Adair: Buffering Against the Detrimental Effects of Demographic Faultlines: The
Curious Case of Intragroup Conflict in Small Work Groups
Intro:
Faultlines = ‘hypothetical dividing lines that may split a group into subgroups based on one
or more attributes’
- Previous research: subgroup formation can hinder group performance through
increased intragroup competition & decreased communication, info sharing and
motivation to contribute
But some mechanisms can be used to lessen negative impact on group processes &
performance, e.g. team identification, goal structure, shared objectives and cultural
alignment
Categorisation-elaboration model (CEM):
- Combines social identity w/information-processing theories, predicts that
categorisation pressures & negative effects of faultlines can be avoided when groups
exchange & discuss info and communicate across subgroups
- Conflict will allow groups w/demographic-based faultlines to engage in cross-
subgroup info elaboration, decreasing negative effects of subgrouping
Constructive controversy
- Conflict bridges interests through open discussion & critical examination of ideas,
may decrease negative effects of demographic faultlines on group performance
Theory Development
Demographic Faultlines & Group Performance
- Faultline theory = formation of subgroups based on alignment of demographic/other
shared characteristics. Faultlines emerge through processes of self-categorisation,
social identification and similarity-attraction. Can lead to ingroup-outgroup
competition, restricted communication, etc.
Moderators that limit negative effects of faultlines:
- Bridging faultlines requires inducing a subordinate team identity and/or effective
cross-subgroup interaction – negative faultline-performance relationship weakened
when groups have a strong team identity
- Team members’ openness to experience
- Team leader’s diversity beliefs
- Social category salience
Faultines & Group Conflict
- Conflict = perceived differences/incompatibilities among group members
- 3 types of conflict:
1. Task conflict = disagreements over work-related issues
2. Relationship conflict = disagreements about interpersonal issues
3. Process conflict = disagreements about how work gets done
- Role of conflict in faultline theory
, Present study expectations (hypothesis)
- Relationship, task & process conflict will buffer negative association between group’s
faultlines & group performance - the negative association weaker when conflict is
higher
Study 1
Method
- Measured intragroup conflict, group faultlines & group performance
Results
- Relationship between faultline strength & group performance was negative when
relationship conflict was low, but not significant when conflict was high – so conflict
is good, but not too much?
Discussion
- All 3 types of conflict buffer negative effect of faultlines on group performance
Study 2
Method
- Groups of 4, make a list of useful items needed to survive in desert in a pair, then
discuss with the other pair to make a list. Then completed questionnaire
- Ethnic faultline groups (2 Caucasians & 2 East-Asians) vs. no-faultline groups (all
Caucasian)
- Conflict (participants on one side read that keeping hydrated was most important,
participants on other side read that protection from heat was most important) vs. no-
conflict condition
Results
- Groups in conflict condition rated perceived relationship & task conflict as higher
than those in no-conflict condition, but no difference in perceptions of process
conflict between groups in conflict condition & no-conflict condition – so conflict
manipulation only induced relationship & task conflict, not process conflict
- Interaction not significant in no-faultline condition – could be bc condition included
East Asian & Caucasian ethnically homogeneous groups
- Buffering effect of group conflict on faultline-group performance relationship, but
only when comparing faultline w/no-faultline East Asian teams. So, group conflict
only detrimental to group performance in North American teams, but not East Asian
teams
General Discussion
- Because conflict involves noticing differences & disagreements, may weaken
negative effect of demographic faultlines on group performance
- Demographic faultlines had less negative effect on group performance for teams that
had greater team conflict & under conditions of conflict, ethnic faultline groups
performed better than Caucasian no-faultline groups
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller akiestudholme. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.98. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.