100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Boorsma & Chiaravalloti (2010) Arts Marketing Performance $3.18
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Boorsma & Chiaravalloti (2010) Arts Marketing Performance

 19 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of the article Arts Marketing Performance: An Artistic-Mission-Led Approach to Evaluation by Boorsma & Chiaravalloti (2010).

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • December 8, 2020
  • 4
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Boorsma & Chiaravalloti (2010) Arts Marketing Performance: An Artistic-Mission-Led Approach to
Evaluation
This article suggests evaluating the performance of arts marketing based on the contribution made to
the achievement of the arts organization’s artistic mission and proposes a model based on Kaplan
and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard to guide the artistic-mission-led evaluation of arts marketing
performance. By paying attention to the new strategic role of arts marketing within the emerging
relational view of the arts and by integrating recent literature on performance management in
nonprofit organizations, we make a theoretical contribution to the body of knowledge on arts
marketing performance evaluation.

Introduction
After reviewing the existing literature on the relationship between arts marketing objectives and
performance evaluation, we explain our choice of the concept of arts marketing based on a relational
view of the arts proposed by Boorsma (2006). Consequently, we propose a performance
management model for arts organizations based on this concept and built upon the Balanced
Scorecard (Kaplan and Norton 1992), which serves as a guide for an artistic-mission-led evaluation of
arts marketing performance.

Arts Marketing Objectives and Performance
Kotler and Scheff (1997, 54–55) as well as Kotler and Kotler (1998, 87–88) state that nonprofit
organizations pursue objectives other than maximizing profits and propose the following set of
possible management objectives for nonprofit museums and performing arts organizations:
 Surplus maximization (maximizing revenues minus costs)
 Revenue maximization
 Usage maximization (maximizing attendance numbers)
 Capacity targeting (encouraging or discouraging demand so as to align it with existing
capacity)
 Full or partial cost recovery (breaking even or putting a maximum on the annual deficit)
 Budget maximization (maximizing the size of the organization and the number of programs
offered)
 Producer satisfaction maximization (maximizing the staff’s own professional interests)
 In order for them to be able to evaluate performance, the chosen objectives ideally have to
be restated in the operational and measurable form known as goals. This is possible for
tangible objectives. Audience numbers and financial results are generally considered proper
indicators for evaluating marketing effectiveness as long as efficiency considerations do not
interfere with artistic decisions.

There are several reasons that can explain the preponderance of financial data and audience
numbers among arts marketing objectives and performance indicators.
- The system of public subsidies made arts organizations less alert to changes in consumer
behavior and to competition from the ever- expanding entertainment industry.
- The assumptions underlying arts marketing theory, according to which the role of arts
marketing is to support the accomplishment of the arts organization’s mission without
influencing the mission directly.

Organization’s Mission And Arts Marketing According To A Relational View Of Arts
Under the assumption of autonomy, the arts organization’s artistic mission is likely to be defined in
terms of the works of art that the organization wants to create, present, collect, and/or distribute.
The arts are no longer seen as a phenomenon that exists independently of general cultural practice:
instead they are now seen as a culturally or socially embedded phenomenon. Works of art and their
valuation are considered to be the product of social interaction.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller tuullatrisha. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.18. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

59063 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$3.18
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added