100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Defamation PQ Notes (First Class) $3.92   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Defamation PQ Notes (First Class)

 69 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Comprehensive first class Tort Law PQ notes from University College London (2010/2020). Notes include concise case summaries, key reasonings to reconcile conflicting case law and detailed answer outlines to problem questions

Last document update: 3 year ago

Preview 2 out of 12  pages

  • October 29, 2020
  • June 10, 2021
  • 12
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Defamation


a. Definition
 Tort of strict liability, aims to protect claimant’s reputation
 Requirements
o Statement must be defamatory
o Statement must refer to claimant
o Statement must be published

 Defences to defamation
o Distributors
o Truth
o Honest Opinion
o Qualified Privilege
o Absolute Privilege

b. Libel vs Slander
 Libel: Permanent publications or those broadcast on stage/screen or electronic means.
No requirement to prove that claimant has suffered a loss
 Slander: Transient publications which only give rise to liability if loss is proven

 s.166 Broadcasting Act 1990: Defamatory words/pictures/visual images/gestures on the
radio are to be treated as libel
 s.4(1) Theatres Act 1968: Publication of defamatory words during performance of a play
are treated as libel
o Exceptions in s.7(1) & (2)




bi. Slander – Requirement of Special Damage
 2 exceptions to this
o Imputation of Unfitness in Business/Incompetence (s.2 Defamation Act 1952)
o Imputation of criminal conduct

, Defamation


Thorley v Lord Kerry
o Distinguished spoken words as slander, written words as libel
o Court saw not principled justification but felt compelled to accept it due to precedent
o Criticism: May not accurately reflect damage caused  words spoken infront of a large
group of people vs a written article only read by a few

Gray v Jones
o Held that slander was actionable where the defendant had said to the claimant ‘you
are a convicted person’

c. Requirement 1: Statement must be Defamatory
 Definition: Statement which tends to lower a person’s standing amongst right-thinking
people  which has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to that person’s reputation.

Monson v Tussauds
o Held that statues/wax works/caricature/ signs/pictures constitutes defamatory
statement
Lachaux
o Does not require every single person who sees statement to understand defamatory
meaning, just a tendency for someone who sees it to understand
o Tendency reflects inherently injurious nature of statement

Berkoff v Burchill
o Reviewer called Berkoff ‘notoriously hideous’  B sued for defamation
o Held that statement was defamatory  because he was an actor/playwright and public
performance was essential to his livelihood  emphasised the importance of his
profession
o Dissent: Millett LJ: People must be allowed to poke fun at one another without fear of
litigation  it is one thing to ridicule a man, but another to expose him to ridicule

Youssoupoff v Metro
o Allegations that C is misfortunate (madness, disease, rape) can constitute defamation 
because others would socially exclude C through pity/moral judgment

ci. Right Thinking People
 Definition of ‘right thinking’ people from Sim v Stretch

Byrne v Dean
o C was a member of a golf club with Illegal gambling machines  C alerted police
o Someone posted a poem accusing C of being the snitch  caused him to feel ostracized

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller firstclasslawnotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.92. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.92  3x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart