100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PVL1501 - law of persons Case summaries $2.73
Add to cart

Case

PVL1501 - law of persons Case summaries

 45 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

PVL1501 - law of persons Case summaries

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • November 26, 2020
  • 6
  • 2020/2021
  • Case
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
1




1. EX PARTE BOEDEL STEENKAMP

Facts: Testator left estate to his daughter and her children. At the time that daughter was
pregnant when the testator died.

Issue: Should the nasciturus inherit?

Ratio Decidendi/Held: Yes, A child already conceived will be regarded as already born
and will therefore inherit if it is subsequently born alive
2. PINCHIN V SANTAM INSURANCE CO LTD

Facts: A women who was six months pregnant was involved in a motor car accident due to
the negligent driving of another person, causing her child to be born with cerebral palsy

Issue: Does a person have an action in respect of injury inflicted upon him while he was
still a foetus in his mother’s womb?

Held: The court held that the nasciturus fiction has to apply so that he can claim for
damages.
3. ROAD ACCIDENT FUND V M OBO M

Facts: A collision took place between a motor vehicle and M’s wife (pedestrian.) As a result
of the collision, M’s wife who was pregnant with Z, who was born with severe mental
retardation. M claimed R.1.3 million from RAF.

Issue: Is it necessary to invoke nasciturus fiction?


Held: No, A foetus can claim for pre-natal, but only in regard to delict. The nasciturus
fiction is no longer a necessary requirement for maintenance.
4. CHRISTIAN LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA V THE MINISTER OF HEALTH 1998

Facts: Christian Lawyer’s Association sought to declare the Choice of Termination of
Pregnancy Act 72 of 1996 unconstitutional on the basis that a foetus has a right to life as
contained in the bill of rights.

Issue: Is the Act constitutional?

Held: Yes, the Act was constitutional and women have the right to terminate pregnancies
in accordance to act.

, 2


5. CHRISTIAN LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION V NATIONAL MINISTER OF HEALTH 2004

Facts: A minor was pregnant and wanted to terminate her pregnancy.

Issue: Whether she could have an abortion without consent from her family

Held: The court held that she could terminate her pregnancy according to the
Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996, as long as she was able to
give her informed consent, which she did.
6. RE BEAGLEHOLE

Facts: A beneficiary to a will, had not been located in 15 years

Issue: Should an application for a presumption of death succeed?

Held: No, the court held that an application fro a presumption of death should be left to the
discretion of the judge (Roman-Dutch), hence the period of absence of a person is not
required to order a presumption of death.
7. EX PARTE PIETERS

Facts: The applicant’s father disappeared, and was unable to obtain the money left to him
by his wife despite having a rule nisi granted

Issue: Should the application for a presumption of death be successful?

Decision: No, however the court authorised the Master to distribute the money equally
between the applicant and his siblings without the necessity of their providing security.

Ratio Decidendi: The presumption of death is refused, because the evidence surrounding
Mr. Pieters death is not conclusive.
8. J V DIRECTOR – GENERAL

Facts: Two applicants in a same sex life partnership, 2nd applicant gave birth to twins via
artificial insemination

Issue: Is a child born due to artificial insemination legitimate?

Held: Yes, Children born as a consequence of artificial insemination are covered by the
Children Status Act 82 of 1987, therefore the child was legitimate.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Simplelaw. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $2.73. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

50843 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$2.73
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added