100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Outline and evaluate Milgrams research into obedience 16 marks $5.79   Add to cart

Essay

Outline and evaluate Milgrams research into obedience 16 marks

11 reviews
 5425 views  8 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Outline and evaluate Milgrams research into obedience. This is essentially a full 16-mark question which is all you need for the exam, you can also use it to answer all 4,6,8, 12 mark questions in the exam all you have to do is break it down. (A level) Milgram

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • May 22, 2020
  • 2
  • 2017/2018
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • Unknown

11  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: caram48 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: shannonblack107 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: fpatel2398 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: howeaimee165 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: aditisharma • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: joshridley1 • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: rubysavage810 • 2 year ago

Show more reviews  
avatar-seller
Outline and evaluate Milgrams research into obedience. (16 marks.)
Obedience to Authority is a form of social influence when individuals follows a direct order
and person issuing the order is usually a figure of authority who has the power to punish
when obedient behaviour is not followed.
Milgram aimed to test the Germans are ‘different hypothesis.’ He recruited 40 male ppts,
aged between 20-50 to take part in the study. Milgrams used a volunteer sample he
advertised in a local newspaper for male ppts to part in his study and offered them $4.50 to
take part. Milgram used a confederate ‘Mr Wallace ‘and fixed the selection of roles so that
the confederate was always the ‘learner’ and the true participant was always the ‘teacher’
and experimenter wore white lab coat. He used a fake set up whereby the teacher was
instructed by an authority figure the experimenter to punish the learner (by electric shock)
for every incorrect response on the task (learning word pairs). The shocks ranged from 15V
labelled (‘slight shock’) and rose through 30 level to 450V labelled (‘danger severe shock).
AT 315 volts learner pounded on the wall and gave no response. Milgram was interested to
see how far the participants would go in order to comply with an unreasonable order from
an authority figure.
He found all participants continued to deliver the shocks up to 300V, 12.5% stopped at 300
volts and a staggering 65% continuing to 450V. Milgram concluding that Germans are not
different and in fact we are all capable of blind obedience to unjust orders due to the
setting.
A strength of Milgram’s study of obedience is that it has good external validity. For example,
Hofling (1966) conducted a study in a hospital. Nurses were telephoned by a doctor who
asked that they administered a drug to a patient. This order went against hospital
regulations in a number of ways; (1) nurses were not supposed to take instructions over the
phone, (2) the instructions were from an unknown doctor and (3) the dosage of the drug
was twice the that advised on the bottle. Nevertheless, 21 out of 22 (95%) nurses did as
request. Thus, this is a strength because the research demonstrates that obedience to
authority figures does occur in real-life settings.
A limitation of Milgrams study is the ethical issues associated with it. For example, Milgram
deceived his participants as he said the experiment was about memory test, when in fact he
was measuring obedience, and he pretended the learner was receiving electric shocks. In
addition, it was very difficult for participants with withdraw from the experiment, as the
experimenter prompted the participants to continue. Finally, many of the participants
reported feeling exceptionally stressed and anxious while taking part in the experiment and
therefore they were not protected from psychological harm. This is a limitation, as Milgram
did not respect his participants, some of whom felt very guilt following the experiment,
knowing that they could have harmed another person. However, it must be noted that it
was essential for Milgram to deceive his participants and remove their right to withdraw to
test obedience and produce valid results. Furthermore, he did debrief his participants
following the experiment and 84% of participants said that they were happy to have taken
part in the experiment.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Zedzpsychology. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.79  8x  sold
  • (11)
  Add to cart