Summary
Summary Text and Image in News and Advertising
- Course
- Institution
A summary of all the articles that are used for the master's course Text and Image in News and Advertising
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
lottebartelds
Reviews received
Content preview
Summarized articlesAndersen, L. P. (2003). Conceptualising Television Advertising. In F. Hansen & L. B. Christensen
(Eds.), Branding and Advertising (pp. 284-305). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business
School Press.
Bock, M. A. (2016). Showing versus telling: Comparing online video from newspaper and
television websites. Journalism, 17(4), 493-510.
Kim, K., Lee, S., & Choi, Y. K. (2019). Image proximity in advertising appeals: Spatial distance and
product types. Journal of Business Research 99, 490-497. doi:
10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.031
Kress, G.R., and Van Leeuwen, Theo (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd
ed.). Chapters 2 and 3. London: Taylor & Francis. Available as ebook
at http://ub.vu.nlLinks to an external site..
Kuiken, J., Schuth, A., Spitters, M., & Marx, M. (2017). Effective headlines of newspaper articles in
a digital environment. Digital Journalism, 1-15. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1279978
Lagerwerf, L., Timmerman, C., & Bosschaert, A. (2016). Incongruity in news headings: Readers'
choices and resulting cognitions. Journalism Practice, 10(6), 782-804.
Molek-Kozakowska, K. (2013). Towards a pragma-linguistic framework for the study of
sensationalism in news headlines. Discourse & Communication, 7(2), 173-197.
Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual
Rhetoric in advertising. Marketing theory, 4(1-2), 113-136.
Phillips, B.J. and McQuarrie, E.F. (2014). Visual rhetoric and international advertising. In Cheng,
H. (ed.), The handbook of international advertising research (pp. 238-250). Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons Inc. (available via doi:Â 10.1002/9781118378465.ch12).
Powell, T. E., Boomgaarden, H. G., De Swert, K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). A clearer picture: The
contribution of visuals and text to framing effects. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 997-
1017.
Šorm, E., & Steen, G. J. (2013). Processing visual metaphor: A study in thinking out
loud. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(1), 1-34.
Sternadori, M. M., & Wise, K. (2010). Men and women read news differently: The effects of story
structure on the cognitive processing of text. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories,
Methods, and Applications, 22(1), 14.
Van Enschot, R., & Hoeken, H. (2015). The occurrence and effects of verbal and visual anchoring
, of tropes on the perceived comprehensibility and liking of TV commercials. Journal of
Advertising, 44(1), 25-36.
Van Mulken, M., van Hooft, A., & Nederstigt, U. (2014). Finding the tipping point: Visual
metaphor and conceptual complexity in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 333-
343.
Van Weelden, L., Cozijn, R., Maes, A., & Schilperoord, J. (2010). Perceptual Similarity in Visual
Metaphor Processing. Paper presented at the AAAI Spring Symposium: Cognitive Shape
Processing.
Kress & Van Leeuwen (2006): Narrative Representations: Designing social action
(Chapter 2)
Vector = the contrast between foreground and background
Visual structures = never merely formal they have an important semantic dimension
Participants:
- Interactive = the participants in the act of communication who watch the image
- Represented = the participants who constitute the subject matter of the communication
who are in the image
Represented participants:
- Formal art theory:
o Participants = volumes and masses with a distinct weight or gravitational pull
o Processes = vectors, tensions or dynamic forces
- Functional semiotic theory:
o Actor, goal and recipient
o Transaction = something the actor does to the goal
Analytical structure:
- Carrier and attribute instead of actor and goal
- The way participants fit together to make up a larger whole
- The carrier = represents the whole
- Possessive attributes = represents the parts
Participants in the image:
- Conjoined = when the entities are separated
- Compounded = welded together, still distinct components of the whole
- Fusion = the separate identities of the participants have disappeared
Elongation:
- Vertical = more pronounced distinction between top and bottom
- Horizontal:
o Causes a shape to lean towards the kind of structure in which what is positioned
on the left is presented as ‘given’ = already familiar to the reader
, o What is positioned on the right is presented as ‘new’ = information not yet
known to the reader
Visual processes:
- Narrative:
o When participants are connected by a vector = diagonal line in the image
o Actor = participants from whom or which the vector departs, may be fused with
the vector
- Conceptual = representing participants in terms of their class, structure or meaning
Narrative processes:
- Action processes:
o Transactional = actor vector goal:
Uni-directional = one participant is actor, the other is the goal
Bidirectional:
Each participant playing now the role of actor, now the role of
goal
Not clear if it is simultaneously or in succession
o Non-transactional = actor vector no goal
o Event = no actor vector goal
o Major process = the big action
o Minor process = the smaller action that is embedded in the major process
- Reactional processes:
o Transactional = reacter vector phenomenom
o Non-transactional = reacter vector non phenomenom
- Speech process and mental processes:
o Thought and dialogue balloons in comic strips
o Projective structure = the content or the balloon are not represented directly
- Conversion processes:
o Relay:
Participant who functions both as actor and goal
Vector actor vector goal vector actor
Common in representations of natural events
- Geometrical symbolism:
o Pictorial or abstract patterns as processes
- Circumstances:
o Secondary participants that are related to main participants
o Could be left out without affecting the basic proposition realized by the narrative
pattern
o Sorts of circumstances:
Locative circumstances:
Relate other participants to a specific participant (setting)
Contrast between foreground and background:
o The participants in the foreground overlap and partially
obscure the setting
o The setting is drawn or painted in less detail
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lottebartelds. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now