100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Lecture notes 'Nudging' 2020/2021 $3.24   Add to cart

Class notes

Lecture notes 'Nudging' 2020/2021

1 review
 52 views  6 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Lecture notes of the course 'Nudging' 2020/2021

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • January 23, 2021
  • 7
  • 2020/2021
  • Class notes
  • J.s. benjamins
  • All classes

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: marlotteketelaar • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
Nudging lectures

Lecture 1

Nudging is a behavior change method. Nudging relies on a different system: two ways to think:

1. Automatic/Impulsive
2. Reflective/Rational

What system do we use more often? We make a lot of mental shortcuts, so we use the automatic
system more often.

What kind of shortcuts?

- Shortcuts to perceive the world/make it easier to perceive the world: e.g. cheerleader effect.
People look more attractive in a group than when looked at individually. This is because we
attribute group characteristics to each individual, this is easier for our brain. Also a mental
shortcut: clustering illusion. Random groups of dots are perceived as a pattern by humans.
- Shortcuts we use to judge/perceive ourself: e.g. ‘IKEA-effect’. If you put effort into something
you yourself produce, you perceive it as more valuable than when a store has built it already.
We think our expertise is as high as an IKEA employee. Also: Planning fallacy: we think we are
quicker with different actions (e.g. studying) than we are in reality. We overestimate our
ability.

We’re not always aware of our mental shortcuts, so that might pose some problems.

GI Joe bias: we think that knowing/being aware of our mental shortcuts/cognitive biases/heuristics, is
sufficient in overcoming them, but that is not the case. Most actions we do are based on e.g. habits.
 That’s were nudging comes to play. Because our behavior is so influenced by mental shortcuts,
nudges are really suited to help alter our behavior.

Biases are not always a bad thing, but there are biases that lead to suboptimal choices. We can also
make use of those biases via nudges. A Nudge is any aspect of the choice architecture that alters
people’s behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their
economic incentives. E.g. ‘default bias’; people tend to go for the default option, so if you make the
default option the ‘right’ option, you nudge people in the good direction. However, you’re
influencing people – subconsciously – to make choices you want them to make, is that manipulative?

Libertarian paternalism: preserve people’s freedom of choice, but also nudge them into making the
best/healthiest choice. So don’t forbid choices, but make the best choices easier to make.

What kind of behavior should we nudge? Choices that:

- Have a delayed (positive) effect
- Are difficult
- Are infrequent
- Have poor feedback
- Have an unclear outcome

What makes a good nudge?

iNcentives: make the desired effects rewarding

Understand mappings: make choice outcomes clear

, Defaults: make use of laziness shortcuts

Give feedback: make choice-outcome clear

Expect error: by foreseeing shortcuts people will use

Structure complex choices: make choice outcome clear

Lecture 2:

The accessibility of a thought depends both on the characteristics of the cognitive system and on the
presence of an appropriate stimulus.

Nudges make ‘good’ choices more attractive and easy. There is theory behind nudges, not just an
idea. Some people worry about nudges their possible manipulation. Others think there is no problem
with it, if the freedom of choice is still intact.

Herbert Simon’s bounded rationality: E.g.: De theorie van Herbert A Simon dat besluitvorming zelden
volledig rationeel plaatsvindt. Op basis van onderzoek concludeerde Simon dat managers vaak snel
kiezen voor een tevredenstellende oplossing in plaats van voor de beste oplossing. People don’t have
the cognitive capacity to consider all pros and cons.

Classic economic theorists propose theories of rational decision making: people consider all options
and choose the one with maximum utility. However, full rationality is a normative standard
compared to which humans underperform.

In 1950s still behaviorism: they thought that the mental processes underlying behavior were
inaccessible (black box).

System 1 thinking (automatic) was discovered as part of the cognitive revolution after behaviorism.
System 2 (conscious) was ‘invented’ to regulate the irrational system 1. Nudges rely on system 1.

System 1 is default; this system is older: swift thinking is more adaptive than slow thinking, in case
immediate decisions are required to survive.

System 2 is the younger system; reflective consciousness and the capacity to think hypothetically
about the future.

Is System 1 prone to errors? Yes, that could be. Examples: Stroop task and the bat/ball example.
System 2 is not designed to correct System 1. But not always error prone. E.g. experts find it very
hard to explain their decisions; because of their experience they have an understanding that is
automatic.  conscious deliberation may interfere, and experts might make more mistakes.

Critical words on dual systems:

Are they truly separate systems? Different features do not necessarily coincide. Unconscious =/
unintentional =/ uncontrollable =/ efficient. E.g. you might think a long time about what to get for
lunch, and want a healthy lunch, but end up with a hamburger.

Transparency of nudges does not ruin effects. Nudge was still effective. People tend to see the
default as an implicit recommendation.

What about ‘System 2 nudges?’ They are aimed at enhancing decision making competency. Type 2
nudges attract attention to reflectively adjust behavior by engaging System 2. Conventional
educational campaigns that help make complex choices are different from Type 2 nudges. Type 2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sierdejonge. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.24. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

57727 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.24  6x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart