100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Applied Data Analysis Assignment 5 Reliability Analysis $8.04   Add to cart

Other

Applied Data Analysis Assignment 5 Reliability Analysis

1 review
 68 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

reliability analyses Cronbach’s alpha the tree-factor solution Component plot of the two-factor solution with VARIMAX rotationRotated component loadings and communalities of 4-factor solution

Preview 3 out of 18  pages

  • January 18, 2021
  • 18
  • 2019/2020
  • Other
  • Unknown

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: leeruil123 • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
Assignment 5
Social support in women’s networks

,1a.
We conducted five reliability analyses for each of the support scales and one for the network
satisfaction scale to measure the overlapping construct consistently and if the items are
sufficiently correlated. The first reliability analysis was for the informational construct in social
support scale which contained names addresses, info career, tips suggestions, and share
experiences item. The overall Cronbach’s alpha value was .55. Since this survey is meant for
research, the critical value is .70, which meant the informational construct is not reliable. As can
be seen in Table 1, Cronbach’s alpha would increase to .59 if info career item was deleted.
Therefore, it would be better if info career was removed from this construct.

Table 1.
Reliability measures if the item was deleted for informational construct

Scale Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

Names addresses 5.14 .793 .323 .480

Info career 5.33 .833 .214 .589

Tips suggestions 5.06 .713 .536 .288

Share experiences 4.94 .982 .303 .502


After info career item deleted from the informational construct, reliability analysis was run
again. This time, the Cronbach’s alpha value was raised to .59 which still not higher than the
critical value of .70. When look again at the item, as can be seen in Table 2, it seems share
experiences need to be deleted so the Cronbach’s alpha value could increase to .65. Thus, the
share experiences item was removed from informational construct.




Table 2.
Reliability measures if the item was deleted for informational construct after removing info
career item

, Scale Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

Names addresses 3.65 .376 .410 .489

Tips suggestions 3.57 .365 .551 .240

Share experiences 3.45 .588 .275 .648

When narrowing the items again for informational construct, leaving just share experiences and
tips suggestions, the Cronbach’s alpha value was .65. Even after deleting two items, the
Cronbach’s alpha was still not exceeding the critical value of .70. Furthermore, there was also no
more items that can be excluded to raise the value (see Table 3).

Table 3.
Reliability measures if the item was deleted for informational construct after removing info
career and share experiences item

Scale Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

Names addresses 1.77 .180 .482 -

Tips suggestions 1.69 .217 .482 -


The second reliability analysis focused on the construct of instrumental and made use of the
facilities, intro clients, learn skills, practical help, intro job, do task for me, and improvement.
The Cronbach’s Alpha for instrumental construct also not exceed the critical value of .70
(Cronbach’s α = .62). When look at Cronbach’s alpha if item deleted, it seems the Cronbach’s
alpha increases when learn skills item is removed (see Table 4). Therefore, learn skills item was
removed from the instrumental construct.


Table 4.
Reliability measures if the item was deleted for instrumental construct

Scale Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rizzidays. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.04. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.04  3x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart