- Maximise the total welfare of an entire society (everybody’s welfare has equal weight) .
- It is just if it has maximized the total good for all is greater than this net amount for any
incompatible act available to the agent on occasion
- Utility is the only thing with intrinsic value
- Everybody’s welfare has equal weight. It is an operationalized approach.
- Critique: but if you maximize and aggregate everything they you are insufficiently sensible to
societal distribution effects people do not derive the same amount of utility
- Critique: consequentialist nature & blind to minorities
- Neoliberalism: Efficiency as public policy cost-benefit analysis: to assess policy derives
from utilitarianism
- Vallentyne:
- V: Act utilitarianism: an act is just if and only if it maximizes the total wellbeing in the world.
- V: Rule utilitarianism: an act is just if and only if it conforms to rules that, if generally
followed, would maximize the total wellbeing in the world
- V: It is too demanding, it provides too little protection from interference from others, it is
insensitive to what the past was like, it is insensitive to distributive considerations
- If you focus too much on utilitarian perspective, you will miss a lot of info you will need for
just planning.
- Too much focus on utilitarianism & contractarianism due to institutional embeddedness of
actor-temporal dynamics Planners need to balance diversity, growth and equality
Egalitarianism. Used in socio democratic
- Equal fundamental worth and moral status for every human being
- Inequalities due to morally arbitrary circumstances such as natural lotteries of conditions in
which one is born are to be compensate through the difference principle
- Difference principle: max-min criterion: inequalities are only fair if they benefit the least-
advantaged members of society: choose policy alternative that maximizes people in worst
position egalitarian distribution of goods. Rawls.
- Critique: what should be equal (opportunity, rights, income?) + requires ‘over a lifetime
assessment’ + is all inequality bad? You choose for it
- Vallentyne: Egalitarianism justice is concerned with equality of some relevant benefits
- Causal inequalities caused by space: fully in the domain of planners. egalitarianism needed to
remove all inequalities that occurred throughout the process.
- Hartmann & Jehling:
- Emphasis on community, moral commitment to the community, participative and
collaborative planning approaches
- Social spaces to allow communities to assemble and collaborate 🡪 to facilitate social control:
the common goods
- The common city: It relies on an egalitarian rationality as rules of a common use cannot be
enforced (due to low excludability), but only mutually agreed on by users through social
interaction
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller student1rug. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $0.00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.