Research Methods In Clinical Neuropsychology (PSMNM2.1B)
Summary
Summary Research Methods in Clinical Neuropsychology
61 views 4 purchases
Course
Research Methods In Clinical Neuropsychology (PSMNM2.1B)
Institution
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (RuG)
Summary of the seven following lectures:
1: Designing and implementing basic study designs
2: Effect sizes and implications for power
3: Analysis of correlational data & Assessment of multiple deficits
4: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
5: Classification in diagnostic tests
6: Single case...
Research Methods In Clinical Neuropsychology (PSMNM2.1B)
All documents for this subject (5)
Seller
Follow
eefkedej
Reviews received
Content preview
Research Methods in Clinical Neuropsychology
Introductory test:
1. Name two advantages of effect sizes over significance tests?
• Significance depends on sample size, ES not
• ES helps to compare significant effects with each other
2. Your study is underpowered! What does it mean in plain language?
• Given patients with dementia are really impaired in prospective memory, it is unlikely that
you will reveal this effect in your study
3. Name two different active control group designs!
• Dose control (the same but less intensive treatment)
• Dismantling design (same treatment, but one element of your treatment is taken out)
• These designs are to find out what is really responsible for your treatment effects
4. How to report the validity of a diagnostic test?
• Overall diagnostic accuracy (e.g. AUC = area under the curve)
• Sensitivity towards disease (classify the ones being sick), specificity towards no disease
(classify the ones not having it).
5. Name two single case research designs!
• ABAB design
• Multiple baseline design
6. What is the Reliable Change Index?
• Indicates the change in a measure from one time to another (e.g. before and after
treatment), taking into consideration the variability of scores at the first time, as well as the
test-retest reliability
7. How does a Delphi methodology contribute to reaching consensus?
• A Delphi methodology includes a group of experts on a topic (the expert panel) and
facilitates collective decision making by a structured and anonymous way of communication
Lecture 1A. Basic study designs:
Designing, implementing, analyzing
Group designs: Selection, recruitment,
measurement
Group designs: >>
- Retrospective (asking how the
patient was doing before the
research)
- Case-control or cross sectional:
for each patient is one control
person (similar in characteristics,
background information).
Selection, recruitment, measurement:
- Internal validity: our planned
research has not been performed
properly, mistakes, dropouts.
,Selection and recruitment
➢ Establishing selection criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- Demographic characteristics (65+ or below 65)
- Clinical characteristics
- Geographic characteristics
- Temporal characteristics
Exclusion criteria:
- Risk of being lost at follow up
- Inability to provide good data
- At risk for possible adverse effects
- Non-representative for population
➢ Sampling
Nonprobability samples:
- Convenience samples (mostly done, just take who you can get)
- Snowball sampling
Probability sample:
- Simple random samples (randomly picking)
- Systematic random sample (randomly picking but according to a certain system; every other
person)
- Stratified random sample (certain equal distributions; 50 males 50 females, or ages equally
represented)
- Cluster sample (for example 3 out of 20 clinics are randomly picked, but all patients from
those clinics are used)
Random sample: sounds perfect, but is almost not possible in clinical research (convenience
sample is a selective group of people, always consider this in your discussion)
Measurement:
➢ Scaling
Categorical or continuous variables?
- Continuous variables contain more information, are more flexible, and often preferred.
- Categorical is straight forward: it’s clear, someone can work or not. Yes or no.
➢ Precision (reliability)
- Degree to which individuals retain relative position within distribution of scores from one
testing session to another (same ranking, relative to other people)
- Most often presented as correlation in test-retest reliability (stability)
- People with disorders are typically more fluctuating than the general population (healthy
people)
,➢ Accuracy (validity)
- Good: groups that assume to be having attention problems should be worse than a healthy
group. If they are not, then the test is not really measuring the right thing >> not accurate.
- Discriminative validity: instrument’s ability to distinguish between relevant participant
groups.
- Incremental validity: how it works together with other measures of similar constructs.
➢ Sensitivity: Sensitive measure required that detects improvements even in healthy people!
➢ How to reduce random error
- Standardizing the measurement
- Training the staff doing assessments
- Automating the instrument
- Blinding
- Repeating the measurement
➢ Modern assessment methods: Computerized or paper-pencil assessment?
Reasons that may explain the reluctance:
1. Psychometric obstacles
- Reliability of traditional and computerized tests
- Equivalence of computer tests and paper-and-pencil tests
- Quality of normative data
- Norms are not valid anymore: it’s easier to just stick to the paper-pencil test then.
2. Technical obstacles
- E.g. speed in technical developments hamper work on psychometric properties
3. Theoretical obstacles
- Extensiveness of the body of knowledge
- Theoretical paradigms and their practical value
4. Strategic obstacles
- Rapidly growing number of new approaches results in incomparability of results
➢ Some ideas about the future of neuropsychological testing
- Advantages:
o save time
o More accurate according to scoring
o Cheaper, it can be done by an assistant instead of psychologist self.
o Classic scoring of trail-making test does not distinguish between what the person is
actually doing, sloppy worker with many mistakes or very accurate but slow worker.
- Disadvantage:
o lose information by not observing how people do the test etc.
- Computerized adaptive testing
o Gain in efficiency (time and precision) by selecting next item based on performance on
current item.
- Nominal response model
o Different meanings of different types of errors (e.g. response style on TMT)
- Test linking
o Direct comparison of tests and integration into individual report (e.g. ANDI.nl)
- Person fit statistics
o Performance validity based on fit of one item relative to overall performance
- Web-based testing, mobile platforms, wearables
, o Assessment goes out of clinic into “real life”, increase in longitudinal repeated
assessments
Lecture 1B. Pitfalls in significance testing
➢ Post-hoc testing
Principle of a randomized
controlled trial:
No hypotheses of group differences on demographic variables? >> No testing necessary
➢ Cherry picking = focusing on the results that fit you
➢ Nonspecific hypotheses:
- Hypothesis: ‘Mental disorders have a
genetic underpinning‘
>> Correlation of 1000 gene loci
with 10 mental disorders
>> 10.000 possible specific hypothesis
- Problem in α-error adjustment!
o α-error correction by .05/10.000
o Controls for α-error inflation, but drastically reduces power!
- Better: Stepwise hypotheses generating and testing
o Exploratory (hypothesis-generating) study: No significance testing
o Hypothesis testing on independent data set (on specific hypothesis)
➢ Multiple testing
- One hypothesis should NOT be examined with multiple tests
- Introduction of multiple hypotheses is possible
o Should be conceptually independent
o Each hypothesis treated as if tested in a different study
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller eefkedej. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
