100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary Sociology, Philosophy and Ethics of Research CA$10.08   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (RU)
  4.  
  5. Sociology, Philosophy & Ethics of Research (MANMPOL038)

Summary

Summary Sociology, Philosophy and Ethics of Research
 18 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Sociology, Philosophy & Ethics of Research (MANMPOL038)
  • Institution
  • Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (RU)
  • Book
  • Objectivity and Diversity

This summary includes notes from the lectures and summaries of the literatures under 'seminars', completely with additional question for studying or to start a disscusion in the seminar group.

Preview 3 out of 26  pages

Document information

  • No
  • Hoofdstuk 1, 2, 4, 6 & 7
  • October 29, 2021
  • 26
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary

Subjects

  • ethics
  • philosophy
  • kuhn
  • arendt
  • popper
  • harding
  • sociology
  • open science
  • said
  • anti positivism
  • positivism
  • post colonialism
  • gender theory
  • marxism
  • critical theory
  • discourse

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

Written for

  • Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (RU)
  • Political Science
  • Sociology, Philosophy & Ethics of Research (MANMPOL038)
All documents for this subject (2)

Seller

avatar-seller
lonnehagen

Content preview

Sociology, Philosophy & Ethics of Research

Week 1

Lecture - History of Philosophy of Science

Philosophy of Science: epistemology vs. metaphysics
- The Greeks
1. Plato: a world divided into two world
→ the world of ideas, and sensory perceptions
→ real knowledge can only be obtained by thinking: abstract forms
→ not by sensory perceptions
→ observation is secondary
2. Aristotle
→ the essence of things
→ observation is crucial: empirical enquirement
→ careful, but passive observation (don’t interfere)
→ inductive method
→ main aim of science are the rules of nature to guide our world around us
- Islamic Contribution
1. Ibn-Sina
2. Ibn al-Haytham
→ Aristotelian view by doing experiments
3. Al-Biruni
→ repetitive experiments
- Scientific Revolution
1. Copernicus
→ rejection of everything that has been taking for granted in the Greek period
→ paradigm shift
2. Vesalius
→ empiricism in anatomy
3. Newton
→ single set of laws that can describe things of others
- 17th century: Rationalists vs. Empiricists
1. Francis Bacon: empiricist
2. René Descartes
→ mechanical view of physics and philosophy
→ laws behind moving parts → not observable
3. Huygens: empiricist
- 18th century: Skepticism
1. Hume
→ how can we know something we cannot observe
→ are past experiences translatable to the future?
→ problem of causality: cause and effect do not exist independently of
us
→ problem of induction: there is no logically inherent reason to believe
something in the past will also happen in the future (only made up in
our minds) → all knowledge is fundamentally unsure

,Implications
1. demarcation between science and non-science (or pseudo-science)
2. the nature of science
3. the consequences for the authority of science
→ e.g. covid-debate or climate-debate

Seminar - Open Sciences

Open the Social Sciences (Wallerstein)
Chapter 1
- Since 16th century, truth/knowledge
→ Newton
→ Descartes/dualism
- Victory of natural sciences at the beginning of the 19th century.
→ Universities, natural sciences, tensions between ‘sciences’
→ Birth of social sciences, positivism, Comte
→ Positivism, political science this process takes place at same time as colonialism
→ disciplines, areas of knowledge, epistemologies, categories, methods
Chapter 2
- three major changes (in world political structure)
1. US superpower
2. Baby boom
3. University goes global
→ Consequences of these changes
1. Validity of the distinctions among the SS
2. Degree to which the heritage is parochial
3. Utility and reality of the distinction between the ‘two’ cultures.
Chapter 3
- disciplines have controlled the career patterns of the scholars
→ doctorates have been in a specific discipline
- disciplinary structures have covered their members with protective screen and have
been wary of crossing disciplinary lines
- eternal battle for resources allocation
- not reconfiguration of the organizational boundaries, but reconfiguration of larger
structures (faculties)
- there has been a growth of institutes of advanced studies
- electronic development question the current structure of universities
- methodological issues around the new construct
1. rewriting history in the name of the existing power structure (a.k.a.
disenchantment of the world)
→ no scientist can ever be extracted from his/her physical and social context
2. time and space seen as merely unchangeable realities, however are internal
variables shaped by our own social context
3. the artificial separations between the political, economic and social / cultural.
- looking beyond the state as analytical building block, however don’t lose yourself in
deterministic universalism
→ neglection of the international arena and the complexity on the local level
- the debate for social science to be more intercultural

, → acception of alternative set of values → plurality of the world view
Chapter 4
- science was historically constructed as a form of knowledge and then divided into
standard disciplines
- world developments after WWII raised questions about intellectual division (of labour)
and therefore reopened the issue of organizational restructuring
- disciplines serve a function: disciplining minds and channeling scholarly energy
- antinomies in the social sciences:
1. past vs. present
2. idiographic vs. nomographic
- situatedness of scholars
- recommendations
1. the expansion of institutions, within or allied to the universities, which would
bring together scholars around a specific urgent theme
2. the establishment of integrated research programs within universities
structures that cut across traditional lines, have specific intellectual objectives
and a funds for a limited period of time
3. the compulsory joint appointment for professors
4. joint work for graduate student

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lonnehagen. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$10.08. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75619 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$10.08  3x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart