Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Solution Manual For Intermediate Statistical Investigations 1th Edition by Nathan Tintle, Beth L. Chance, Karen Mc Gaughey, Soma Roy, Todd Swanson, Jill Vander Stoep Chapter 1-6 $17.99   Ajouter au panier

Examen

Solution Manual For Intermediate Statistical Investigations 1th Edition by Nathan Tintle, Beth L. Chance, Karen Mc Gaughey, Soma Roy, Todd Swanson, Jill Vander Stoep Chapter 1-6

 0 vue  0 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Intermediate Statistical
  • Établissement
  • Intermediate Statistical

Solution Manual For Intermediate Statistical Investigations 1th Edition by Nathan Tintle, Beth L. Chance, Karen McGaughey, Soma Roy, Todd Swanson, Jill Vander Stoep Chapter 1-6

Aperçu 4 sur 131  pages

  • 13 novembre 2024
  • 131
  • 2024/2025
  • Examen
  • Questions et réponses
  • Intermediate Statistical
  • Intermediate Statistical
avatar-seller
professoraxel
CHAPTER 1 i




SourcesofVariation i i




Sectioni1.1 1.1.10iColoriofiaisigniisitheiexplanatoryivariableiwithiwhite,iyellow,ian
diredibeingitheilevels.
1.1.1 B.
1.1.11
1.1.2 Bi&iC.
1.1.3 A. ObservediVariatio Sourcesiofi Sourcesiofiu
1.1.4 C. niin: explainedi nexplainediv
1.1.5 E. f.iwhetheritheistudenti variation ariation
obeyeditheisign
1.1.6 B.
60.34iifi rigidilibrarian Inclusionicriteria a.icoloriofithei b.iwhetheritheisubjecti
1.1.7 predictedinumberi ofi usesi foriitemsi =
{ 92.19iifi eccentricipoet sign wasileft-
• c.itimeiofiday
1.1.8 handedioriright-
• e.iageiofisubject handed
a. Theiinclusionicriteriaiareihavingiaiclinicalidiagnosisiofimilditoimoder
d.iattitudeiofistudent
ateidepressioniwithoutianyitreatmentifouriweeksiprioriandiduringithei
study. e.iageiofisubject
1.1.12
b. Theipurposeiofirandomlyiassigningisubjectsitoitheigroupsiisitoim
akeigroupsiveryisimilariexceptiforitheioneivariablei(swimmingiwithido a. Theivaluei6.21irepresentsitheioverallimeaniquiziscore,i5.50irepresentsi
lphinsiorinot)ithatitheiresearchersiimpose.iVolunteeringiforiaigroupico thei groupi meani quizi scorei fori peoplei whoi usedi computeri notes,i and
uldiintroduceiaiconfoundingivariable. 6.92irepresentsitheigroupimeaniscoreiforipeopleiwhoiusedipaperinotes.
c. Itiwasiimportantithatitheisubjects iinitheicontroligroupiswimieveryi b. Weilookitoiseeihowifari6.92iandi5.50iareifromioneianotheriorifromi
dayiwithoutidolphinsisoithatithisicontroligroupidoesieverythingi(in- theioverallimeaniofi6.21itoidetermineiwhetheritheinote-
icludingiswimming) ithatitheiexperimentaligroupidoesiexceptithatiw takingimethodimightiaffectitheiscore.
henitheyiswimitheyidon’tidoiitiinitheipresenceiofidolphins.iWithoutith c. Theinumberi1.76irepresentsitheitypicalideviationiofi aniobserva-
isiweiwouldn’tiknowiwhetherijustiswimmingicausesitheidifferencei ni itionifromitheiexpectedivalue,iinithisicase,ifromitheioverallimean.iThein
theireductioniofi depressionisymptoms. umberi1.61irepresentsitheitypicalideviationiofianiobservationiaftericre
d. Yes,ithisiisianiexperimentibecauseitheisubjectsiwereirandomlyias- atingiaimodelithatitakesiintoiaccountiwhetheritheipersoniisiusingicomp
isigneditoitheitwoigroups. uterioripaperinotes.

