100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Criminal Law Essay Outlines (First Class) $25.48   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Criminal Law Essay Outlines (First Class)

1 review
 253 views  7 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Comprehensive and detailed first class Criminal Law essay outlines, from University College London (2018/2019)

Preview 1 out of 37  pages

  • Unknown
  • April 25, 2020
  • 37
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: john2628 • 4 year ago

avatar-seller
Sexual Offences
"Determining consent to any sexual activity would be easier if the legislation had defined the
terms 'agreement', 'freedom' and 'capacity' as they are used in Sexual Offences Act 2003, s.74,
and if it had clarified whether s.76 of the Act exhaustively stated the relevance of deceptions."
Discuss, with reference to the cases decided under the 2003 Act. [2018]

Intro
AF: Define terms more clearly  more prescriptive, introduces more legal certainty
CA: Leaving terms vague  allows jury to have more flexibility in interpreting to ensure just
outcome

Argument For

Existing ambiguities  need for legal certainty
 “Agreement”
o Does this include cases of conditional consent? Unclear and court had to clarify in
R v Assange

o Conditional consent: Extent to which condition has to relate to performance of act
 Assange v SPA: Held that use of condom relates to performance of act  if V
made condom use a condition of sex, then deception as to use of condom will
negate consent
 R v Linekar: Held that condition for money to be paid in return for sex, was
one that related to payment rather than sex itself  failure to pay did not
negate consent
 But this distinction in Linkear is highly arbitrary, can be argued that the
condition relates to V’s purpose for performing the act  thus this condition
cannot be viewed as completely distinct from the V’s consent

o Deceptions that are not under s.76 – do they come under s.74, and if they do, do they
come under agreement?

 “Freedom”
o Distinction between reluctant acquiescence and mere submission (the two categories
laid out in R v Olugboja) is extremely unclear  need to clarify
 Implication of this lack of clarity is significant because reluctant
acquiescence is generally held to be consent, while mere submission is not 
lack of clarity gives jury a lot of flexibility in determining which category
V’s consent falls into  has implications on whether V consented in the eyes
of the law  and thus whether D is liable
 Allowing jury to determine this with no guidance from the law allows too
much flexibility  may lead to inconsistent case rulings

o Distinction may lead to unfair outcomes
 If we say reluctant acquiescence is consent, we are accepting that a degree of
felt pressure is lawful  unfair to V

 Application of subjectivity: Victim 1 and victim 2 have different states of
mind for the same pressure

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller firstclasslawnotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $25.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62555 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$25.48  7x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart