SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS LAW TODAY; THE
ESSENTIALS TEXT & SUMMARIZED CASES,
CENGAGE, 13TH EDITION, ROGER LEROY
MILLER- CHAPTERS 1 - 25, COMPLETE TESTBANK
WITH ALL SOLUTIONS WELL EXPLAINED||
GUARANTEED A+
,1|Pag e
SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS LAW TODAY; THE ESSENTIALS TEXT & SUMMARIZED
CASES, CENGAGE, 13TH EDITION, ROGER LEROY MILLER- CHAPTERS 1 - 25,
COMPLETE TESTBANK WITH ALL SOLUTIONS WELL EXPLAINED|| GUARANTEED
A+
CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: Legal and Constitutional Foundations of Business
—Appendix to Chapter 1: Finding and Analyzing the Law
CHAPTER 2: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution
CHAPTER 3: Ethics in Business
—Appendix to Chapter 3: Code of Ethics Example
CHAPTER 4: Tort Law
CHAPTER 5: Intellectual Property Rights
CHAPTER 6: Internet Law, Social Media, and Privacy
CHAPTER 7: Criminal Law and Cyber Crime
CHAPTER 8: Agreement and Consideration in Contracts
CHAPTER 9: Capacity, Legality, and Enforceability
CHAPTER 10: Contract Performance, Breach, and Remedies
CHAPTER 11: Sales and Lease Contracts
CHAPTER 12: Performance and Breach in Sales and Lease Contracts
CHAPTER 13: Negotiable Instruments
CHAPTER 14: Banking
CHAPTER 15: Creditors’ Rights and Bankruptcy
CHAPTER 16: Agency Relationships in Business
CHAPTER 17: Employment Law
CHAPTER 18: The Entrepreneur’s Options
CHAPTER 19: Corporations
CHAPTER 20: Investor Protection, Insider Trading, and Corporate Governance
CHAPTER 21: Antitrust Law and Promoting Competition
,2|Pag e
CHAPTER 22: Consumer Law
CHAPTER 23: Personal Property, Bailments, and Insurance
CHAPTER 24: Real Property and Environmental Law
CHAPTER 25: International and Space Law
Table of Contents
Critical Thinking Questions in Features 1
Adapting the Law to the Online Environment 1
Critical Thinking Questions in Cases 2
Case 1.1 2
Case 1.2 3
Case 1.3 3
Chapter Review 4
Practice and Review 4
Practice and Review: Debate This 5
Issue Spotters 5
Business Scenarios and Case Problems 5
Critical Thinking and Writing Assignments 10
Critical Thinking Questions in Appendix Exhibit 1A–3 11
Exhibit 1A–3 11
Critical Thinking Questions in Features
Adapting the Law to the Online Environment
1. One observer has said that the American legal system should evaluate social media
companies based on how ―they affect us as citizens, not only [on how] they affect us as
consumers.‖ What is your opinion of this statement?
Solution
, 3|Pag e
The person who made this statement clearly sees a ―citizen‖ as having different motivations and
concerns than a ―consumer.‖ Presumably, a citizen is mostly concerned with the good of society
as a whole, and therefore would be open to the idea of government regulation that restricted the
negative influence of social media, regardless of the First Amendment. A consumer, by contrast,
would be primarily concerned with having a marketplace that offers the widest possible varieties
of freedom (of choice, of speech, etc.) and would for that reason be opposed to government
regulation of social media. There is, however, an argument to be made that the citizens that make
up a society benefit when the marketplace of ideas— whether they are subjectively
―positive‖ or ―negative‖—is allowed to flourish in the absence of government regulation.
2. Tim Cook, Apple‘s chief operating officer, has suggested that the United States Congress
should pass a law limiting the ability of Apple and other tech countries to keep consumer data
private. Why would a business executive make such a request?
Solution
Cook may have wanted to end a controversy that puts Apple squarely at odds with the federal
government. After all, large companies such as Apple rely on favorable treatment from the
government in regulatory matters, international trade agreements, and many other areas. Also,
large corporations such as Apple sometimes gain an advantage over competitors when their
industries are regulated. For example, Apple has significant resources with which to lobby
Congress for favorable treatment, and it is better positioned to bear the costs of regulation than
are other, smaller tech companies. Finally, Apple‘s position as a champion of consumer privacy
would be damaged if it ―caved‖ and changed its stance without being forced to do so by a new
federal law.
Critical Thinking Questions in Cases
Case 1.1
1. What ―dangerous conditions‖ might have prompted the city to enact the ordinances at
issue in this case? Why?
Solution
As noted in the facts of the case, both ordinances at issue included an extensive rationale for their
adoption, stating essentially that a geographically small city has the right to restrict a
business from operating within the city when the restriction is for the safety of the city‘s citizens
and visitors.