1.1.9. d. Becauseitheistandardideviationiofitheiresidualsirepresentsitheileft-
ioverivariation,iweicaniseeithatiafteriincludingitheitypeiofinotesiasiani
Observedi variationi Sourcesiofi Sourcesiofiu explanatoryivariableiiniourimodelitheiunexplainedivariationihasibeeni
n: explainedi nexplainediv reducedi(downitoi1.61ifromi1.76).iThisitellsiusithatiknowingitheitypei
d.isubstantialireductioni variation ariation ofinote-takingimethodienablesiusitoibetteripredictiscores.
inidepressionisymptoms 1.1.13iRandomiassignmentishouldimakeitheitwoiigroupsiiveryisimila
riwithiregarditoivariablesilikeiintelligence,ipreviousiknowl-
Inclusionicriteria a.iswimmingiwithi • g.iproblemsiinithei iedge,iorianyiotherivariableiandithusilikelyieliminateipossibleiconfo
• b.imilditoimoderate dolphinsiorinot personalilivesiofit undingivariables.
depression heisubjectsiduringi
theistudy 1.1.14
• c.inoiuseiofiantidepres
santidrugsioripsychot • h.iillnessiofisu a. Thisitableishowsiusipossibleiconfoundingivariablesibutithenisho
herapyifouriweeksiprio bjectsiduringith wsithatisubjectsiinitheitwoigroupsiiareiiquiteiisimilariiwithiregardito
ritoitheistudy eistudy itheseicharacteristics,ithusirulingioutitheseipossibleiconfoundingiva
Design riables.
• e.iswimming b. Weiwouldiwantitheip-
• f.istayingionianiislandi valuesi toi bei large,i soi wei couldi sayi thatiweihaveilittleitoinoievidenc
foritwoiweeksiduringi eithatithereiisiaidifferenceiinimeaniage,iproportioniofimales,ietc.ibetw
theistudy eenitheitwoigroups.iWeiwantiourigroupsitoibeiveryisimilarigoingiintoith
eistudy,isoiaicausaliconclusioniisipossi-ibleiifi wei findiai smalli p-
valueiafteri applyingi theitreatment(s).
3

,4iiii CHAPTE R i 1i i SourcesiofiVariation

1.1.15iItiisilikelyithati3-itoi5-year-oldsimightihaveidifferentipreferenc- c. R2i=i11.1328/199.62i=i0.0558.iWeicaniinterpretithisibyisayingithati5
iesiwheniiticomesitoitoyioricandyithani12-itoi14-year- .58%iofitheivariationiinitheiperceivedileveliofiriskiisiexplainedibyiwh
olds.iTheiolderigroupi isi probablyi muchi morei likelyi toi preferi thei cand etheritheinameiofi theihurricaneiisimaleiorifemale.
yi overi thei toyai ndi thei oppositei couldi bei truei withi thei youngeri group.i d.i SSErrori=i199.62i−i11.13i=i188.49.
Wei wouldi not
seeithisidifferenceiifi theiresultsiofi allitheiagesiareicombineditogether. i
e. √ 188.4872/140i =i1.16.
0.28i ifimaleiname
Sectioni1.2 f.ii predictedihurricaneiriskiratingi=i5.29i+
{−0.28iififemaleinameii
,
1.2.1 B. SEiofiresidualsi=i1.16.
1.2.2 A,iD. 1.2.16
1.2.3 C. a. Theiexplanatoryivariableiisitheinote-takingimethodianditheire-
isponseivariableiisitheiquiziscore.
1.2.4 A.
b. Theieffectiofitakinginotesionipaperiisi0.71ianditheieffectiofitakingin
1.2.5 C.
otesionitheicomputeriisi−0.71.
1.2.6 D.
c.i SSModeli=i40i×i(0.712)i=i20.164.
1.2.7 B.
d.iR2i=i20.164/120.92i=i0.16675.iWeicaniinterpretiitibyisayingithati
1.2.8 Usingitheieffectsimodel,ibecausei4.48i+i0.65i=i5.13i(theimeani
16.675%iofitheivariationiofiquiziscoreiisiexplainedibyitheinote-
ofitheiscentigroup)iandi4.48i−i0.65i=i3.83i(theimeaniofitheinon-
takingimethod.
scentigroup),itheimodelsiareiequivalent.
1.2.9 e.i 120.92i–i20.164i=i100.756.

a. SSModel. f.ii √100.756/38i =i1.628. 0.71iifi usingipaperinotes
g.ii predictediquiziscorei=i6.21i+i .
b. SSError. {−0.71iifiusingicomputerinotesi
1.2.17
1.2.10
a. Becausei thei samplei sizesi ofi eachi groupi arei thei same,i thei samplei
a. R2i =iSSModel/SSTotali=i0.4651. sizeiofi eachigroupiisijustihalfi ofi theitotalisampleisize.
b. R2i =i1i−iSSError/SSTotali=i0.7111. ∑ (xi −ix)2 ∑ (yi −iy)2

1.2.11 b. allin
obsiiiiii
_i −i1 + alli_ iiiiii
nobsi − _1
( 2
yi −iy)
i1
a.i 8. ∑2 xi −ixi 2i +i∑ 2 i2

b.i 6i–i8i=i–2,i10i–i8i=i2. = alliobs(i i )̅
ni −i1
alliobs(i i ̅) 1
_
( _
2 )2
c.ii74. ∑alliobs(xii −i x̅)2i +i∑alliobs(yii −i y̅)2
d.i 40. =( )
ni−i2
e.ii34.
f.i 0.5405. Takingitheisquareirootiweigeti
⎛i∑
√ ∑ alliobs (x ii −i x̅) 2i +i∑ alliobs (yii −i y̅) 2
ni−i2
̅ 2 i∑ (y ii −i y̅ )ii2⎞
i n(x ii −i x)iii
1.2.12 n

a. Thei explanatoryi variablei isi thei typei ofi testingi environment;i it Useisumifromi1itoin:i 1 ⎜ +i ⎟
isicategorical. 2iii=1 n −i1
_ i=1i
⎝ ni −i1iiii
b. Theiresponseivariableiisitheitestiscore;iitiisiquantitative. 2 ⎞ n 2 2 n⎠
⎛i n 2 n 2 2
i∑ (x ii−i x̅)iii+i ∑ (y ii−i y̅)ii i∑ (x ii−i x̅)iii+i ∑ (y ii−i y̅)ii
c. Theitwoilevelsiareiquietienvironmentiandidistractingienvironment.
2

=i _1iii=1 i=1 ⎟
i=i i=1
ni−i2
i=1
1.2.13 ⎝ n —i1 ⎠
2 i
a. SSTotali wouldi probablyi bei largeri withi thesei 10i subjectsi because n 2 n 2



i∑(xii−i x)iii
̅ +i ∑(yii−i y)ii̅
withitheiwideivarietyiofiagesithereiwouldiprobablyibeimoreivariabilityii i=1 i=1
Takingi thei squarei root,i wei get n —i2 .
nitheitestiscores.
b. SSModeliwouldiprobablyibeitheisameibecauseiitiwouldistillirepre-
isentitheidifferenceibetweenitestingienvironments. Sectioni1.3
c. SSErrori wouldi probablyi bei largeri becausei therei wouldi probablyi 1.3.1 D.
beimoreivariabilityiinitheitestiscoresiwithinieachigroupidueitoitheivaria 1.3.2 A.
bilityiiniages.
1.3.3 D.
1.2.14 Thei variancei ofi thei scoresi ini thei distractingi environmenti isi 2.5
1.3.4 A.
anditheivarianceiofi theiscoresiinitheidistractingienviro_ nmentiisi6.iThe
squareirootiofi theiaverageiofi theseitwoivariancesiisi√4.2_ 5i =i2.06.iThe 1.3.5 A.
SSErroriisi34,isoitheistandardierroriofitheiresiduals iisi√34/8i =i2.06. 1.3.6 Theivalidityiconditionsiareinotimetibecauseitheimaleisampleis
1.2.15 izeiisismallianditheidistributioniofitheinumberiofiflip-
flopsiownedibyitheimalesiisiquiteiskeweditoitheiright.
a. Theiexplanatoryivariablyiisiwhetheritheinameiofi theihurricaneiisi
maleiorifemaleianditheiresponseiisitheiperceivediriskilevel. 1.3.7ii
b. Thei effecti ofi namingi thei hurricanei Christinai isi 5.01i −i 5.29i = a.iii √(24.i382i +i 36.i992)/2i =i 31.33.
−0.28iandithei effecti ofi namingithei hurricanei Christopheri isi5.57i −i5 92.16i−i60.34
b.i ti= =i 4.06.
.29i=i0.28.iTheiSSModeliisi142(0.282)i=i11.1328. 31.33i√1/32i +i 1/32

