, International Bachelor of LAW Program 2019 – 2020
Civil Procedure Case Law by 18024580 Page 2 of 10
LILJEBERG V. HEALTH SERVICES ACQUISITION CORP.
paras 849-852 and 859-870
Facts
Parties: J. Liljeberg (business promoter), Health Services Acquisition Corporation –
Presided: Judge Collins.
• Health Services Acquisition Corp. brought an action against J. Liljeberg to seek a
declaration of ownership
• Judge Collins ruled for Liljeberg
• Subsequently, Liljeberg could sell the hospital business to Loyola University
• Respondent learned that Judge Collins was a member of the Board of Trustees of Loyola
University
• The benefit of the Loyola University based on litigation before Judge Collins
• Respondent moved to vacate the judgement on the ground of 28 U. S. C. § 455 (a)
Preliminary questions
Should a judge recuse himself if his impartiality is reasonably questioned?
“Any justice, judge, or magistrate of the United States shall disqualify himself in any
proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” 28 U. S. C. § 455(a),
as amended. The goal of §455 is to avoid even the appearance of impartiality.
Supreme Court’s finding on Judge Collins’s Impartiality
The Supreme Court approves the district courts findings, i.e. that the judge did not know
Loyola’s interest during the trial. This is based on the following facts:
a. Judge Collins (JC) attended a meeting where interests were discussed days before the lawsuit
was filed, but ‘forgot’ about interest.
b. JC missed meeting which discussed trial. Minutes of meeting mailed to JC.
c. Regained actual knowledge on March 24 but did not recuse himself.
d. Did not acknowledge he knew about Universities interest.
Can a judge’s forgetfulness of “involvement in litigation” avoid the appearance of partiality?
“The judge's forgetfulness, however, is not the sort of objectively ascertainable fact that can
avoid the appearance of partiality. Hall v. Small Business Administration, 695 F. 2d 175, 179
(5th Cir. 1983). Under section 455(a), therefore, recusal is required even when a judge lacks
actual knowledge of the facts indicating his interest or bias in the case if a reasonable person,
knowing all the circumstances, would expect that the judge would have actual knowledge.”
– Chief Judge Clark.
Judge Collins inexcusable failure to disqualify himself. Para. 868: “It is, therefore,
appropriate to vacate the judgment […]”.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller 18024580. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.77. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.