100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
EU Law II: Substantive Law of the EU. - Important cases $6.47   Add to cart

Judgments

EU Law II: Substantive Law of the EU. - Important cases

 31 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

EU Law II: Substantive Law of the EU. Important cases discussed in the course EU Law II: Substantive Law of the EU. of the Bachelor European Studies at Maastricht University. ALSO very useful for students from other related bachelor studies or master studies. Covering ALL important cases of EU La...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 18  pages

  • January 9, 2021
  • 18
  • 2020/2021
  • Judgments
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Cases:
W1: F.R.: 2-3
W2: Q.R.: 4-7
W3: Persons: Entry & Residence: 8-10
W4: Persons: Equal Treatment: 11-12
W5: Persons: services/establishment/capital: 13-14
W6: Competition: Agreement/ CPs: 15-16
W7: Competition: State aid: 17-18




1

,W1: Persons: financial restrictions
What is an internal market?
- Bringing conditions as close as possible to those of a genuine internal market (Case 15/81
Gaston Schul).
- CJEU 15/81 Schul: Internal market (common market, single market)
- 26 TFEU: an area without internal frontiers and free movements of goods, persons, services
and capital.
- Art. 2-4 TEU
- Opinion AG Maduro Joined Cases C-158/04:
o Freedoms of movement essential elements of the fundamental status of nationals of
the MS
o Task of court: make sure MS do not adopt measures that lead to cross-border
situations being treated less favourably than purely national situations.
- à Negative integration/ removal of barriers.
Goods
- Products valued in money/ subject to commercial transaction à Commission v. Italy C-7/68.
Art treasures.
- Goods: possess tangible physical characteristics. Jägerskiöld/ Fennelly C-79/98
o Electricity is a good (Almelo C-393/92)
o Fishing license not (Jagerskiold v Gustafsson C-97/98)
o Lottery tickets not (Schindler C-275/92).
Art. 30 TFEU: customs duty
- Strict interpretation by the court.
- Any breach will be unlawful PER SE and cannot be justified under Art. 36 TFEU.
- However, 2 exceptions.
- Commission v. Italy C-7/68: CJEU looks at the effect rather that the purpose of the duty or
charge.
o Italy: protect treasures/ not revenue
o CJEU: UNLAWFUL: export trade in the goods in question was hindered by pecuniary
burden which it imposed on the price of the exported goods.
- CJEU Sociaal Fonds voor Diamantarbeiders C2&3-69.
o Purpose: neither raise money/ protect domestic industry
o UNLAWFUL: charge was imposed on goods because they had crossed a border.
- CEEs (Charges having Equivalent Effects/ Disguised Restrictions)
o Commission v. Italy (Statistical Levy case) Case 24/68.
o UNLAWFUL
o Any charge which is imposed unilaterally on domestic or foreign goods by reason of
the fact that they cross a frontier
o Even if
§ it is not imposed for the benefit of state
§ it is not discriminatory
§ it is not protective in effect
§ if it is not in competition with any domestic products
o CEEs for import and export! Co-operative Co-Frutta Srl C-193/85.: any charge having
equivalent effect covers any charge exacted at the time of or an account of
importation which, being borne specifically by an imported product to the exclusion
of the similar domestic product … and has the result of altering the cost price of the
imported product thereby producing the same restrictive effect on the free
movement of goods as a customs duty.




2

, Exceptions:
1. When the charge is a payment for a service rendered (given) to the importer/exported.
• Commission v. Belgium (warehousing) C-132/82.
o Specific and direct benefit actually conferred
o Payment in proportion to the service
o Inspections in the general interest are not a service rendered to the
importer
2. When the charge is payment for an inspection that is mandatory under EU law.
• Commission v. Germany (live animals) C-18/87.
• Inspections mandated by EU law must:
o Not exceed the actual costs of the inspections
o Be obligatory and uniform
o In the general interest of the Union
o Promote the free movement of good
• à Criteria satisfied: charge levied will not be classified as CEE.
(if it is absolutely clear, do not mention the conditions. Otherwise use the conditions).
Art. 110 TFEU: Internal taxation
- MS are allowed to impose neutral taxes (is directly effective). Case 57/65 Lütticke.
- CJEU: complete neutrality of internal taxation with regard to domestic and imported
products.
- Aim: prevent 28-30 TFEU being undermined by discriminatory internal taxation.
- TAX: a charge is an internal tax… if it related to a general system of internal dues applied
systematically to categories of products in accordance with objective criteria irrespective of
the origin of the products. CJEU Co-Frutta C-193/85 and CJEU Denkavit C-170/85.
- MS are free to subject products to a system of tax/ compatible with 110 TFEU if it is free
from any discriminatory or protective effects (CJEU Humblot C-112/84).
Question 1: Is there a reason for the distinction unrelated to origin?
YES: No violation of 110 TFEU
- Natural sweet wine (Com v. France C-196/85)
- Synthetic ethyl alcohol (Chemical Pharmaceutical SpA C-140/79).
- Cars (Com v. Greece C-132/88)
- Gambling machines (Bergandi C-252/86) à Q2à
SIMILAR? (1)
- Whisky v. Fruit liquor: Not similar. John Walker C-243/84.
- Similar: similar characteristics and meet the same needs from the view of consumers. Rewe
Zentrale Case 120/78.
- Wine from fruit and wine from grapes: similar. Com. v Denmark C-33/76.
o Same basic product and process
o Taste and alcohol content are similar
o Both met the same needs of consumers.
- Bananas versus other fruit: not similar. Com. v Italy C-184/85.
Similarity: yes? à Is there discrimination?
- Direct discrimination: related to origin/ prohibited/ no justification
- Indirect discrimination: prohibited unless objectively justified/proportionate (Humblot, Cars)
Breach? à MS must equalise the tax regime. (Not unlawful like 30 TFEU).
COMPETITION? (2)
Economic test! Cross-elasticity/ product substitutability. (CJEU Com v UK C-170/78 (Beer/wine)). Do
consumers switch when the good gets more expensive.
Degree is low: large difference in tax will give rise. Degree is high: compete/ the protective effect
must be taken away.
Breach? à MS required to remove the protective control. (Not unlawful like 30 TFEU).



3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MaxGregor. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.47. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.47  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart