This essay plan is a great tool to use when revising for your exams or end-of-topic tests.
This plan is graded at an A* level and includes the following format;
Intro
Point 1
Point 1 Counter-argument
Point 2
Point 2 Counter-argument
This plan includes up-to-date examples, whic...
Evaluate the view citizens can no longer feel confident that their rights in the UK are secure and
established.
[30 Marks]
Paragraph One- Judicial Review
Increasing use of judicial review by judges and courts to protect rights and liberties, to decide on
whether ministers are acting ultra vires.
November 2013, Court of Appeal upheld a legal challenge by five disabled individuals against the
decision to abolish the Independent Living Allowance, £300 million fund crucial for enabling severely
disabled people in Britain to live independently and access necessary care, ruling that the
government had failed to adequately assess the significant adverse impact on disabled individuals,
breaching its equality duty.
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (2017), where the UK Supreme Court
ruled that Parliament must be consulted before triggering Article 50 to initiate Brexit, emphasizing
the importance of parliamentary sovereignty in such matters.
Counter Argument:
Rights are not secure as justices (unelected officials) are making important decisions and rather
should be elected representatives, also most reviews end up siding up with government.
Privacy International v Investigatory Powers Tribunal (2019), the UK Supreme Court ruled that the
Investigatory Powers Tribunal's decision-making process regarding government surveillance was
subject to judicial review. Despite this ruling, judicial reviews often still result in outcomes favouring
the government's interests over individual privacy rights, highlighting concerns about the
effectiveness of such reviews in protecting civil liberties.
Legislate against- UK Supreme Court ruling in A v Secretary of State for the Home Department
(2004). Indefinite detention without trial of foreign terror suspects incompatible with the European
Convention on Human Rights, Parliament enacted the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005, introducing
control orders allowing restrictions on suspects without trial.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller singhbarunpal. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.82. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
