100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

Applied Data Analysis Assignment 5 Reliability Analysis

Rating
2.0
(1)
Sold
3
Pages
18
Uploaded on
18-01-2021
Written in
2019/2020

reliability analyses Cronbach’s alpha the tree-factor solution Component plot of the two-factor solution with VARIMAX rotationRotated component loadings and communalities of 4-factor solution

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
January 18, 2021
Number of pages
18
Written in
2019/2020
Type
Other
Person
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

Assignment 5
Social support in women’s networks

,1a.
We conducted five reliability analyses for each of the support scales and one for the network
satisfaction scale to measure the overlapping construct consistently and if the items are
sufficiently correlated. The first reliability analysis was for the informational construct in social
support scale which contained names addresses, info career, tips suggestions, and share
experiences item. The overall Cronbach’s alpha value was .55. Since this survey is meant for
research, the critical value is .70, which meant the informational construct is not reliable. As can
be seen in Table 1, Cronbach’s alpha would increase to .59 if info career item was deleted.
Therefore, it would be better if info career was removed from this construct.

Table 1.
Reliability measures if the item was deleted for informational construct

Scale Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

Names addresses 5.14 .793 .323 .480

Info career 5.33 .833 .214 .589

Tips suggestions 5.06 .713 .536 .288

Share experiences 4.94 .982 .303 .502


After info career item deleted from the informational construct, reliability analysis was run
again. This time, the Cronbach’s alpha value was raised to .59 which still not higher than the
critical value of .70. When look again at the item, as can be seen in Table 2, it seems share
experiences need to be deleted so the Cronbach’s alpha value could increase to .65. Thus, the
share experiences item was removed from informational construct.




Table 2.
Reliability measures if the item was deleted for informational construct after removing info
career item

, Scale Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

Names addresses 3.65 .376 .410 .489

Tips suggestions 3.57 .365 .551 .240

Share experiences 3.45 .588 .275 .648

When narrowing the items again for informational construct, leaving just share experiences and
tips suggestions, the Cronbach’s alpha value was .65. Even after deleting two items, the
Cronbach’s alpha was still not exceeding the critical value of .70. Furthermore, there was also no
more items that can be excluded to raise the value (see Table 3).

Table 3.
Reliability measures if the item was deleted for informational construct after removing info
career and share experiences item

Scale Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted

Names addresses 1.77 .180 .482 -

Tips suggestions 1.69 .217 .482 -


The second reliability analysis focused on the construct of instrumental and made use of the
facilities, intro clients, learn skills, practical help, intro job, do task for me, and improvement.
The Cronbach’s Alpha for instrumental construct also not exceed the critical value of .70
(Cronbach’s α = .62). When look at Cronbach’s alpha if item deleted, it seems the Cronbach’s
alpha increases when learn skills item is removed (see Table 4). Therefore, learn skills item was
removed from the instrumental construct.


Table 4.
Reliability measures if the item was deleted for instrumental construct

Scale Corrected Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item
Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted
$9.07
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Document also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
3 year ago

2.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
1
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
rizzidays Universiteit Leiden
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
18
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
16
Documents
27
Last sold
2 year ago

3.0

3 reviews

5
0
4
1
3
1
2
1
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions