100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Lecture 15. Dworkin’s theory of legal interpretivism and law as integrity $7.09   Add to cart

Class notes

Lecture 15. Dworkin’s theory of legal interpretivism and law as integrity

 39 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Lecture notes of 3 pages for the course Jurisprudence at QMUL (FIRST CLASS NOTES!)

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • July 2, 2020
  • 3
  • 2019/2020
  • Class notes
  • Unknown
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Lecture 15. Dworkin’s theory of legal interpretivism and law as integrity

Main focus of this lecture: Dworkin’s theory as developed in his book Law’s Empire (hereafter ‘LE’)

Legal disagreements
- Legal disagreements (i.e. disagreements about the law governing a case) are a common feature of the
legal practice.
- A distinction between theoretical and empirical disagreements
 Theoretical disagreements about law = disagreement about grounds of law.
 Empirical disagreement about law = disagreements as to whether those grounds are in fact
satisfied regarding a certain law.
- Dworkin: judges have theoretical disagreements about the law.

Law as an interpretive concept
- Law is an interpretive concept - Law is a practice which involves disputes about its interpretation.
- The interpretive attitude has two components:
(i) ‘[T]he assumption that the practice … does not simply exist but has value, … that it has a
point’ (LE, 47)
 E.g. not to be loud (e.g. hoovering) after 8pm. This has value as the point can be
to not disturb neighbours on Sundays.
(ii) The assumption that the requirements of the practice (i.e. the behavior it demands and
the judgments it warrants) are ‘sensitive to its point, so that the strict rules must be
understood or applied or extended or modified or qualified or limited by that point’ (ibid).
- Different kinds of interpretation
 Conversational interpretation
 ‘We interpret the sounds or marks of another person in order to decide what he has
said’ (LE, 50)
 This type of interpretation ‘assigns meaning in light of the motives and purposes
and concerns it supposes the speaker to have…’ (ibid)
 This is to trace a subjective aspect
 Scientific interpretation
 ‘[W]e say that a scientist first collects data and then interprets them’ (ibid). But
since scientific interpretation does not aim at discovering a purpose (but rather at
providing causal explanations), we might say that the phrase scientific
interpretation ‘is only a metaphor, the metaphor of data “speaking to” the scientist
in the way one person speaks to another…’ (LE, 51)
 Creative interpretation (most relevant)
 E.g. interpreting a social aspect
 Aims to ‘interpret something created by people as an entity distinct from them,
rather than what people say, as in conversational interpretation, or events not
created by people, as in scientific interpretation’ (LE, 50)
 Applicable, for example, to artistic work (poems, plays, paintings, etc.) as well as to
social practices (such as law)
 ‘[C]reative interpretation is not conversational but constructive’ (LE, 52). It is ‘a
matter of imposing purpose on an object or practice in order to make of it the best
possible example of the form or genre to which it is taken to belong’ (ibid). Note:
‘the history or shape of a practice or object constraints the available interpretations
of it; creative interpretation, on the constructive view, is a matter of interaction
between purpose and object’ (LE, 52).
 This is the type of interpretation going on in law

Dworkin’s distinction between concept and conceptions
- The contrast between concept and conceptions is ‘a contrast between levels of abstraction at which
the interpretation of the practice can be studied’ (LE, 71)
- Example: regarding courtesy, we may say that, for a certain community, ‘respect provides the concept
of courtesy and that competing positions about what respect really requires are conceptions of that
concept’ (ibid)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MxyWxri. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.09. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.09
  • (0)
  Add to cart