100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary 2.3 Problem 3 $4.88   Add to cart

Summary

Summary 2.3 Problem 3

 31 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Summary for problem 3 for Block 2.3

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • Unknown
  • October 26, 2020
  • 5
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Problem 6 – Hergenhahn + Popper K. Science as Falsification + Pajares F. The Structure of
Scientific Revolutions + Pigliucci M. Popper vs Kuhn

Karl Popper
- Theories of Marx, Freud and Adler were always verified, whatever happened always
confirmed it, Popper said this strength is actually the theories’ weakness
- He changed the conception of science by showing science to be highly subjective
- He disagreed that scientific activity starts with empirical observation
- For Popper, scientific activity starts with a problem and that determines what
observations scientists will make
- The next step: proposing solutions to the problem and finding fault with the
proposed solutions

Popper’s conclusions:
1. It’s easy to obtain confirmation or verification for nearly every theory – if we look for
confirmations
2. Confirmations should count only if they are a result of risky predictions - predictions
that run a real risk of being incorrect
3. Every “good” scientific theory is a prohibition: it forbids certain things to happen and
the more it forbids the better it is
4. A theory which is not refutable is non-scientific
5. Every test of a theory is an attempt to falsify/refute it. Testability is refutability, but
there are degrees: some theories are more testable, some take greater risks
6. Confirming evidence should not count except when it is the result of testing of a
theory (it can be presented as a serious but unsuccessful attempt to falsify the
theory)
7. Some testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers
- In conclusion: the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, refutability, testability
- He created the problem of demarcation: distinguishing between scientific claims and
all other claims

Principle of falsifiability (Hergenhahn)
- The demarcation criterion that distinguished a scientific and nonscientific theory is
the principle of falsifiability
- A major problem of psychological theories is that they engage in postdiction
(explaining the phenomena after it had already occurred
- “all swans are white” can’t be verified except observing all current and future swans
(clearly this is impossible), however observing only one nonwhite swan falsifies the
proposition
- All scientific theories will eventually be found false and be replaced with more
adequate theories

, Thomas Kuhn

Paradigms and normal science
- Paradigm: A viewpoint that is commonly shared with most members of a science
- The paradigm becomes a way of looking and analyzing the subject matter of that
science
- Normal science: The activities of those who accept the paradigm
- These activities become a matter of exploring the implications of that paradigm
- Kuhn compared normal science to puzzle solving:
o like puzzles the problems of normal science have a solution
o there are rules that limit both the nature of acceptable solutions and the
steps by which they are to be obtained
- Normal science and puzzle solving don’t involve creativity
- Pro: a paradigm guarantee’s that certain phenomena are studied in detail and depth
- Con: it blinds scientists to other phenomena and better explanations for what they
are studying

How sciences change
- There must be persistent observations that the currently accepted paradigm can’t
explain: these are called anomalies
- Anomaly: the recognition that nature has violated the paradigm

How does paradigm change come?
- Through discovery: discovery begins with the awareness of the anomaly; the change
is complete when the paradigm is adjusted so the anomaly is now expected
- Invention of a theory: generated by the persistent failure of puzzles to be solved as
they should
o These failures are observed discrepancies between theory and fact
- The recognition of anomalies results in crises that are necessary for the emergence of
novel theories and for paradigm change
- All crises close in one of 3 ways:
o Normal science handles the crisis-provoking problem and returns to normal
o The problem resists because of the failure to possess the necessary tools to
solve it, they leave it for future generations to deal with it
o A new candidate for paradigm emerges:

- A small group of scientists will propose an alternative viewpoint, one that will
account for the anomaly
- There is typically resistance to new paradigm and it’s a slow progress
- Eventually, new paradigm wins and displaces the old one
- A scientific revolution: a non-cumulative developmental episode in which an older
paradigm is replaced by an incompatible new one
- Kuhn portrayed science as a method of inquiry that combines the objective scientific
method and the emotional makeup of scientist

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ebru1365. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.88. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64438 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.88
  • (0)
  Add to cart