100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Orlando (1992): A Visualisation of the Performativity of Gender $9.02
Add to cart

Essay

Orlando (1992): A Visualisation of the Performativity of Gender

 36 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

The film Orlando creates a simplified version of Virginia Woolf’s story by focusing predominantly on how the main character, Orlando, is positioned in society in relation to other people as a man and how that changes once he transitions to woman. The film is a visual representation of how gender...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • February 4, 2021
  • 6
  • 2019/2020
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • 8-9
avatar-seller
Berge, van den 1


Maud van den Berge

Lara Mazurski

Gender & Sexuality

11/03/2020

Orlando (1992): A Visualisation of the Performativity of Gender



“Gender reality is performative which means, quite simply, that it is real only to the

extent that it is performed” – Judith Butler



“Same person. No difference at all. Just a different sex” is what Orlando (Tilda Swinton),

in the film adaptation (Orlando, 1992) of the Virginia Woolf text of the same name says when

‘transitioning’ from man to woman. The transition is visualized by showing Tilda Swinton’s

naked body through the mirror she is looking at while saying those words. It soon becomes clear,

however, that this statement is not as clear-cut and easy in the practice of real life, because

identifying as woman in society comes with certain ramifications that differ significantly from

that of the identification as man. The film Orlando creates a simplified version of Virginia

Woolf’s story by focusing predominantly on how the main character, Orlando, is positioned in

society in relation to other people as a man and how that changes once he1 transitions to woman.

The film is a visual representation of how gender is a ‘role’ one can take on and ‘perform’

accordingly while simultaneously being critical of the implications that come with ‘doing’ a

certain established gender. There is a theatrical aspect to the way the character Orlando is

presented, which essentializes and dramatizes the notion of gender performativity while at the

1
For the sake of clarity, I will refer to the main character as ‘he’ before the transition and as ‘she’ after the

transition.

, Berge, van den 2


same time creating a playing field for a conversation about how gender can be perceived as

performative. The contextualisation of this in the framework of transgender studies and gender

studies, with a specific focus on Judith Butler’s concept of gender performativity, will be the

groundwork for this analysis of the film Orlando.

Butler argues that “gender is a repeated stylization of the body”, which is a useful

approach to understand the positionality of Orlando as he goes through time and space

identifying as a man and later as a woman (33). The film blurs the boundaries between what is

conceived as ‘natural’ while at the same time staying within the repetition of heteronormativity

in terms of representation, until arguably the last few scenes where Orlando travels through time

and finds herself in the 20th century as an androgynous single mom not conforming to

expectations. The first part of the film plays out in the 17th century, Orlando is a well-liked poet

and well acknowledged man in Britain. He is admired by Queen Elizabeth and inherits parts of

land from her when she dies, which leaves him in a considerably powerful position.

Consequently, as comes with power, there is a ‘natural’ position of superiority tied to his

prosperity, which is portrayed throughout the first hour of the film as Orlando goes about life not

caring much about others except for this one woman that he can not have but claims to be his.

This description, however, is not accurate without mentioning that there is an ironic, feminist

undertone throughout this representation as Orlando keeps breaking the fourth wall and making

comments about masculinity that have a tendency to undermine it. This playfulness again

dismantles and destabilizes the idea of gender as a set of binary oppositions, while still staying

within the visible boundaries of heteronormative presentation.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller maudvandenberge. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.02. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

47561 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$9.02
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added