, SolutionsitoiExercisesi 5

c. Yes,ithereiisistrongievidenceithatiaverageicreativityiisidifferentib 1.3.14
e-itweeni“rigidilibrarians”iandi“eccentricipoets”ibecauseitheit- a. Theipaperimethodimeaniisi6.92ipointsianditheicomputerimetho
statisticiisilargerithani2. dimeaniisi5.50ipoints,isoitheipaperimethoditendsitoigiveiaihigherisc
1.3.8ii ore.

a.i √(24.242i +i38.782)/2i =i32.34. −0.71iificomputeri
b. predictediquiziscorei=i6.21i+iiii ,
b.i ti=iiii 69.97i−i85.71iiiii =i−1.69. {i0.71iifipaper
32.34√1/24i+i1/24
c.i Thereiisinotistrongievidenceithatitheiaverageicreativityimeasur SEiofiresidualsi=i1.63.
e
isidifferentibetweenibiologyianditheaterimajorsibecauseitheiabsolutei c. Letiμcomputeribeitheipopulationiquiziscoreiwheninotesiareitakeni
valueiofitheit-statisticiisilargerithani2. usingiaicomputer,iandisimilarlyiforiμpaper.iTheihypothesesiareiH0:
iμcomputeri−iμpaperi=i0,ithatiis,itheilong-
1.3.9i Yes,ithereiisistrongievidenceithatitheilong- runimeaniscoresiwillibeitheisameiforibothimethodsiofinoteitakingivs.
runiaverageigameidu- iHa:iμcomputeri−iμpaperi≠i0,ithatiis,itheimeaniscoresiwillinotibeitheisamei
irationidiffersibetweenireplacementiandiregularirefereesibecauseith foritheitwoimethodsiofinoteitaking.
eidifferenceiinimeanigameilengthiisi8.03iminutesiandithativalueiisiw
d. ti=i2.27.iBecauseithisit-
ayioutiinitheirightitailiofitheinullidistribution.
statisticiisigreaterithani2,iitiappearsithereiisiaistatisticallyisignificanti
1.3.10 differenceiinitheimeaniquiziscoresibetweenitheitwoistudyingimethod
a.ii ti=iiii 196i.50i −i 188.47iiii =i2.64. s.
14.47i√1/43i+i1/48
e. Theit-statisticiisifariinitheirightitailiofitheinullidistribution.
b.iYes,ithereiisistrongievidenceithatitheilong-
runiaverageigameidu- f. Simulation-basedip-valuei≈i0.006;itheory-basedip-valuei=i0.0086.
irationidiffersibetweenireplacementiandiregularirefereesibecauseith g. Weihaveiveryistrongievidenceithatithereiisiaidifferenceiinitheimea
eit-statisticiisilargerithani2. niscoresionithisiquizibetweenitakinginotesionicomputeriandipaper,iw
1.3.11 ithitheipaperimethodihavingiaihigherimeaniscoreiinitheilongirun.
a. Weiwouldineedi10icards. 1.3.15
b. Weiwouldiwriteithei10iscoresionitheicards. a. Weiarei95%iconfidentithatitheimeaniscoreiforitheipaperinote-
c. Afteritheicardsiareishuffled,irandomlyisortithemiinitwoipilesiofi takingimethodiisibetweeni0.3832itoi2.4668ipointsihigherithanitheic
5,ilabelingioneipileiDianditheiotheripileiQ.iCalculateitheimeaniofi omputerinote-takingimethodiinitheilongirun.
theinumbersionitheicardsiinieachipileiandifindiandirecorditheidiffe b. Yes.iBecauseitheiintervaliisicompletelyipositiveiweihaveievidenc
rencei nimeansi(e.g.,iDi−iQ).iRepeatithisiprocessimany,imanyitimesi eithatiinitheilongirunitheipaper-
toicon-istructiainullidistributioniofitheidifferenceiinimeans. basedimethodipopulationimeaniisilarg-ierithanitheicomputer-
1.3.12 basedimethodipopulationimean.
a. Christopheri meani x̅Christopheri =i 5.57,i Christinai meani x̅Christina 1.3.16
i =i5.01,isoiChristopheritendsitoibeiperceivediasitheiriskieriname. a.iLetiμMusicYesibeitheipopulationimemoryiscoreiwhenipeopleiareil
b. predictedihurricaneirisk isteningi toi musici andi similarlyi fori μMusicNo.i Thei hypothesesi ar
eiH0:iμMusicYesi−iμMusicNoi=i0,ithatiis,imeanimemoryiscoresiwillibei
the
−0.28iifi Christina sameiregardlessiofiwhetheriorinotipeopleiareilisteningitoimusiciver
=i5.29i+ {i 0.28iifiChristopher ,iSEiofiresidualsi =i1.16. -
isusiHA:iμMusicYesi−iμMusicNoi<i0,ithatiis,imeanimemoryiscoresiwilli
be
theiloweriforipeopleiwhoiareilisteningitoimusicicompareditoithose
c. LetiμChristopher beitheipopulationiaverageiriskiratingiforihurricane whoiaren’t.
s
givenitheinameiChristopher,iandisimilarlyiforiμChristina.iTheihypoth a. Weiarei95%iconfidentithatitheimeaniperceivedithreatiratingifo
-
ritheinameiChristopheriisibetweeni0.1747iandi0.9450ipointsihi
iesesiareiH0:iμChristopheri−iμChristinai=i0,ithatiis,imeaniperceivediriski
gherithanithatiforitheinameiChristina,iinitheilongirun.
ratingsiareitheisameiregardlessiofiwhetheritheihurricaneiisinamed
iChristopherioriChristinainameiversusiHA:iμChristopheri−iμChristinai≠i b. Yes,ibecauseitheientireiintervali(foriChristopheriminusiChristi
0,ithatiis,imeaniperceivediriskiratingsidifferibasedioniwhetheritheihur na)iisipositiveiitishowsitheiobservedimeaniratingiforiChristopheri
ri-icaneiisinamed iChristopherioriChristina. isistatis-iticallyisignificantlyilargerithanithatiforiChristina.
d. Theiappletishowsiti=i2.87.iBecauseitheit-
statisticiisigreaterithani2,iitilooksilikeitheidifferenceiiniobservedimea
niperceivediriskiratingsiisistatisticallyisignificant.
e. Theit-
statisticiisifariioutiiiniitheiirightiitailiiofiitheiisimulated inullidistri
bution.
f. simulationip-valuei≈i0.006;itheoryip-valuei=i0.0048.
g. Weihaveiveryistrongievidenceithatitheiperceivedihurricaneithrea
tiforitheinameiChristopheriisidifferenti(moreispecifically,ilarger)ith
anitheiperceived ihurricaneithreatiforitheinameiChristina.
1.3.13

, b. Thereiisiailotiofioverlapibetweenitheidistributioniofitheiscoresibe-
itweenitheitwoigroups.iItilooksilikeitheidifferenceiinisampleimeansi
6i might inotibei1i
CHAPTERi significant.
i SourcesiofiVariation
c. ti=i–
1.28.iWithi|t|i<i2,ithereidoesinotiappearitoibeiaistatisticallyisignifica
ntidifferenceiinitheimeaniscoresibetweenitheitwoigroups.
d. Theit-statisticiisinotiinitheitailiofitheidistribution.
e. Simulation-basedip-valuei≈i0.111;iTheory-basedip-valuei=i0.1046.
f. Weidoinotihaveistrongievidenceithatilisteningitoimusicitendsitoih
inderipeople’siabilitiesitoimemorizeiwords.
1.3.17
a. Whereasit-
statisticsiandidifferencesiinimeansicanibeipositiveiorinegative,i thei valu
esi ofi R2i arei neveri negative.i Thei largeri thei valueiofiR2,itheibiggerithe
idifferenceibetweeniitheiitwoiisamples.iThere-
ifore,iwheniweiwantitoifindiR2ivaluesithatiareiasiextremeiasiouriobserve
d,i wei alwaysi looki ati thosei thati arei equali toi ori largeri thanitheiobser
vediR2.

b. UsingiR2iasitheistatisticiautomaticallyidoesiaitwo-
sideditestievenithoughiweiareilookingijustiinioneidirection.iTherefore
,itheip-
valueiisiaboutitwiceiasilargeiasiitishouldibeiforitestingiwhetherimusi
citendsitoihinderipeople’siabilityitoimemorize,iandiweishouldidividei
itibyi2.

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur professoraxel. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour $17.99. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

77858 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
$17.99
  • (0)
  Ajouter