting
Understanding
Prejudice
,Hoorcollege 1 - Introduction and Social Identity Theory
Audit test in retail market
● Subordinate-male target hypothesis = out-group men are more discriminated
Group formation
● Categorization process is a central component of Social Identity Theory
○ Evolutionary perspective: necessary to distinguish friend and enemy
○ Cognitive perspective: necessary to process large amount of
information
Categorization
● People search actively for information
● People simplify processing all that information by ignoring certain differences
and emphasizing (or even exaggerating) certain similarities of that information
SIT experiment 1: non-social stimuli
● Tajfel: how do people deal with categories?
● People have to rate non-stimuli
Non-social versus social stimuli
● Categorization of non-social stimuli: similarities within groups (homogeneity)
and differences between groups are over-emphasized
● Can this be generalized to social stimuli?
SIT experiment 2: minimal group experiment
● Goal: manipulate social categorization as an independent variable
○ Step 1: generate social categorization on basis of a trivial criterion
○ Step 2: let participants give rewards to members of their own and the
other group
● Part 1: dot estimation task → how many dots do you estimate are in this
picture
● Part 2: rewarding people → give monetary reward to 2 people
○ Potential strategies
■ Fairness
■ Maximum joint profit
■ Maximum ingroup profit
■ Maximum difference in favor of in-group
○ Maximum difference in favor of in-group is mostly chosen
Conclusion minimal-group experiments
● Group formation leads to discriminatory behavior (in-group favoritism)
● Even if groups are formed on basis of a trivial category
● Tajfel: social categorization is a sufficient condition for intergroup bias
,Social Identity Theory
● Social categorization
○ Process of bringing together social objects or events in groups which
are equivalent with regard to an individual’s actions, intentions and
system of beliefs
○ Similar to categorization of non-social stimuli
■ Use of any characteristic available
■ Perceive more similarly within and more differences between
categories
○ Not just the basis of how we perceive the world, but also how we
perceive ourselves
● Social identity
○ Social identity is based the realization that one belongs to a social
category and the positive or negative evaluation association with this
membership
■ Are divisive and exclusive
■ Are context dependent
■ Have a cultural component: this turns a category into an identity
■ Include a judgment of the nature of people in a certain category
○ This is more than a minimal group. Social identities may thus have
even more powerful consequences in intergroup interaction!
○ Ascribed identity vs self-identification
● Social comparison
○ Through social comparison with other groups, people ty to evaluate
their group’s relative status
○ People strive for a positive social identity
■ People are more motivated to belong to a positively evaluated
group
○ They value their own group more than other groups (social
identification vs contra-identification)
● Psychological group distinctiveness
○ Need for belonging to a positively evaluated group but also need to be
distinct from others
○ People thus try to achieve a position of their group that is distinct and
positive
Understanding behavior
● People strive to belong to groups that have positive and distinct identities
● Social comparison:
○ Adequate social identity
■ Attempt to retain superiority
■ Attempt to enhance superiority
○ Inadequate social identity
■ Seek change
, ■ Are there cognitive alternatives?
● No: situation stable/legitimized → individual strategy
○ Individual mobility
○ (Intra-group comparison)
● Yes: situation not stable/legitimized → group strategy
○ Absorption
○ Change meaning of group traits
○ Compare on other dimension
○ Compare to the other group
○ Social competition
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller kaaskop16. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.