100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary AQA A LEVEL History: NEA (German Unification) A* Complete Notes $37.37
Add to cart

Summary

Summary AQA A LEVEL History: NEA (German Unification) A* Complete Notes

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

I remember when I was doing my A Levels there weren't a whole lot of resources particularly when it came to A Level History coursework. So I compiled the key areas that I focused on to achieve an A* in my AQA A LEVEL HISTORY NEA (German Unification) in 2024, allowing you to achieve the A* you deser...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 37  pages

  • Yes
  • December 25, 2024
  • 37
  • 2024/2025
  • Summary
avatar-seller
NEA GUIDE

Examiners Report
● DO: well argued, focused, effectively structured w/ powerful evaluative line for both
sources + interpretations, interpretations linked to Q, clear footnotes/bibliography.
● DON'T: fail to address date full date range, struggle to provide judgement in response
to set Q, use sources and interpretations simply to offer uncritical commentary, don't
just describe views of others and neglect your own judgement.
● Footnotes, appendix, bibliography = NOT part of word count (4500).
● AO1 - DON'T: try to include as much factual info within word limit eg. lengthy
descriptions/contextual overviews only obscure higher level skills + weaken sense of
powerful, focused argued response; DO: be selective with supporting material.
● AO2: highest differentiator between high + low marks = effective evaluation. DON'T:
use sources simply as evidence, take them at face value w/ little attempt to argue
value of content or provenance; DO: better responses linked material in the source to
particular aspect of argued response for AO1 and came to a clear judgement about
how valuable the source was as evidence, include sources in appendix.
● AO3: key element is effective evaluation - DO: quote short sections of chosen
interpretation, evaluate contrasting interpretations, recognise strengths and
weaknesses of each interpretation to arrive at firm judgement as to how far they are
convinced by each - link academic profile of a historian to the views expressed within
+ show that historical interpretation is not produced in a vacuum and that various
factors may influence the extent to which that particular view is deemed convincing.

AO2: Tip to link source = attach it at the end of the last paragraph as a piece of evidence
then in the next paragraph treat it as analysis of the source and what it shows about your
previous or next argument eg. “The value of X is significant as it highlights” - Evaluate
provenance, tone, content, argument.
1. Source must be significant to the topic + best if it has a clear argument as this will
give you something to make a substantial judgement about.
2. Find lots of detail about the author of the source, their motivation and credibility,
audience it addressed, time produced (social, economic, political, religious context).
3. No limit to the length of source but get a handle on the content + argument - be wary
of very long sources which require too many words to cover all ins and outs.

AO3: Tip to link historians = “It is important at this point to assess two of the key historians
writing about X. Both were (writing at the same time?)… but differ in their evaluation of…” -
You need to make judgements about the comparative validity of different interpretations.
1. Make your point about the issue you are writing about.
2. Explain your historian’s overall argument and how it relates to your point/argument.
3. Look at aspects of the argument + supporting the view w/ evidence that backs up the
point being made.
4. Look at aspects of the argument + illustrate weaknesses of the argument using
evidence that contradicts the argument, and use this evidence to counter the
historian’s view.
5. Compare aspects of one historian’s view with that of another and using supporting
evidence argue why one interpretation is more convincing than the other.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gradesxpress. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $37.37. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

50843 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$37.37
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added