Exam (elaborations)
LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024
- Course
- Institution
TRUSTED WORK, EXPLANATIONS AND SOLUTIONS
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
istudyoo1
Content preview
LJU4801 OCTOBERNOVEMBER PORTFOLIO
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30
October 2024
Cheruiyotkelvin330@gmail.com
, LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO
(COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30
October 2024
Question 1 Read the following scenario and then answer the
question below: The football governing body is investigating Mark
Pachio’s deliberate handball during the quarter final match
between Shibobo FC and Maluti FC. Shibobo FC defender,
Pachio, used his hand to stop Mpho Motale’s header on the line
which would have sent Maluti FC through to the semi-final. While
Pachio was given a straight red card for his actions, his 'Hand of
God' intervention ultimately paid-off as Maluti FC missed the
resulting penalty and Shibobo FC went through to the semi-final
after winning the shoot-out. Shibobo FC does not consider that
handball as unfair or dishonest play but rather as an act for the
higher purpose of winning the game. Maluti FC, however, sees
the handball as unfair play which is inconsistent with the fair play
code. 1. Discuss the different philosophical approaches being
used here (NB apply the approaches to the set of facts). In your
substantiated opinion, which approach is the correct one? Your
answer should not exceed 1250 words. (25) [25] Question 2 Read
the following scenario and then answer the question below: In the
case of R v Sachs 1953 (1) SA 392 (A) the Appeal Court said the
following: [339 H – 400 D]
Philosophical Approaches to Mark Pachio’s Handball
In this scenario, we see two competing perspectives on Pachio's handball during the quarter-final
match:
1. Shibobo FC’s Perspective: They believe Pachio’s actions were for the "higher purpose"
of winning the game, viewing the handball as a strategic decision to prevent a goal.
2. Maluti FC’s Perspective: They view the handball as an act of unfairness, inconsistent
with the principles of fair play.
Several philosophical approaches can shed light on the ethical nature of Pachio's actions:
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller istudyoo1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now