100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Art, Culture and Society - Individual Reflection $3.71
Add to cart

Case

Art, Culture and Society - Individual Reflection

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Art, Culture and Society year - Individual Reflection. Graded a 7.1.

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • December 9, 2024
  • 5
  • 2024/2025
  • Case
  • Dr. minnaert, dr. eliha and dr. boekestein
  • 7-8
avatar-seller
Individual Reflection

Art, Culture and Society (MC2V19002)



Name: Pim

Student ID number: …

E-mailadres: …

Date: November 1st, 2024

Tutor: Maartje …

Wordcount: 996

Page numbers: 5



In our research, through a comprehensive discourse analysis, we have observed a

diverse variety of sources– documentaries, academic articles, historic reports, and course

literature– that were relevant to our research and ultimately supported our analysis. The path

towards our collective final result can be ascribed to development on both individual and

collective levels. This individual reflection will address my personal growth, collaborative

contributions to academic and personal learning, evolved perspectives on the concepts of art,

culture, and society, and critically evaluate a cultural experience related to the course by

positioning it within the framework of different concepts and theories.

Reflecting on my personal growth, the previous few weeks of following the Art,

Culture, and Society course in relation to the collaborative research in the form of

establishing a full comprehensive discourse analysis have significantly influenced my

perspective on the concept of art, culture, and society. This implies that I have been able to

look beyond the physicality of art, culture, or societal subjects and instead consider them in

relation to, for example, certain forms of power or oppression, or the message being


1

, conveyed. In relation to the three different layers of discourses– the policy, public, and

professional discourse– in which we have laid a specific focus in the group paper, it has also

supported me greatly in the meaning-making process of a social phenomenon. It became

clearer how to understand the world by encountering different dynamics of a particular

process, including the causes and consequences. These three discourses share the idea that

our experience of the world around us is partly constructed by social processes that depend

on the society in which we live; social constructivism (Jørgensen & Phillips, 2002).

Collaboration with other people has contributed to my academic and personal learning

in various ways. Initially, our group consisted of two Media and Culture students and two

Cultural Anthropology students. This has produced fundamentally diverse academic insights

throughout both studies, resulting in a multidisciplinary focus on our topic as well as the

relevant course and found literature. On a personal level, we were able to review, improve,

and support one another’s judgments and perspectives on the different theories that were

applied in our case study. Moreover, working together with others has made it possible to

complete more work in less time, although this has come with a cost: the various components

that each person focused on required some additional effort to overlay them with one another.

The cultural experience I have chosen for the following part of this individual

reflection is my visit to the Dom Tower last month. It goes without saying that this was

highly applicable to our comprehensive discourse analysis of the Dom Tower’s contemporary

restoration. Normally, I would classify visiting a building like the Dom Tower as a type of

standard local tourism where visitors have to pay money in order to have such an experience.

In retrospect, I feel differently about my visit now. By placing this experience within the

context of ideas and theories from the course, this can be linked to the theory of week 1:

“Discourse and discursive acts,” in relation to the article “Discourse Analysis as Theory and

Method." by Marianne Jørgensen and Louise J. Philips (Jørgensen & Phillips, 2002). The



2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StuderenmetPim. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.71. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

48072 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$3.71
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added