100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Evidence-based interventions - lecture notes $3.75
Add to cart

Class notes

Evidence-based interventions - lecture notes

1 review
 63 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This file contains clear notes of all the lectures for the course Evidence-based interventions of the Master Clinical Psychology. This is a nice addition to the summaries.

Preview 3 out of 27  pages

  • October 30, 2020
  • 27
  • 2020/2021
  • Class notes
  • Unknown
  • All classes

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: ValentijnLietmeijer • 3 year ago

reply-writer-avatar

By: Astridtos • 3 year ago

Translated by Google

Thanks!

avatar-seller
Lectures
Lecture 1
Why bother to learn how to learn how to search the literature for interventions with evidence?
 desire for truth
 increase ability to deliver best treatment (within one’s expertise)
 referral decisions
 what to invest re: career development
 what to avoid
o critical incidence stress debriefing (increase PTSD sx’s)
o grief counselling for normal bereavement (increase depression)

Francis Bacon was an important thinker in het Scientific Revolution.
 “If we are to achieve results never before accomplished, we must employ methods never
before attempted”.

Idea of science as “the reliable product of disinterested and dispassionate inquiry” that “went hand
in hand with the idea that such knowledge could be a tool for improving the human lot” (Gottleib,
1996).

Evidence based medicine: integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external




clinical evidence from systematic research.

Mesmer: with magnets, magnetic field of the body, would open up the fields, and the person would
get better.

The 1784 Commission on Mesmerism:
 a number of experiments, such as mesmerizing groups of differing social class
 conclusion part 1: it works for some people

Learning objectives for this lecture:
 learning how to search for scientific evidence
 learning how to formulate a clinical question
 learning how to appraise the quality of scientific evidence and methods for improving quality
 knowing about possible biases in published evidence

,Searching for scientific evidence:
 scientific journals:
o quality (reputation: impact factor)
o research perspective
 fundamental
 applied
 specific EBMH journals and websites
o Evidence Based Mental Health
 scientific data bases
o university library
o cochrane library (systematic reviews and meta-analyses)

Search within databases: PICO framework
 systematic search protocol
 to formulate a well-focused clinical question
 to retrieve a higher % of relevant citations (in Pubmed, Medline, PsychInfo)

PICO(TT) framework (developed for therapy questions)
 Patient/Population – who or what?
 Intervention – could include diagnostic test, treatment, prognostic factor
 Comparison – what is the main alternative? (If appropriate)
 Outcome – what are you trying to accomplish, measure, improve, effect?
 Type of question – therapy, diagnosis, etc.
 Type of study – the design that is best for the question

 review the literature and summarise

For example, is melatonin (I) helpful for children with ADHD and insomnia (P) to help concentration
at school (O), relative to a placebo (C)?

The default is that we initially believe everything that we see or hear. We need to have motivation
and opportunity to disprove the evidence.

Operationalisation
 effect size: moderate = a few patients with large changes? many patients with smaller
changes?
 percent improved: of completers or all who entered?

Types of control:
 no treatment
 wait-list
 treatment as usual (TAU) ( = very often substandard care)

,  active control

No treatment, wait-list, TAU:
 control for passage of time
 do NOT control for common factors (therapeutic alliance)
 do NOT control for expectation/ placebo

EBM is the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values.

What constitutes “best”, or “good enough” in regards to control group?  Mesmerism worked
(likely would have significant results even when using no-treatment control). Although mesmerism
works for some people, it is due to suggestion.

RCT methods
 unlike pharmacological RCTs, double-blinding is difficult
o depressed patient enrolled in a study is likely to know whether he is receiving the
real treatment
 active control: expectancy very (!) rarely assessed
o intervention provider is likely to know whether he is providing the real treatment

“Failure to control for the confounding effect of differential expectations is not a minor omission – it
is a fundamental design flaw that potentially undermines any causal inference”

Quality of control group influences outcome
 little research has compared expectancies between intervention and control
 Baskin et al. (2003) compared control that was or was not structurally matched to
intervention
o e.g. # sessions, length
of sessions, format
(group v. individual),
therapist training
 effect size was reduced by 68%
overall when conditions were
structurally equivalent (!!!)

In this graph, the more quality a study
had, the lower the effect size was.




Confirmation bias
 tendency to favour information that confirms our theory (beliefs, hypotheses)
 “the human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the
received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree
with it” ~ Francis Bacon

EST criteria for well-established: at least two good between-group design experiments must
demonstrate efficacy  equivalence to already established treatment with adequate sample sizes

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Astridtos. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.75. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.75  1x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added