100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
4.3 Severe Mental Illness in Urban Context Samenvatting Week 1 $5.93   Add to cart

Summary

4.3 Severe Mental Illness in Urban Context Samenvatting Week 1

 97 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Samenvatting van alle te lezen literatuur van week 1 en colleges van het vak 4.3 Severe Mental Illness in Urban Context van de master Klinische Psychologie aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR). Behaald tentamencijfer: 8.0. Literatuur is in het Nederlands samengevat en colleges zijn voornamel...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 20  pages

  • February 15, 2021
  • 20
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
1


WEEK 1: Diagnosis in context

Lecture 1 (video lecture): Course introduction

Learning activities
The course is structured by Learning Paths, that follow 5 themes. Each theme follows a track of:
 a pre-recorded video lecture (watch individually before (2))
 an interactive (guest) lecture (live plenary session, this year online via zoom)
 reading a specified set of literature (individually, before (4))
 tutorial groups (mandatory presence) where
o students are provided with a clinical case vignette
o students are assigned to 4- or 5-person peer groups
o students discuss a clinical case vignette using knowledge from (1)-(3)
o students together create a peer report (in-class or after class) that is submitted to canvas




Learning objectives
At the end of this course, the student knows how to:
 Describe diagnostic and etiological aspects of complex mental problems at a psychological, biological, and
societal level.
 Identify complex mental disorders related to psychosis.
 Explain the relation between severe mental illness with substance use, violence and other comorbid
psychological issues, especially within the urban context.
 Take a critical stance towards the use of the DSM and other diagnostic approaches in clinical practice and
scientific research.
 Make an informed choice for an intervention/treatment plan, with consideration of legal and ethical aspects
and restrictions.
 Reflect on his/her own role as a psychologist within a multidisciplinary team.

Tutorial groups
 Tutorial groups (mandatory presence) where
o students are provided with a clinical case vignette
o students are assigned to 4- or 5-person peer groups
o students discuss a clinical case vignette using knowledge from (1)-(3)

, 2


o students together create a peer report (in-class or after class) that is submitted to canvas
 Substitute Task: In case of absence, students have to arrange a new group meeting with other absent
students themselves. The group meeting has to be videotaped and the peer report has to be handed in
before the regular deadline in order to pass to course.
 Group assignments (pass/fail)

Peer assignments
 We use the tool Miro Mindmapping
 We have to arrange a mindmap and save this as a PDF. You can arrange your discussion e.g. positive and
negative aspects. Make sure to create a legenda if you do this!
 Names of the group members have to be visible!

Evaluation
 Three pass/fail assignments
 Exam:
o December 11th. 2020 from 13:30 – 16:00
o M-hall / online proctoring
o Open questions  see tutorial on questions
 How do you argument your statements?
 How do you reflect on what you say?
o 100% of grade

General
 Use the discussion forum for:
o Questions, queries, discussions
o In case of substitute task: find team members
 Recording of interactive lectures
o Zoom lectures will be recorded
o You are allowed to close your video
 Interaction during lectures
o Use the chat for real-time questions
o Use the discussion forum

Lecture 2 (interactive lecture): Diagnosis in context

Severe and Persistent Mental Illness (SPMI)
 The National Institute of Mental Health (1987) defined SPMI using the following criteria:
o A major diagnosis of non-organic psychosis or personality disorder
o Duration of at least 2 years
o At least three of the five categories of functional disabilities
 Diagnosis: a major affective, non-organic psychotic disorder (not due to brain damage for example) or a
disorder that may lead to a chronic disability such as borderline personality disorder
 Duration: treatment history meets one or both of the following criteria
o Has undergone psychiatric treatment more intensive than outpatient care more than once in a
lifetime (e.g. crisis response services, alternative home care, partial hospitalization or inpatient
hospitalization)
o Has experiences an episode of continuous, supportive residential care, other than hospitalization,
for a longer period enough to have significantly disrupted the normal living situation.
 Disability: severe recurrent disability resulting from mental illness. The disability results in functional
limitations in major life activities. Individuals must meet at least two of the following criteria on a continuing
or intermittent basis:
o Is unemployed, is employed in a sheltered setting or supportive work situation, or has markedly
limited skills and a poor work history
o Requires financial assistance from out-of-hospital maintenance and may be unable to procure such
assistance without help
o Has difficulty in establishing or maintaining a personal social support system
o Requires help in basic living skills such as hygiene, food preparation or money management
o Exhibits inappropriate social behavior which results in intervention by the mental and/or judicial
system

, 3


 Disclaimer disability: this is the image when
we think about people with severe mental
illness, whom we sometimes don’t really
understand, etc. So this does not apply to
everyone! It’s good to keep this in mind, but
this image is not a necessity.
 ‘Difficult to treat patients’ or even ‘difficult
patients’
o Has a very clear appeal to stigma, but
these term is unfortunately used in
care
o A problematic aspect with patients
with severe mental illness is that
often more problems are occurring
than only mental illness. Sometimes
this makes it difficult to know who is
in charge or responsible when a lot of
institutes are involved.
o (Urban) contextual factors:
 Poverty (dept)
 Low social-economic status
 Unemployment
 Homelessness
 Criminal / inappropriate social
behavior
o Dual diagnosis:
 In combination with substance abuse (most often the case with this population. An
overlooked option is that substances are used as self-medication. This is important to take
into account, because these substances can be used as a coping method)
 Childhood trauma, childhood abuse, and attachment problems
 Depressive and anxiety symptoms. These may need to be treated, but have a complex
interaction with the most major diagnosis. This makes treatment more difficult
 Perspective on SPMI: ‘For much of the 20th century, severe mental illness was considered chronic and
deteriorating, requiring institutional tertiary care or high-intensity secondary care. This approach changes in
the 1960s with the advent of antipsychotic drugs and subsequent deinstitutionalization, which gave new
hope to patients with severe mental illness who were discharged into the community’ (Whitley, Palmer, &
Gunn, 2015). So in the last few decades the climate of psychiatric care has changed drastically.

From care to cure
 Cure is a word we know from the medical (physical) healthcare. It’s an ideal that is very much rooted as well
in psychiatric care. The term severe mental illness implies the medical discourse of cure and a drug-
based treatment. This cure paradigm, regardless of the symptom severity, that implies that people can be
cured.
 Nomothetic approach: explanation of symptoms by underlying disease. Nomothetic is an universal
approach which hold to certain laws or regulations that apply for everyone, so it’s the opposite of an
personalized approach.
o In psychiatry as well as in the medical world the focus is often on universal / lawful disease states.
o When person X has disease Y, the disease will cause symptoms x, y and z. This is a general
assumption in the general model.
o In psychiatry we like to infer such underlying disease states, but it’s very difficult to know the
underlying disease states. What’s known are the symptoms.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller DePsychologieStudent. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.93. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67096 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.93  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart