Dit is een volledige uitwerking van de hoorcolleges Burgerlijk Procesrecht.
(zie ook mijn samenvatting van Burgerlijk Procesrecht --> hierin worden deze uitwerkingen bondig samengevat)
Inhoudsopgave
Hoorcollege 1 – Burgerlijk Procesrecht................................................................................................................9
Burgerlijk procesrecht..........................................................................................................................................9
Burgerlijk procesrecht........................................................................................................................................10
Wetboek van Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering:........................................................................................................10
Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW)...................................................................................................................................11
Art. 6 EVRM.......................................................................................................................................................11
Wet RO................................................................................................................................................................11
Procesrecht in beweging (1)...............................................................................................................................11
Procesvertegenwoordiging.................................................................................................................................14
Raad voor de rechtspraak..................................................................................................................................14
Nogmaals de rol van het Burgerlijk procesrecht:..............................................................................................15
Overheidsrechter > competentie....................................................................................................................16
Rechtbank...........................................................................................................................................................17
Procesrecht in beweging (2)...............................................................................................................................17
NS voor de rechter om compensatie voor overvolle treinen..............................................................................18
OVERHEIDSRECHTER EN ADR......................................................................................................................18
ENKELE KENMERKEN OVERHEIDSRECHTSPRAAK...................................................................................19
ADR....................................................................................................................................................................19
ARBITRAGE > voordelen..................................................................................................................................20
Bindend advies....................................................................................................................................................21
Geschilbeslechting betekent nog geen geschiloplossing!!..................................................................................21
Mediation............................................................................................................................................................22
Mediation: vrijwilligheid. Dus niet:...................................................................................................................22
Hoorcollege 2 – Burgerlijk Procesrecht..............................................................................................................24
Grondbeginselen van procesrecht......................................................................................................................24
Art. 6 EVRM (‘fair trial’)...................................................................................................................................24
Hoofdbeginselen (vervolg).................................................................................................................................25
Ad 2) Hoor en wederhoor...................................................................................................................................27
‘oral hearing’: recht op pleidooi........................................................................................................................28
NJ 2012/76 (Weef c.s./Artesia)...........................................................................................................................28
NJ 2012/76 (2)....................................................................................................................................................29
“Oral hearing” onder KEI en Spoedwet KEI....................................................................................................30
‘oral hearing’: recht op pleidooi........................................................................................................................31
Verhoeven/Staat:................................................................................................................................................31
Dipasa Europe/Huyton (JBPr 2003/22).............................................................................................................33
Dipasa Europe/Huyton (2).................................................................................................................................33
JBPr 2011, 16 (Van Rens c.s./Waalwijk)...........................................................................................................34
1
, NJ 2015/233........................................................................................................................................................34
Ad 5: Motivering.................................................................................................................................................36
Hoorcollege 3 – Burgerlijk procesrecht...............................................................................................................38
Partijautonomie en rechterlijke lijdelijkheid......................................................................................................38
Partijautonomie <> Rechtelijke lijdelijkheid:...................................................................................................39
Partij-autonomie.................................................................................................................................................40
Art 24 Rv.............................................................................................................................................................41
Feiten > art. 149 lid 1 en 2 Rv:..........................................................................................................................42
Art 23 Rv.............................................................................................................................................................42
KEI......................................................................................................................................................................45
Echter:................................................................................................................................................................45
Minder lijdelijke rechter.....................................................................................................................................46
Minder lijdelijke rechter.....................................................................................................................................46
De googlende rechter: toegestaan?....................................................................................................................47
Feiten of omstandigheden van algemene bekendheid:.......................................................................................48
Nadere opmerking t.a.v. art 25 Rv:....................................................................................................................49
Art 25 Rv.............................................................................................................................................................50
Hoorcollege 4 – Burgerlijk procesrecht...............................................................................................................51
Gang naar de rechter.........................................................................................................................................51
Beslissingen rechter............................................................................................................................................51
Waarom uitspraak nodig?..................................................................................................................................52
Waarom uitspraak nodig? (2)............................................................................................................................52
Wetboek van Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering (Rv).................................................................................................53
Digitale procedure (KEI)...................................................................................................................................54
Onderscheid........................................................................................................................................................54
Dagvaarding of verzoekschrift?.........................................................................................................................55
Dagvaarding versus verzoekschrift....................................................................................................................55
DAGVAARDINGSPROCEDURE.......................................................................................................................56
CASUS Foster Financieringen / Maria Martel..................................................................................................57
Bevoegdheid rechter...........................................................................................................................................57
Dagvaarding.......................................................................................................................................................59
Exploot................................................................................................................................................................59
Inhoud dagvaarding...........................................................................................................................................60
Dagvaarding.......................................................................................................................................................60
Uitbrengen dagvaarding....................................................................................................................................61
