100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Describe and evaluate research into the influence of misleading information on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony (16 marks) $5.15
Add to cart

Essay

Describe and evaluate research into the influence of misleading information on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony (16 marks)

6 reviews
 7150 views  9 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Describe and evaluate research into the influence of misleading information on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony (16 marks). This is essentially a full 16-mark question which is all you need for the exam, you can also use it to answer all 4,6,8, 12 mark questions in the exam all you have to do i...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • May 21, 2020
  • 2
  • 2017/2018
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • Unknown

6  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: sunyaali28 • 7 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: shannonblack107 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: Gizmo2005 • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: rubysavage810 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: amymaurer456 • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: kapilvasuin • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
Describe and evaluate research into the influence of misleading information
on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. (16 marks)
Eye witness testimony is the evidence given by a witness to a significant event such as a
crime or serious accident. Leading question can affect eye witness testimony. A Leading
question is a question which is asked in such a way to suggest an expected answer they also
wrongly imply that something happened when it hasn’t, following an EWT.
Loftus and Palmer (1974) study wanted to investigate how leading question affected (recall)
estimate of speed. Experiment 1-Loftus and Palmer showed 45 uni students a video of a car
crash and the leading question (critical question) they asked the participants was, how fast
were the cars going when they ‘hit’ other each other. Loftus and Palmer found as the
increased aggression in the verb (the charge) increased so did the mean speed estimate.
Participants given the verb smashed gave the highest estimate (40.5 mph), whereas the
verb contacted gave the lowest speed estimate (31.8 mph), this study shows how leading
question could influence memory recall.
The second part of the experiment was the repetition of the first experiment and
participants were asked 1 week later whether they saw witnessed any broken glass.
Participants who originally heard the verb ‘smashed’ were more likely to report broken glass
though there wasn’t any. This experiment shows how misleading information can change
the way information is recalled and or stored.
Post event discussion can also contaminate EWT. This is when co witnesses of a crime
discuss with each other and combine misinformation from other witnesses with their
memories. Fiona Gabbert et al study into post event discussion studied participants in pairs.
The pairs watched a different video from the same event, both participants then discussed
what they had seen before recall test. The results found 71% of witnessed who had
discussed the event went onto mistakenly recall items acquired through discussion, whereas
control group was 0%. They call this phenomenon memory conformity.
A strength of Loftus and Palmer research is that it is considered scientific. This is as the study
was done in a high control lab setting, which allowed for the researcher to have high control
over extraneous variables. Advantage of the high control was that it allowed for the
researcher to establish cause and effect and to make sure that the IV (leading question) was
the only thing affecting the DV (recall). Moreover, another advantage due to the lab setting
was the researcher could replicate the study. Repeat studies show reliability through
acquiring matching results and the researcher could conclude that misleading information
and leading question affect recall. However, despite the high level of control lab studies lack
ecological validity as they are done in artificial setting. Therefore, results gained from Loftus
and Palmers study would lack external validity as you would be unable to generalise findings
to other people and situations.
Another strength of Loftus and Palmers research is real life application. For example, Loftus
(1975) believes that leading question can have such a distorting effect on memory that
police officers need to be very careful about how they phrase their question when

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Zedzpsychology. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.15. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

50843 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.15  9x  sold
  • (6)
Add to cart
Added