100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary A clinical perspective on today's issues - learning objectives interim 1 $3.22
Add to cart

Summary

Summary A clinical perspective on today's issues - learning objectives interim 1

 0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This is a short overview of the learning objectives and what information is most important. It would be good to buy my complete summary in addition to this document. Good luck!

Preview 1 out of 7  pages

  • November 15, 2020
  • 7
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
1. Hyde, position: Gender similarities hypothesis: men and women are very similar on most (not
all) psychological variables. Meta-analysis: 78% of gender differences are small or close to 0.
→ there are many costs to thinking in differences, stereotypes, etc.
2. Eagly: she wrote the review of nature vs. nurture debate, position somewhat unclear. Probably
in essence, that there should be more integrated models integrating both nature and nurture
explanations and how these interact.
3. Reilly, position: Gender similarities hypothesis ignores lack of teachers, role models, and
other issues for certain genders. Small gender differences can still be very important. Boys for
example less good at learning how to read, write, spell. Intention gender similarities
hypothesis was to promote equality, but it has however obscured some of the research done on
gender differences. Best to see gender as a continuous variable: more about degree of
masculinity and femininity. Both the two are not highly correlated, someone can score high on
both (androgynous).
4. Kuyper, position: her paper was needed, as is stated in it as well. She would however change
2 things: the sample size (larger and not only online) and the way they defined gender
ambivalent identities (she would consider the strength of gender identity as well).


Hyde & Delamater paper:
→ Intersectionality: approach that simultaneously considers the consequences of
multiple group memberships, e.g. the intersection of gender and ethnicity.
→ gender-socialization (the ways in which society conveys to the individual its norms or
expectations for their -gender-typical- behavior).
→ differences exist, but are quite specific. Think of aggressiveness (males>females), risk-
taking/impulsivity (m>f), communication style (f>m, for self-disclosure), sexuality (m>f,
masturbation, casual sex attitudes, pornography use, arousal to erotica, orgasm gap, sex
drive).
→ Differences can be explained by different factors: ‘bogus conditions’ for expectation
effects, biological factors (anatomy, hormones -which is debatable), cultural factors
(double standard, gender roles, marital/family roles, body image), others (pregnancy,
ineffective techniques female stimulation, masturbation incidence differences, erotic
dependency of females on males).
-- Gender dysphoria: distress is central, prejudice is common (can be reduces by perspective-taking of
the group), social transition (living out the gender identity, being supported) → better outcomes, only
20% of children → GD as adult (explained by self-report overestimation, or underestimation due to
prevalence based on GD seeking treatment).

Petersen & Hyde paper:
→ Theoretical frameworks gender differences in sexuality:
1) Evolutionary psychology (incl. sexual strategies theory), result of evolution, different
strategies for genetic success;
2) Cognitive social learning theory, learning through observation, analyzing, modelling,
also through media;
3) Social structural theory, result of differences in division of labor/power & status;
4) Gender similarities hypothesis.

Vanwesenbeek paper:
→ Problems with sex-research:
- Gender vs. sex (problematic, definitions are used as if it’s the same, but are not);
- Gender and sexuality (gender is mostly seen as preceding and determining of sexuality; the
relationship between gender and heterosexuality is tight and reciprocal; patterned fluidity);

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rosaliemn. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.22. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

65507 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$3.22
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added