Aanbrengen dagvaarding...................................................................................................................................61
Uitbrengen dagvaarding (als exploot)...............................................................................................................62
Uitbrengen dagvaarding (in buitenland)............................................................................................................62
Termijn van dagvaarden.....................................................................................................................................63
Hoorcollege 5 – Burgerlijk procesrecht...............................................................................................................70
Dagvaarding (feiten/gronden/petitum)...............................................................................................................70
Dagvaarding (feiten/gronden/petitum) – 2.........................................................................................................71
Dagvaarding (feiten/gronden/petitum) – 3.........................................................................................................71
Vaststaande feiten...............................................................................................................................................72
Dagvaarding.......................................................................................................................................................72
‘Gebrek’ in uitgebrachte dagvaarding...............................................................................................................73
Herstelexploit (120 lid 2 Rv)..............................................................................................................................74
‘Gebrek’ in uitgebrachte dagvaarding...............................................................................................................74
Staalbouw / EZH (NJ 1995/269)........................................................................................................................75
‘Gebrek’ bij aanbrengen dagvaarding...............................................................................................................76
Dagvaarding tegen niet-bestaande rechtsdag....................................................................................................77
Voortschrijdend procesrecht..............................................................................................................................77
Verloop rechtbankprocedure..............................................................................................................................78
VERSTEK (139 Rv).............................................................................................................................................79
VERSTEK (vervolg)............................................................................................................................................79
VERZET..............................................................................................................................................................80
VERZET..............................................................................................................................................................80
Verloop rechtbankprocedure..............................................................................................................................81
Verloop rechtbankprocedure (2)........................................................................................................................81
Verloop rechtbankprocedure..............................................................................................................................82
Wijziging eis.......................................................................................................................................................82
Inhoud Conclusie van Antwoord (CvA)..............................................................................................................83
Exceptieve verweren...........................................................................................................................................83
Principale verweren...........................................................................................................................................84
Mondelinge behandeling (87 – 81 Rv)...............................................................................................................85
Mondelinge behandeling (2)...............................................................................................................................87
Drie verschillende vonnissen..............................................................................................................................88
CASUS................................................................................................................................................................89
3
, Hoorcollege 6 – Burgerlijk procesrecht...............................................................................................................90
Procedure in eerste aanleg lll – kort geding......................................................................................................90
CASUS (NJ 2009/50)..........................................................................................................................................90
Vorderingen eiser Ammerlaan...........................................................................................................................91
Vonnis (art. 229).................................................................................................................................................92
Tussenvonnis (art. 232)......................................................................................................................................93
Deelvonnis..........................................................................................................................................................94
Inhoud eindvonnis..............................................................................................................................................95
Procedure bij de kantonrechter..........................................................................................................................96
Bevoegdheid kantonrechter................................................................................................................................96
Verschillen met rechtbankprocedure..................................................................................................................97
Kort geding.........................................................................................................................................................98
Eisen...................................................................................................................................................................99
Ad 1) Spoedeisend belang..................................................................................................................................99
Ad 2) Geschiktheid (art. 256 Rv)......................................................................................................................100
Ad 3) Ordemaatregel........................................................................................................................................100
Ad 1) Spoedeisend belang................................................................................................................................102
Van Gelder/NOC NSF (NJF 2016/394)...........................................................................................................103
Van Gelder/NOC NSF (2)................................................................................................................................103
Verschillen met bodemprocedure.....................................................................................................................104
Incasso kort geding...........................................................................................................................................105
Arbeidsvoorziening/TMU (NJ 2002/395).........................................................................................................106
Art. 257 Rv........................................................................................................................................................107
Betekenis art. 257 Rv........................................................................................................................................107
Betekenis art. 257 Rv (2)..................................................................................................................................108
Verhouding kort geding/bodemzaak.................................................................................................................108
Staat/NVV (NJ 2001/407).................................................................................................................................109
Hoorcollege 7 – Burgerlijk procesrecht.............................................................................................................110
Bewijs I.............................................................................................................................................................110
Belang bewijsrecht:..........................................................................................................................................110
Uitgangspunten die het speelveld van de bewijslevering inkleuren.................................................................117
Uitgangspunten (2)...........................................................................................................................................118
Uitgangspunten (3)...........................................................................................................................................118
Maar: wie moet stellen?...................................................................................................................................121
Bewijslastverdeling en verweer........................................................................................................................122
Bewijslevering..................................................................................................................................................124
‘Veegformule’...................................................................................................................................................125
TEGENBEWIJS................................................................................................................................................127
BEWIJSLASTVERDELING..............................................................................................................................128
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller esmee-franssen. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.92. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
