100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Article summary: The framing of social class distinctions through family food and eating practices - Wills, W., Backett-Milburn, K., Roberts, M. -., & Lawton, J. (2011) $3.24   Add to cart

Summary

Article summary: The framing of social class distinctions through family food and eating practices - Wills, W., Backett-Milburn, K., Roberts, M. -., & Lawton, J. (2011)

 36 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This is a summary of the article The framing of social class distinctions through family food and eating practices - Wills, W., Backett-Milburn, K., Roberts, M. -., & Lawton, J. (2011). This is part of the literature of the course Lifestyle and Consumption (CHL20806) at Wageningen university.

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • January 7, 2021
  • 4
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
For references see original article

Wills, W., Backett-Milburn, K., Roberts, M. -., & Lawton, J. (2011). The framing of social class distinctions through family food and
eating practices. Sociological Review, 59, 725-740. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1111%2Fj.1467- 954X.2011.02035.x


The framing of social class distinctions through family food and eating practices
N.B. For a full description of the methodology, analysis and results of this study, see the original article



Eating, and all aspects involved, is a socially constructed practice. Sociologists look at how food
and eating practices help to create social order and boundaries within families. This also
involves conflicts and tension. For example, when children refuse to eat a certain meal, which is
their way of showing autonomy. They also look at the role of women, ‘food work’, and the role of
men, providing the means to consume food. However, not only family, but also the social
influences outside the family influence eating practices.

The aim of this study is to draw two qualitative studies which examine the part that social class
played in (re)constructing and (re)producing everyday food and eating practices in families
with young teenagers. Of interest is the emotional response to class, the way class is lived,
experienced and ‘felt’. The approach of the authors has enabled them to use food and eating as a
lens onto the broader, class-based contexts of family life, whilst also helping them to understand
and explain the very different food and eating practices displayed by the parents and young
teenagers in their studies. These data help to illustrate aspects of the habitus and classed
distinctions of taste.

Class-based distinctions
Social class can be defined by the structural, economic, or cultural components which lead to the
unequal or unnatural divisions and dispositions that exist within society. This study tries to
understand middle class and working class food and eating practices by looking at Bourdieu’s
concept of habitus. Class becomes embodied by habitus. Habitus provides a way of classifying
practices behind the conditions of lifestyle. It is an unconscious set of beliefs, attitudes and
behaviors, imprinted by cultural and social context. It places people within a certain social
group. Bourdieu argues that habitus shapes everything, including changes in behavior. One can
alter their behavior. Despite this, he has been criticized for ignoring to what extent individuals
can reflect on their actions and their social position. Late modernity is seen as a time were
reflexive identity making plays quite a big role, and where social structured like class play a
smaller role than before.
Lash argues that reflexivity occurs in communities instead of individuals. He stated that shared
meanings and practices are still vital to communities, even though traditional modes of
production have become replaced by modern and postmodern information- and
communication-based structures.

Reflexivity can be interpreted in different ways. People may use it to be associated (or not) with
a particular social group. This related to the idea of Lash about winning and losing. Warde
argued that people who are afraid to make to wrong consumption choices, have the least
flexibility within a highly values and embedded system (aka losing). When this occurs the other
way around, one would be winning. In this study habitus is seen as creating the conditions for
action within everyday life.

Methodology

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller JFrederiqueKats. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.24. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75057 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.24
  • (0)
  Add to cart