- ‘’It is never right to go against a principle unless there is a proportionate reason which would justify
it’’ - unless there is a proportionate reason, the morally good action is to follow the deontological
rule
- It lies between teleological and deontological
- Teleological means that right and wrong should be judged by the end outcome
- Deontological theories say that actions are either intrinsically right or intrinsically wrong
- Proportionalism holds that there are certain moral values that it can never be right to go against,
unless there is a proportionate reason which would justify it
- The proportionate reason should be based on the unique individual situation of the moral agent
- Hoose believes there are exceptions to absolute rules e.g. if a pregnancy will kill both the foetus and
the mother, it seems obvious that you should break the rules and abort the foetus
-In NL, certain acts are intrinsically evil – BUT the intention is important
- Considering the NL, if the foetus is growing in the fallopian tube, you cannot kill the foetus to save
the mother, but you can remove the fallopian tube to save the mother, even if it leads to the foetus
dying (double effect)
- Hoose believes that in this case the act of killing the foetus would be an ‘ontic evil’, not a ‘moral
evil’ – if killing the foetus will save the mother, and the mother can still have children, it does not
make sense to remove the fallopian tube instead
Distinction between an immoral act and pre-moral/ontic evil
1. Pre-moral Evil
- An act that is seen as objectively evil
- It does not consider the intention, the situation or the consequences of the action
- Proportionalists would object to the concept of pre-moral evil because there will sometimes be an
exception, a proportionate reason why this act may not be evil
- For example, if a surgeon, carrying out a surgery, cuts open human flesh with a knife, you would not
say, ‘that cut was morally evil’ – it depends on the surgeon’s intention or the consequences in doing
the cut
- Pre-moral evil is a physical wrong action (an action that breaks a theological deontological rule) but,
due to the nature of the fallen world we live in (ontic evil), it is not necessarily an immoral act
- The situation/intention/consequences need to be considered to ascertain if the pre-moral action
has a proportionate justification
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gorowiecprzemyslaw. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.