Summary
Summary Passer book statistics
- Course
- Institution
- Book
A summary of chapters from the Passer book Research Methods used during Psych course 2.2 Statistics. Only the relevant chapters are included.
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
Blok 1.3 Samenvatting Passer
-
Research Methods van Michael W. Passer Hoofdstuk 5
-
Research Methods van Michael W. Passer Hoofdstuk 4
Seller
Follow
ludoarvigo
Content preview
Passer notesCHAPTER 1
Ways of knowing
- Tenacity = knowing sth. b/c we have believed it for a long time
- Authority = knowing things b/c others tell us that that is how it is
- Reason = uses logic & rational arguments to attain knowledge
- Empiricism = attaining knowledge through experience & observation
- Systematic empiricism = systematic gathering & evaluation of empirical evidence
Goals of science
- Description, explanation, prediction and control
o Scientists describe phenomena and try to explain why they occur w/ hypotheses & theories
o Hypotheses (can be derived from a theory) is converted into an if-then prediction & then tested
w/ empirical data
o When gathering data, scientists try to control all other influencing factors to rule out their
effect
o If two variables are associated, knowledge about one can lead to predictions about the other
o Control can also be applied to influence events/behaviour in ways that benefit people
- Science assumes that occurrences have underlying causes that are discoverable
- Science is empirical, systematic & focusses on testable questions
- Accuracy & objectivity: concepts must be clearly defined and operationalised when conducting
research
- Science is tentative → if new knowledge is uncovered previous knowledge is subject to review ➔
science is self-correcting
- Science has limitations: it cannot answer nonempirical questions
Types of research
- Basic research is conducted to examine the fundamental nature of phenomena
- Applied research is conducted to solve/evaluate a specific, real world problem
- Basic and applied research benefit each other
- Scepticism: questioning the validity of claims before accepting them
- Scepticism & critical thinking can help prevent being misled by false info & claims
CHAPTER 3
Conducting ethical research
Ethics – a system of moral principles and standards
Affects:
1)how scientists conducted research and 2) the public’s and scientific community’s faith in the value of the
scientific research
- Type of research and procedures
- Recruitments of participants
- Data storage, analysis and reporting
- Validity of conclusions
- Protection of participants
, Passer notes
- Public’s willingness to participate
- Public’s acceptance of research
- Trust in integrity
Nuremberg code – set of medical principles necessary un medical research
→ created after many experiments conducted by Nazi in concentration camp inmates
Principles:
- Consent must be voluntary and can withdraw at any time
- People should be informed about experiment
- Risks should be avoided
- Results should yield benefits to society that outweigh risks
- Qualified scientists should conduct the research
Belmont report – ethics code for human research
→ created after Syphilis study
Principles:
- Respect for persons - obtaining consent
- Beneficence – assessing advantages and risks
- Justice – selecting participants in a just way (do not take advantage of any group and allow treatment
to all)
Common rule – federal policies that specifies ethics regulations for human subjects research
Criteria:
- Intervention
- Interaction
- Private information
- Individual identification
APA code
Principles:
- Beneficence and nonmaleficence
- Fidelity and responsibility
- Integrity
- Justice
- Respect for people’s rights and dignity
Ambiguity – terms are broad and no specific guidelines on how to act
- Difficulty for researcher in deciding how a principle applies to a case
- Disagreement between researcher an ethics committee (maybe have different opinion on what is
moral or not)
- Different committees reach different conclusions
- Adhering to on standard might interfere with another one
- Different parties or participants involved might have competing interests – if moral with one cannot be
with the other..
Institutional review board (IRB) – independent institutional committee that evaluates whether proposed
research with human participants complies with federal ethics regulations
- Should have at least 5 members of which
1. Not affiliated with the institution
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ludoarvigo. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.43. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
64438 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now