Summary
Philosophy of Science & Methodology: Readings and Lectures Summary - PART 1!
- Course
- Institution
- Book
Readings and Lectures Summary 2nd Semester (2018/19)
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
Exploring Humans summary chapters 10-12
-
Exploring Humans summary chapters 7-9
-
Samenvatting Exploring Humans - Philosophy of the social sciences (3801PSQPVY)
Seller
Follow
alicetiker
Reviews received
Content preview
Philosophy of Science and Methodology - PARTIAL EXAM 1 - April 25, 2019Lecture 1 // 1-4-19
Two philosophical positions about science
Scientism
Science is vastly superior to all other attempts at securing knowledge: its laws provide certainty.
- Age of certainty
- Other key words: facts, science is the truth, rationality
- Also associated with modernism (modern thinking): rational-secular, think for yourself, use
reason only, modernity
- Knowledge and truth about nature and humans are only found by and in science
- ‘Slogan’: scientific method is the only method to obtain facts/truth; science is about everything
- Our mind is the perfect mirror of reality/nature
- Science is objective
Skepticism
Science does not give certainty, it is equal to other forms of knowledge, science is a faith.
- Critical thinking about science, its methods/boundaries, pluralistic conception of rationality and
knowledge
- Other key words: more than one truth, truth is experience, uncertainty, knowledge = oppressive
power, science is an ideology
- Also associated with post modernism (culture (thinking) after modernism): also secular but
different; individual and emotional expression are key construction
- Relativism (no absolute truths, differences in moral judgements amongst people and cultures)/
Nihilism (denial or lack of belief in meaningful aspects of life; life is without objective meaning/
purpose/intrinsic value)
- Knowledge and truth are social constructions that need deconstruction
- ‘Slogan’: anything goes; carnival of approaches should be allowed
- Our mind is a crooked mirror, we know nothing and we never will
- Science is developed by humans and is an interpretation of nature and society
- Science is subjective and in the interest of the powerful
Scientism vs Skepticism
- Philosophical skepticism is critical thinking about science within the boundaries of philosophy
- A relativistic (= everything is relative), radical interpretation of philosophical skepticism has
become like a raging fire in society
- Background of issue/social debate around: alternative facts, fact-free politics, fake news, post-
truth era, political correctness, freedom of speech, identity politics and conformism
- In communication science terms: misinformation or disinformation
,Watt & van den Berg (2002) - The Nature and Utility of Scientific Theory
Two basic explanation styles
Naive inquiry
Non-formalized, non-systematic, non-controlled form of collecting and summarizing information
into naive theories.
- Naive science: when people with lack of awareness of the rules of science engage in inquisition
about how things work, finding explanations and predicting outcomes
- Theory (as defined for the purposes of this text): simplified explanation of reality
- Human, as naive scientists, try to explain and predict ordinary events in their world for utilitarian
purposes and because we are uncomfortable with unexplained phenomena
- More evidence improves the probability that a theory is true, each additional confirming
observation makes it more probable that the hypothesized relationship between variables is not
a coincidence
- Also known as: common sense (what we do in daily life), premodern thinking (religion, belief),
non-sophisticated ways of knowing reality (fixing belief)
- Methods of knowing: tenacity (common knowledge, naive way of reasoning), authority (high
regarded person speaks truth, works in religion too, naive too), reasonable man (reason and
logical consistency is key), science (established set of mutually agreed upon rules)
- Associated with biases, convictions, skepticism, myths, stereotypes
- Often people say ‘I have a theory’ when a hypothesis is meant (‘slogan’ of naive inquiry)
Scientific inquiry
Highly formalized, systematic, and controlled inquiry; observations and reasoning are error prone
Science shifts the locus of truth from single individuals to groups, by establishing a set of mutually
agreed upon rules for establishing truth.
- Also known as: the scientific method, modern thinking, analytical-empirical approach
- Associated with critical shift in perspective compared to naive inquiry, internal beliefs should be
supported by external evidence, methodological modeling
- ‘Slogan’: truth is an objective reality out there and our ideas do not alter that reality; we develop
theories that are true
- Key is theory! A theory is a set of constructs, definitions, and propositions that present a
systematic view of phenomena by specifying relations among variables, with the purpose of
explaining and predicting phenomena.
- Scientific inquiry: laboratories and experiments are THE symbols of scientific inquiry in natural
and social sciences
- Basic requirements of the scientific method: use and selection of concepts, linking concepts by
propositions, testing theories with observable evidence, defining concepts, publication of
definitions and procedures, control of alternative explanations, unbiased selection of evidence,
reconciliation of theory and observation, awareness of the limitations of the scientific method
, Naive inquiry vs Scientific inquiry/method
- Main point of difference: the awareness that our observations and reasoning are error-prone
and that we must employ strategies that help us guard against committing error
- Five points in which the two methods differ (Kerlinger, 1986)
- (1) The development of theories
- Theory: set of two or more concepts interrelated by one or mire hypothetical or theoretical
explanations (also simplified explanation of reality)
- Scientists: selection and elimination of possible concepts by systematically reviewing prior
research, potentially adding new concepts based in logic, insight, and observation
- Naive scientists: will not go through selection process but will choose concepts that seem
appealing and he would like to be the cause, will use personal observation like a scientist
- Difference: naive scientist will consider his personal observations to be sufficient to
construct a story, while a true scientist will consider his personal observations as a
preliminary step in the process of scientific observation
- (2) The testing of theories
- Difference between them based on demand for evidence supporting the theory
- Scientists: will seek objective evidence (evidence that can be collected by anyone) then
make conclusions; are aware of human tendency towards selective use of evidence, will
be conscious about bias
- Naive scientists: will deem a theory true because it’s ‘common sense’; if more evidence
resurfaces: consistent information will reinforce the conclusions, conflicting information will
be ignored
- (3) Control of alternative explanations
- Closely related to development of theories
- Scientists: will design study that will conclude that one particular variable causes a
particular effect (or not) after finding number of possible competing causes for a
phenomena
- Naive scientists: cannot control systematically mostly because they probably didn’t
identify all relevant concepts
- (4) The nature of relationships
- Three types of relationships between variables: null, covariance, causal
- Scientists: will apply scientific methodology to distinguish between null and non-null
relationships
- Naive scientists: will likely capitalize on the joint occurrence of two phenomena and
assume them to be linked together, particularly if this fits their preconceptions or beliefs
- (5) Testing theories with observable evidence
- Scientists: search for relevant concepts needs to be limited to concepts that are
observable by anyone
- Naive scientists: don’t concern themselves with such rule of evidence, will assume that
because something is obvious/common sense to them it will apply to anyone
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller alicetiker. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.35. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now