A 12 Page Summary Sheet of All 20 OCR Core Studies for Exam Paper 1, Also Including Brief Summaries of Each Area's Key Assumptions, Strengths, and Weaknesses. Each Study has a Summarised Aim, Sample, Method, Results, Evaluation etc. Use Viewable Pages to see if Work Well With Note-taking Style :)
Key summary on Milgram Study OCR A Level Psychology
Study Summaries for Biological Psychology Studies AS Level OCR
Study Summaries for Social Psychology Studies AS Level OCR
Alles voor dit studieboek
(6)
Geschreven voor
A/AS Level
OCR
Psychology
AS Unit G542 - Core Studies
Alle documenten voor dit vak (80)
3
beoordelingen
Door: katiepulley3 • 1 jaar geleden
Door: louisfkeen • 2 jaar geleden
Door: charlottegranger • 3 jaar geleden
Verkoper
Volgen
aislingwest
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
All Psychology Studies
Milgram:
Aims: To investigate what level of obedience would be shown when participants were
told lotus. by a figure of authority to administer electric shocks to another person.
Lake. To be able to quantify obedience.
Lake. To understand if Nazi soldiers are fundamentally different to normal people.
- 40 participants aged 20-50 volunteered via newspaper and paid $4.50
- Believed participating in a memory experiment as randomly decided ‘teacher’
- Shocked by the machine so truly believed electrocuting the ‘learner’
- Experimenter wore a white lab coat and urged them to continue i.e. ‘the
experiment requires that you continue’
- 100% shocked to 300 volts (recordings of screams began), and 65% to 450 volts
- Most were nervous and sweating, 14 had nervous laughter, 1 had violent seizure
- Shows why Nazi regime led people to obey because authoritative figure takes
blame and we feel inferior and destructive obedience
- Agentic state induced as experimenter took responsibility off of the participant
- All male, ethically wrong, lab experiment, independent measures design,
applicable to understanding the destructive obedience of others
Bocchiaro:
Aims: To study the people who disobey and who blow the whistle.
Lake. To understand the personal and situational factors involved in disobedience.
- 8 Pilot studies with 92 participants
- Volunteer sample at VU university with 149 undergrads (11 removed as
suspicious), with 96 women, 53 men
- 138 in the survey sample given detailed description of study and asked ‘what
would you do?’ and ‘what would an average university student do?’
- Deceived into thinking they had to recommend a sensory deprivation study to
the school ethics board using words such as ‘exciting’ and ‘incredible’
- Left in room for 7 mins to either write positive statement or an ethics reports
- Brought into another room to do personality tests and then fully debriefed
- For survey ~ 3.6% obey, 31.9% disobey, 64.5% whistleblow (what they’d do)
- 18.8% obey, 43.9% disobey, 37.3% whistleblow (average student)
- In actual study ~ 76.5% obeyed, 14.1% obeyed, 9.4% whistleblew w/6% anon
- Slight relationship between strong faith and whistleblowing
- No relationship between other factors like gender, religious affiliation,
personality test results
- Many entered agentic state so blindly followed the experimenter
- Laboratory study, ethics fairly questionable, independent measures,
standardised, good practical applications
Milgram vs. Bocchiaro
Similarity: - Practical Applications
Difference: - Ethics
Piliavin:
, Aims: To conduct a field experiment to investigate the effect of several different
variables she on who responded to help
- 4550 participants (55% white 45% black) in 103 trials on a New York Subway for
7.5 continuous mins
- 4 groups of 4 experimenters – 2 males acting, 2 women recording, in 1 group, 1
black man
- 1 male acted as the ‘victim’ who was either drunk w/ alcohol in brown bag and
smelled of alcohol, or ill w/ a cane
- After 70 secs, he collapsed in the centre of the carriage, waiting for help
- Other man either offered no help, stood in critical area and helped after 70 secs,
or 150 secs, or from adjacent area after 70 secs, or 150 secs
- In all but 3 of the cane trials, victim received help before the model intervened
- Men more likely to help than women
- Spontaneous help before 70 secs was more common in cane than drunk
- No difference in help towards black or white victims
- Drunk black victim more likely to receive help from own ethnicity
- Victims received help in 81/103 trials, and in 60%, help was from more than one
person
- The longer the victim went w/out help, the more likely people were to move
away or verbally justify not intervening
- No consent from any of the participants, during same time (11am – 3pm) so Ps
could have done task before, no debrief, more cane trials than drunk trials,
more white victims than black victims, didn’t know participating so wouldn’t
change their normal behaviour, ethnocentric
Levine:
Aims: To determine if a city’s tendency to offer non-emergency help to strangers is
stable frogs across situations over a wide range of cultures.
She. To research whether substantial variation exists across the cultures studied.
She. To identify country-level variables that might relate to differences in helping.
- 23 cities measured based on population, their PPP, a rating from 0-10 on
whether they were individualist or collectivist, and their pace of life
- Pace of life was measured by average time it took for 35 men and women to
walk 60ft between two pointa
- Task 1) 214 men, 210 women passed in street and the experimenter dropped a
pen when 15ft away
- Task 2) 253 men, 240 women passed in street, experimenter wore a leg brace
and dropped magazines
- Task 3) 281 trials w/ experimenter trained to act blind and went to crossing just
before light went green, waiting for assistance for 60 secs/if light turned red
- Experimenters were male, college age, dressed neatly, didn’t communicate w/
Ps, and trained to ensure similar experience for all Ps
- Most helpful were Rio de Janeiro (93.9%) and San Jose, least helpful were Kuala
Lumpar (40.33%) and New York City
- Quicker pace of life, individualist countries, non-simpatia = less likely to help
- New York anomaly as Blind had 75% help, but for leg brace only 28%
- No consent from Ps, highly controlled via training and similar Es, not
ethnocentric, good practical applications
Piliavin vs. Levine
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper aislingwest. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor $12.64. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
