Psychological and Neurological Consequences of Child Abuse
Summary
Articles Summary: Psychological and Neurological Consequences of Child Abuse
1 purchase
Course
Psychological and Neurological Consequences of Child Abuse
Institution
Universiteit Leiden (UL)
This 70-page summary of the articles for the exam in Psychological and Neurological Consequences of Child Abuse will give you a detailed overview of the course's relevant scientific literature.
psychological and neurological consequences of child abuse
summary
Written for
Universiteit Leiden (UL)
International Bachelor in Psychology
Psychological and Neurological Consequences of Child Abuse
All documents for this subject (1)
Seller
Follow
nhackmann1
Reviews received
Content preview
1
Psychological and Neurological
Consequences of Child Abuse
Summary of the Literature
Child Maltreatment and Risk for Psychopathology in Childhood
and Adulthood
- S.R. Jaffee, 2017
Epidemiology of Abuse and Neglect
- in 2014, approximately 3.9 million children were investigated for allegations of abuse or neglect
- 20% of these investigations were substantiated = 702 000 children nationally/9.4 per 1000 children
in population
- Review focuses on relationship between childhood maltreatment and mental health in childhood
and adulthood
- Maltreatment:
- Neglect = failure to meet children’ basic physical needs with respect to clothing, hygiene, food and
safety
- Emotional, sexual and physical abuse
- physical abuse = harm by caregiver or someone responsible for child resulting in non-accidental
physical injury
- 17% of victims are victims of physical abuse
- 8% victim of sexual abuse and 6% victims of psychological maltreatment , 6.8% victims of other
forms
- Children younger than 3 more likely to be victimised
- Boys and girls equally likely, African American children most likely
- Predictors: family poverty, young motherhood, parental history of antisocial behavior and
perpetrator’s history of maltreatment
Measuring Maltreatment
- childhood maltreatment is typically measured by retrospective self-report
- Biased by current mental state
- Subject to omission
- experiences in adulthood also biased retrospective reports
- Childhood history of maltreatment is actually poor predictor of who will abuse drugs as adult
- This review: focus on prospective, longitudinal studies in which maltreatment was measured in
childhood, informant reports
Maltreatment and Risk for Psychopathology
- whether maltreated children and adults are at elevated risk for psychopathology
- Studies that:
- Have prospective research design
- Demographically matched control sample or statistical adjustments
- Psychometrically valid measures
Maltreatment and Risk for Internalising and Externalising Psychopathology
- victims of maltreatment are at elevated risk for many externalising problems: ADHD, conduct
disorder, oppositional de iant disorder, delinquency, antisocial behavior and some studies but some
not indicate higher symptoms of substance abuse
- In adolescence, childhood and extent into adulthood
- adulthood:
- higher rates of antisocial personality disorder
- Self reported crime and criminal arrest
- Mixed results on drug and alcohol use
- also at risk for many internalising problems in childhood:
f
, 2
- Major Depressive disorder
- Anxiety disorders
- PTSD
- Symptoms of trauma
- Internalising symptoms
- Adulthood:
- MDD
- Anxiety disorders
- 59% of depression and anxiety cases worldwide are attributable to childhood maltreatment
- PTSD and its symptoms
- Via two pathways: maltreatment increases mental disorders and maltreatment sensitises the
neurobiological response to subsequent trauma
Maltreatment and Risk for Personality Disorders, Psychotic Symptoms and Suicide
- as adults, at risk for borderline personality disorder
- Also risk for Cluster B (dramatic) and Cluster c (anxious) personality disorders
- Elevated risk for suicide in childhood and adulthood
- Also self-injury elevated
- Elevated rates of psychotic symptoms in adolescence
- Elevated risks for psychotic disorder, schizoaffective disorder or schizophrenia
Causal Status Of Effects
- being neglected or abused as a child could cause victims to develop mental disorders that emerge in
childhood or adulthood
- Alternatively, history of maltreatment could be accounted for by genetic or non-genetic factors
associated with maltreatment
- Research designs that are best suited to choose between genetic and non-genetic explanations are
particularly ill-suited to the study of maltreatment
- Adoption design: social workers screen out adoptive parents likely to perpetrate and thus rates
are low
- Twin design: exposed to same risks factor etc. but rare that one twin is mistreated and the other
is not
- research designs that match maltreated children with sociodemographically similar youth may
therefore be the most feasible way of estimating unique effects of maltreatment on psychopathology
- One study showed: maltreated youth had signi icantly more depressive symptoms and suicidal
thoughts, substance use problems and criminal behaviors
- Socioeconomic disadvantage itself is associated with high rates of emotional and behavioral health
problems, poor life course outcomes and risk for maltreatment perpetration
Intergenerational Transmission of Maltreatment
- cycle of violence hypothesis
- Proposes that adults who experienced abuse/neglect in childhood are at risk of maltreating their
own children
- Dif icult to study
- best-designed studies of the cycle: of icial records of maltreatment are available in both generations
and also self-reports
- Odds of an individual being reported to child protective services because their child was maltreated
were twice as great for parents who had documented childhood histories of victimisation
- On basis of self-report, rates were equal
- Overrepresentation of parents with histories of abuse -> detection bias
- Cycle of violence is not inevitable -> buffered by safe and nurturing relationships
- Child protective services has bias to investigate and substantiative cases of abuse or neglect when
they know the parent has a history of maltreatment
Mediators of Maltreatment Effects
- multiple potential mechanisms by which maltreatment increases risk
- 3 phenomena have been robustly associated with maltreatment:
- Hyper-vigilance to threat
- De icits in emotion recognition
- Insensitivity to rewards
Hyper-vigilance to Threat
f f f
, 3
- attention bias = tendency to devote more attention to mild threats, robust correlate of anxiety
- Children could become sensitised to threatening stimuli because of their exposure to anger etc.
- Increases risk for anxiety
- Selectively attentive to anger cues, dif iculty disengaging from anger cues and more likely to identify
ambitious facial expressions of anger
- Excessive attention to anger -> more symptoms of anxiety
- Method for assessing attention bias:
- Pairs of faces appear on either side of monitor
- One face any, one neutral
- Then press button where dot appears
- Attention bias higher: when children take longer to identify dot’s location when it appeared on
same side of the screen as the neutral face
- biased attention to angry faces, but not so sad or happy faces
- Greater bias to anger relative to youth who experience moderate or low levels of harsh parenting
- Attention bias has also been shown in children exposed to more normative forms of harsh parenting
- Youth with more authoritarian parenting -> more critical, higher negative affect and attention
bias, social anxiety
- government run foster care in Romania -> greater attention bias than youth who were randomised
at birth to receive Forster care interventions
- Positivity bias: lower levels of externalising problems, better social adjustment and engagement and
fewer emotionally withdrawn attachment disorder symptoms
- Not all studies ind this bias
- Or depending on short or long serotonin transporter
- biased attention to threat involves limbic and prefrontal cortical circuitry -> heightened amygdala
activity
- Heightened right amygdala reactivity to angry and fearful versus neutral faces in psychiatrically
healthy adults and bilateral amygdala reactivity to emotional faces versus neutral ones
- Activation limbic system mediate the effect of child emotional abuse on symptoms of anxiety in
adults
- Reduced activation of right dorsolateral PFC in response to fear and anger -> mediated associated
between abuse and anxiety
- hypervigilance could also explain increased rates of aggressive behavior in maltreated youth
- Social information processing styles characterised by a tendency to attribute hostile intent to
others whose behavior is ambiguous
- Physically abused children are not only more likely to make hostile attributions for a character’s
behaviour in vignettes involving possible social provocation, but also generate more aggressive
responses than comparison youth
- Neglected children generate more aggressive responses than comparison youth to vignettes in
which a child tries to gain entry to a peer group and the group’s response is positive, ambiguous
or negative
- low threshold for perceiving anger and a tendency to allocate attention to anger may increase the
likelihood that maltreated youth will attribute hostile intent to others’ behavior and react
accordingly
- Generate more aggressive response to potential social provocation and fewer prosocial responses
- More negative affect and punish their partner more
- Maltreated children and adults exhibit a biased attention to threatening stimuli, which partially
explains their risk for anxiety and aggression
- Dif iculty disengaging attention from anger cues
- Differences in indings could re lect the fact that samples vary in terms of their maltreatment
exposure snd differ in terms of PTSD symptomatology
De icits in Emotion Recognition
- ability to accurately recognise and understand emotions is a key developmental task that facilitates
social interaction
- Children and adults who exhibit de icits in emotion understanding are more likely to suffer social
rejection
- Understanding of emotions partly derives from parents’ efforts to model and explain emotions
- Quality of emotion socialisation is likely to be different in abusive or neglectful families
- eg. Maltreating mothers have been shown to engage in less validation, coaching and more
invalidation of children’s emotions and themselves express less prototypical emotions
f ff f f f
, 4
- high-risk parents are less accurate in emotion recognition, thus can not respond appropriately to
their children’s emotions
- Maltreated youth are poorer at identifying facial expression of emotion
- Neglected children -> less likely to differentiate facial expressions of emotion
- Physically abused children -> show bias to recognising emotions as angry
- Also dif iculties with matching emotional outcomes with their common elicitors
- Effects bigger for emotion recognition than understanding
- Adversely affects their abilities to respond appropriately when others express emotions
- Affect their ability to predict reaction that their own negative behaviour will elicit from others .>
heightened likelihood to be rejected by peers
Reward Responsiveness
- reduced responsiveness to reward is hypothesised to be a neural mechanism by which
maltreatment increases risk for depression
- Less sensitive to cues for reward than non-maltreated controls
- Mesolimbic dopaminergic circuitry projects to basal ganglia -> involved in responsively to reward in
anticipation
- Rate reward cues less positively and are more aroused when loss is anticipated
- Less ventral striatum activation in anticipation of rewards
- Rates of depression tend to increase in adolescence and individual differences in the development of
reward related neural circuitry associated with early life stress may underlie this increase
- Youth who experience neglect showed less change in ventral striatal activity
- Mediates the association between neglect and adolescent symptoms of depression
- Makes it more plausible that reduced responsively to reward is a potential risk mechanism
- anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is involved in reinforced learning
- Slow maturation of ACC leaves it vulnerable to impacts of chronic stressors
- Excessive release of glucocorticoids as part of the stress response
- sexually abused women less accurate in picking reward stimuli
- Due to affected development of ACC -> affecting the ability to learn from positive experiences and
perpetuating maladaptive decision making that increases risk for depression
- less responsive to reward
- Don’t discriminate cues
Moderators of Child Maltreatment
- factors that exacerbate effects of maltreatment on risk for psychopathology (diathesis stress
framework)
- Or as factors that promote competence in mental health, academic or interpersonal domains despite
exposure to maltreatment (resilience framework)
- 12-22% of those maltreated are de ined as resilient
- Effect of maltreatment on risk for psychopathology is largely similar across demographic groups
- Evidence that the association between maltreatment and risk for psychopathology varies as a
function of maltreatment subtype is weak and inconsistent
- Maltreatment that is chronic tends to be more strongly associated with risk for psychopathology
than maltreatment that occurs sporadically or that is con ined to a single developmental period
Genetic Moderators of Maltreatment Effects
- genotype by maltreatment (GxE) interaction
- Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) genotype
- Serotonin Transporter-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR; SLC6A4)
MAOA x maltreatment
- MAOA gene is involved in the metabolism of dopamine, serotonin and norepinephrine
- Found in study: MAOA gene associated with violent behaviour among males in a large dutch
family
- Low activity variant that leads to lower MAOA expression and a high activity variant that leads to
higher MAOA expression
- MAOA gene is located on X chromosome -> male are hemizygous and females can carry zero, one
or two copies
- Men who had experienced abuse in a longitudinal study had elevated levels of antisocial behavior
problems if they carried the low activity variant of the MAOA gene
- Not at risk when high activity variant
- Association between early life adversity and antisocial outcomes were signi icantly stronger for
males who carried the low versus high activity variant of the MAOA gene
f f f f
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nhackmann1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
