Summary
Summary of the readings of Democracies, Autocracies and Transitions for the midterm
- Course
- Institution
Summary of the readings from lecture 1 to 5 , with important point of the articles.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
victormatthey
Content preview
Lecture 1Summary Linkage versus Leverage: Rethinking the
International Dimension of Regime Change
The paper "Linkage versus Leverage: Rethinking the International Dimension
of Regime Change" by Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way examines the roles
of international factors in influencing regime change and democratization
processes in various countries. The authors introduce two key concepts:
"linkage" and "leverage," which help to explain how external actors can
affect domestic political outcomes.
### Key Concepts:
1. **Linkage**: This refers to the connections between a country and the
international community, including economic ties, political relationships, and
social interactions. High linkage means that a country is closely connected
to the West through trade, investment, and cultural exchanges, which can
lead to greater external influence on its domestic politics.
2. **Leverage**: This concept pertains to the ability of external actors,
particularly Western governments, to influence a country's political situation
through coercive means, such as sanctions or military intervention. High
leverage indicates that external actors have significant power to compel a
regime to change its behavior.
### Main Arguments:
- **Impact of Linkage and Leverage**: The authors argue that countries with
high linkage, but low leverage may experience slow and diffuse
democratizing pressures. Even in the absence of direct external pressure,
these countries face scrutiny from international media and human rights
organizations, which can influence their domestic policies. Conversely,
countries with high leverage can be pressured more directly to democratize.
- **Case Studies**: The paper provides various case studies to illustrate how
linkage and leverage have played out in different contexts. For instance, the
authors discuss how intense lobbying and media coverage can lead to
significant changes in government behavior, as seen in the case of Haiti in
the 1990s.
- **Regional Differences**: The authors highlight that Western governments
are more likely to intervene in regions where they perceive greater stakes,
such as the Caribbean and Central Europe, compared to Sub-Saharan Africa,
where they often feel less pressure to act due to weaker lobbies and lower
perceived interests.
- **Domestic Considerations**: The paper emphasizes that even autocratic
regimes, which may not face direct external pressure, are still influenced by
international norms and expectations. Governments with a significant
number of western-educated technocrats are particularly sensitive to
international opinion, which can lead them to avoid large-scale abuse and
maintain credible political institutions.
,### Conclusion:
Levitsky and Way conclude that understanding the dynamics of linkage and
leverage is crucial for analyzing the international dimensions of regime
change. They suggest that policymakers should consider these factors when
formulating strategies to promote democracy abroad, recognizing that the
effectiveness of external pressure can vary significantly based on the
specific context of each country.
Overall, the paper provides a nuanced framework for understanding how
international relations shape domestic political landscapes, offering valuable
insights for scholars and practitioners interested in democratization
processes.
The authors, Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way, claim that their contribution
lies in providing a nuanced framework for understanding the international
dimensions of regime change, specifically through the concepts of "linkage"
and "leverage." They argue that existing studies on democratization have
often focused on direct forms of external intervention (leverage) without
adequately considering the broader, more subtle influences of international
connections (linkage).
### Key Contributions:
1. **Framework for Analysis**: By distinguishing between linkage and
leverage, the authors offer a more comprehensive analytical framework that
captures the complexity of international influences on domestic political
outcomes. This distinction allows for a better understanding of how different
countries respond to external pressures based on their unique contexts.
2. **Empirical Evidence**: The authors support their theoretical claims with
empirical evidence from various case studies, demonstrating how different
combinations of linkage and leverage can lead to varying democratization
outcomes. This empirical grounding enhances the credibility of their
arguments.
3. **Relevance to Policy**: The framework has practical implications for
policymakers and international organizations interested in promoting
democracy. By recognizing the importance of linkage, policymakers can
adopt strategies that foster deeper connections with countries, potentially
leading to more sustainable democratic changes.
### Academic Relevance:
The academic relevance of their work stems from several factors:
- **Filling a Gap**: The authors address a gap in the literature on
democratization by integrating the concepts of linkage and leverage, which
have often been treated separately. This integration enriches the theoretical
discourse on international relations and democratization.
, - **Interdisciplinary Approach**: Their analysis draws from various fields,
including political science, international relations, and sociology, making it
relevant to a broad audience of scholars and practitioners.
- **Implications for Future Research**: The framework encourages further
research into the dynamics of international influence on domestic politics,
prompting scholars to explore how different forms of linkage and leverage
can affect regime stability and change.
In summary, Levitsky and Way's work is significant for its theoretical
contributions, empirical support, and practical implications, making it a
valuable addition to the study of democratization and international relations.
Summary Democracy as a Universal Value
Amartya Sen's essay "Democracy as a Universal Value" explores the
evolution and significance of democracy in the contemporary world,
particularly in the context of the twentieth century. Here’s a detailed
summary of the key points and arguments presented in the essay:
1. Historical Context: Sen begins by acknowledging the profound changes
that occurred in the twentieth century, including the decline of empires, the
rise of nation-states, and the emergence of democracy as a dominant form
of governance. He emphasizes that these changes have reshaped global
politics and economics.
2. Democracy's Universal Appeal: Sen argues that democracy has gained
the status of being generally accepted as a "default" setting in governance.
While it is not universally practiced, the idea of democratic governance is
widely regarded as a positive and desirable form of political organization. He
notes that the burden of proof now lies with those who oppose democracy to
justify their stance.
3. Challenges to Democracy: The essay acknowledges that there are
challenges to the universality of democracy. These challenges come from
various cultural, political, and economic perspectives. Sen critiques the
notion of "Asian values," which suggests that Asian cultures prioritize
discipline over political freedom, arguing that this view oversimplifies the
rich and diverse historical traditions of Asian societies.
4. Cultural Diversity and Democracy: Sen highlights that diversity is a
characteristic of all cultures, including Western civilization. He cautions
against treating non-Western traditions as monolithic and emphasizes the
historical presence of democratic ideals in various cultures, including
ancient India and the Middle East.
5. Empirical Evidence: Sen calls for more systematic empirical studies to
understand the relationship between democracy and economic
development. He points out that there is no convincing evidence that
authoritarian governance is beneficial for economic growth. In fact, studies
show that political rights and economic performance can coexist and even
support each other.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller victormatthey. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.35. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now