100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
AICP Law Cases Exam Study Guide Solutions $11.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

AICP Law Cases Exam Study Guide Solutions

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • AICP Law Cases
  • Institution
  • AICP Law Cases

AICP Law Cases Exam Study Guide Solutions Mugler v Kansas - ANSWER-1887, 14th amendment due process case which rules that Kansas could prohibit sale of alcohol based on police power. Welch v Swasey - ANSWER-1909, Boston can impose different height limits on buildings in different districts Eu...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 9  pages

  • October 29, 2024
  • 9
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • AICP Law Cases
  • AICP Law Cases
avatar-seller
Emillect
©EMILLECT 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YEAR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

FIRST PUBLISH OCTOBER 2024




AICP Law Cases Exam Study Guide

Solutions


Mugler v Kansas - ANSWER✔✔-1887, 14th amendment due process case which rules that Kansas could

prohibit sale of alcohol based on police power.


Welch v Swasey - ANSWER✔✔-1909, Boston can impose different height limits on buildings in different

districts


Eubank v City of Richmond - ANSWER✔✔-1912, A zoning ordinance establishing building setback lines

was held unconstitutional and not a valid use of the police power; violates the due process of law and is

therefore unconstitutional under the 14th amendment.


Hadacheck v Sebastian - ANSWER✔✔-1915, Supreme Court upheld Los Angeles case prohibiting

establishment of a preexisting brickyard declared a "public nuisance."


Pennsylvania Coal Company v Mahon - ANSWER✔✔-1922, Supreme Court indicated for the first time

that a regulation of land use might be a taking if it goes too far.


Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co - ANSWER✔✔-1926, Established zoning as a legal use of police

power by local government. The main issue in this case was "nuisance," and that a certain use near a


Page 1/9

, ©EMILLECT 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YEAR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

FIRST PUBLISH OCTOBER 2024




residence could be considered "a pig in a parlor." Argued by Alfred Betteman, future 1st president of the

ASPO.


Nectow v City of Cambridge - ANSWER✔✔-1928, Court found for Nectow and against a provision in

Cambridge's zoning ordinance based on the due process clause. However, it did NOT overturn Euclid.

This was the last zoning challenge to come before the Supreme Court until...


Berman v Parker - ANSWER✔✔-1954, Established aesthetics and redevelopment as valid public purposes

for exercising eminent domain. Washington D.C. took private property and resold to a developer to

achieve objectives of an established redevelopment plan.


Jones v Mayer - ANSWER✔✔-1968, Ruling that discrimination in selling houses was not permitted based

on the 13th Amendment and Section 1982 abolishing slavery and creating equality for all U.S. citizens.


Cheney v Village 2 at New Hope - ANSWER✔✔-1968, Legitimized planning unit development (PUD)

process.


Golden v Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo - ANSWER✔✔-1972, NY State Court of Appeals case

that upheld a growth control plan based on the availability of public services. Case further emphasized

the importance of the Comp Plan and set the scene for nationwide growth management plans.


Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v Volpe - ANSWER✔✔-1971, Established hard look doctrine for

environmental impact review. Section 4(f) DOT Act of 1966 -- park use ok if no "feasible and prudent"

alternative and "all possible planning to minimize harm."


Page 2/9

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Emillect. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart