100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Knowledge Representation Quiz / Practise Exam with Answers $7.43
Add to cart

Other

Knowledge Representation Quiz / Practise Exam with Answers

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Practise exam with answers for the course Knowledge Representation, MSc AI.

Preview 2 out of 13  pages

  • December 30, 2024
  • 13
  • 2022/2023
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Knowledge Representation: Practise exam


1. In a proof by contradiction, such as DPLL or tableau, I can prove that a formula F is entailed
by a knowledge base KB by showing that:
● the formula F is unsatisfiable, which implies that it must be entailed by the KB.
● the knowledge base KB and the formula F are together unsatisfiable.
● the knowledge base is unsatisfiable, which implies that the formula F must be entailed.
● the knowledge base KB and the negation of the formula are unsatisfiable.

2. A calculus is called complete w.r.t. the semantics of a logic if, and only, if
● all the formulas it proves are semantically entailed.
● it proves all the correct formulas in finite time.
● it can prove all the semantically entailed formulas.
● all the formulas it proves are tautologies.

3. A calculus is called sound w.r.t. the semantics of a logic if, and only, if
● all the formulas it proves are semantically entailed.
● it proves all the correct formulas in finite time.
● it can prove all the semantically entailed formulas.
● all the formulas it proves are tautologies.

4. A formula is in clause normal form if it is a: .. of .. of …
1: conjunction of 2: disjunctions of 3: literals

5. The semantics (meaning) of a formula in Propositional Logic is determined as:
● a truth value
● a numeric value
● multiple choice
● set membership

6. Consider ((- A v -B) -> (A -> -B)) & (A v B). Which of the following statements are true?
● The sentence is not valid, and thus also not satisfiable
● The sentence is not valid, and thus a contradiction
● The sentence is neither valid, nor satisfiable, nor a contradiction
● The sentence is satisfiable, but not valid
● The sentence is valid, but not satisfiable

7. In the following truth table X1, X2 and X3 stand for possible truth value:




Which of the following statements is correct (multiple answers possible):
● X1 =True, X2 = False, X3 = True, X3 = False, X2 = True, X1 = False



1

, Knowledge Representation: Practise exam


8. Consider the pair of sentences: (-A v -B) -> -(A & B) and ((A -> B) v (B -> C). Which of the
following statements is true? → create truth tables
● There is not enough information to know whether they are equivalent
● Both statements are logically equivalent
● The first statement entails the second, but not vice versa
● They are not logically equivalent

9. Weighted partial MAXSAT formulas. Consider the following statements about geese:
1. all geese are white
2. geese often have two legs
3. It is very likely that a goose is either white or has two legs or both
4. if a goose does not have wings, it cannot fly.

And the following variables:
W stands for goose has wings
X stands for goose is white
Y stands for goose has two legs
Z stands for goose can not fly

Which of the following statements is a faithful representation of the knowledge described
above? → here, ∞ means that its opposite must be true. By satisfying -X, you get the costs.
● F= X & (X v Y, 0.4) & (-Y,5) & (Z v W)
● F= (-X,∞) & (X v Y, 0.4) & (-Y,5) & (Z v W,∞)
● F= (X,∞) & (-(X v Y), 0.4) & (Y,5) & (-(Z v W),∞)
● F= (X,-∞) & (X v Y, 0.4) & (Y,-5) & (Z v W,-∞)

10. Use DPLL procedure to prove or disprove satisfiability of the formula
(X v Y v Z) & ( X v -Y) & (Y v -Z) & (Z v -X) & (-X v -Y v -Z). Label each step which part of the
algorithm you have used.

X = True
(Y v -Z) & Z & (-Y V -Z)
Unit rule: Z = True
Y & -Y → contradiction
Backtracking to beginning: X = False
(Y v Z) & -Y & (Y v -Z)
Y = False
Z & -Z → again contradiction and so UNSAT

11. Give a pseudocode description of GSAT




2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller tararoopram. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.43. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

48072 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$7.43
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added