100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Brief, chronologically organized summary of lectures $3.21   Add to cart

Class notes

Brief, chronologically organized summary of lectures

 28 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Use this summary as a guide to understanding the lectures. It contains the terms you are taught in the course and links them to philosophers, the era, and other mentioned concepts. In order to fully understand the meanings behind the topics, I would advise you to follow the lectures. Concepts from ...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • October 28, 2020
  • 4
  • 2020/2021
  • Class notes
  • Unknown
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Philosophy is an attempt to ask&answer very basic questions about the universe and our place within.
The Scientific revolution Copernicus finding out the 🌍orbits the ☀, Newton saying objects have
attraction, Galileo inventing telescope and by observing phases of Venus. „Yet it moves! “Even before
that, the Aristoteles (Scholastic View) claimed the world is made out of 💦, air, earth and 🔥and that
the motion is violent and natural. Plato introduces the necessary (if a doesn’t have the property s, it is
not x = essential) and sufficient (if a does have property s, it is x = enough) defined knowledge as a
„true justified belief “, which is something De Montaigne (SCEPTICISM) didn’t fancy because: even
though we have beliefs, and some of them might be accidentally true, we are not certain, therefore we
cannot justify them. Sceptics said it’s because our senses & reasoning are unreliable, so we cannot
trust them. Therefore, necessary condition of “justification” of knowledge is not met. There are two
positions concerning the source of knowledge: 1. RATIONALISM by Descartes (Cogito argument:
“I think; therefore, I am”) claimed the following: if you know the premises are true, you are absolutely
certain that the conclusion is true (a deductive argument). Clear distinct ideas  Deduction 
Knowledge. This bird is black, this bird is black: some birds are black. This is how maths works. 2.
EMPIRICISM by Bacon🥓 (Tabula Rasa: we are not born with any innate knowledge. “There is
nothing in our mind that was not first in our senses”). If you are certain that the premises are true, it
becomes more likely that the conclusion is true (induction). Observation  Induction  Knowledge.
Socrates is mortal. Roy Dongers is mortal. Trump is mortal. All humans are mortal. Criticism of
empiricism includes I. Vulnerability to Sceptics since they believed observations are unreliable II.
Problem of Induction: we believe in past to predict future which is circular as it presupposes that
induction is reliable.

During Annus Mirabilis (1905), Einstein proved 💡consists of particles, that ⚛ exist, relativity theory
and E=mc2. There is more than just Newton’s gravity. Let’s Vienna Circle lead by Moritz Chlick a.
examine the logical structure of scientific theories which will lead us to the exact nature of science and
come up with b. verifiability and confirmability as a demarcation criterion (to know what is/n’t
pseudoscience). It was important to search for the demarcation because of Nazis and the Einstein-
Bergson debate who had a philosophical theory of time and did not want Einstein get the Nobel prize
for the Theory of Relativity. However, confirmation is too weak and verification is too strong.
According to The Raven’s Paradox, confirmation is too weak, because observation of a black raven
confirms the theory but so does observation of a white 👟. This means that confirmation is not a
sufficient condition for increasing the probability of a hypothesis to be true. The Goodman’s New
Riddle of Induction shows there is no logical theory of confirmation since some arguments are
better arguments than others just based on their contents (grue). Therefore, Popper came up with
another demarcation criterion – falsification to get rid of induction and confirmation
(FALSIFICAIONSM). The cycle of falsification is the following: I. Conjecture: creating a theory
with novel predictions II. Refutation: test the hypothesis and try to refute it. If a theory is not
falsified, it is only corroborated. Following this logic, why are conspiracies a pseudoscience?
Because they built in protection mechanisms and denounce counterevidence as part of the conspiracy.
Advantages of falsification? I. No confirmation bias 2. Thinking outside of the 📦3. Deduction.
Criticism of falsification includes: I. Too radical: negative knowledge, corroborated. II. Duhem-
Quine thesis: I know I falsified something but I am not sure what exactly (a theory is a 🕸). Orbit of
Uranus didn’t follow Newton’s theory, maybe another planet would be in the way? Yes, indeed:
Neptune. Also, Mercury’s orbit was few secs off and when Einstein proved Newton wrong, it
suddenly could be explained. III. Theory Ladenness of Observation: everything we observe is
interpreted through prior knowledge = theories, therefore observation is “theory-laden” = “-driven”

RELATIVISM(Kuhn&Feyerabend): truth & justification is relative to paradigm. Kuhn said that
instead of searching for demarcation criteria, let’s examine the history of 🧪. “🧪is just an opinion”. Kuhn
came up with Episodic Model of Science in which periods of normal 🧪are occasionally interrupted by
periods of revolutionary 🧪. Normal 🧪is paradigm driven and follows certain methodological rules, it is
not open to testing. Next step: anomaly being a 🧩that has resisted solution, later: critical mass of
anomalies, later crisis: losing faith in the paradigm and looking for alternatives. Revolutionary 🧪:
many rival paradigms emerge and one replaces the old one. Normal 🧪 Anomalies  Crisis 
Revolution. We have a Modest👉👈Kuhn: with each new paradigm, the problem-solving power of

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller teavulas. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.21  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart