Summary
Summary Complete Study Guide for Legal Epistemology Unit
- Course
- PHIL
- Institution
- University Of Notre Dame
Complete Study Guide for Legal Epistemology Unit
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Complete Study Guide for Legal EpistemologyCourse year: 2022-2023
,Outline
1. Introduction: error
2. Error distribution: standard of proof especially Bard, Presumption of innocence, and
burden of proof
3. Rule of evidence: silence and confession
4. Rules of procedure (appeal)
, Chapter 1
Thinking About Error in the Law
A Road Map
- Core aims of criminal justice system
- Find out the truth about a crime and avoid false verdicts (error reduction)
- Error distribution: we all agree that convicting an innocent person is more
costly than acquiring a guilty one, so a bunch of doctrine and procedure has
grown in the common law about how to conduct trials so as to make it more
likely that, when error occurs, it will be false acquittal and not false
conviction
- miscellaneous/non epistemic policy value: concerns that do not explicitly
address trial error but focus on other issues important to the criminal justice
system (e.g. protection of the rights of the accused, social goods such as
sanctity of marriage in the sense that spouses cannot testify against each
other)
- Most scholars say finding out the truth is the most important of the three
- Epistemology, for Laudan, is the study of whether systems of investigation that
claim to be seeking the truth are well engineered to lead to true beliefs about the
world
- Despite the almost universal acceptance of the premise that a criminal trial is a
search for the truth, there’s uncertainty and confusion about whether the multiple
rules of proof, evidence, and procedure enhance or prevent discovery of truth
- Legal epistemology involves:
- 1. Determining which existing rules promote and which hinder truth seeking
- 2. Proposing changes in existing rules to eliminate or modify those rules that
hinder truth finding
- Legal epistemology is diWicult b/c non-epistemic values clash with epistemic
values:
- If we were serious about error reduction and recognize that juries reach
wrong verdict a remedy would be to put have a system of appeals for
acquittals and convictions
- We have that for latter, not former because clashes with double jeopardy
(can’t be tried for the same crime twice)
The Book as a Thought Experiment
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller josuemendoza. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
55534 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now